Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2015; 21(21): 6706-6712
Published online Jun 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6706
Published online Jun 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6706
Patient | Age (yr) | Sex | Location | Macroscopic type | Tumor size (mm) | Tumorcolor | Tumordepth | Tumordifferentiation | Treatment | Adverse effect | FL | |
Method | Time (min) | |||||||||||
1 | 71 | F | M | Protruded | 20 | Reddish | m | tub1 | ESD | 50 | No | Yes |
2 | 65 | M | L | Protruded | 20 | Reddish | m | tub1 | ESD | 23 | Yes | Yes |
2 | 65 | M | U | Protruded | 15 | Reddish | sm | tub2 | ESD | 82 | Yes | No |
3 | 75 | M | L | Protruded | 14 | Reddish | m | tub1 | ESD | 34 | Yes | Yes |
4 | 56 | M | M | Protruded | 10 | Reddish | m | tub1 | ESD | 54 | No | Yes |
5 | 70 | M | M | Protruded | 8 | Discolored | m | tub1 | EMR | 7 | No | Yes |
6 | 66 | M | U | Protruded | 10 | Reddish | adenoma | ESD | 60 | Yes | Yes | |
7 | 59 | M | L | Depressed | 12 | Reddish | m | tub1 | ESD | 43 | No | No |
8 | 65 | M | M | Depressed | 15 | Reddish | sm | tub1 | ESD | 23 | No | No |
8 | 65 | M | M | Depressed | 5 | Discolored | m | sig | ESD | 37 | No | No |
9 | 69 | F | R | Protruded | 20 | Reddish | m | tub1 | EMR | 25 | Yes | No |
10 | 67 | F | S | Protruded | 18 | Discolored | m | tub1 | EMR | 10 | No | No |
10 | 67 | F | S | Protruded | 23 | Reddish | sm | pap | EMR | 26 | No | Yes |
Total | 66.3 ± 5.91 | 7M3F | 2U/5M/ | 10 Protruded | 14.6 ± 5.41 | 10 Reddish | 9 m/ | 1 adenoma | 9 ESD | 36.5 ± 21.11 | 4 Yes | 7 Yes |
3L/2S/1R | 3 Depressed | 3 Discolored | 3 sm | 9 tub1/1 tub2 1 pap/1 sig | 4 EMR | 6 No | 6 No |
Fluorescence | ||||
No(n = 6) | Yes(n = 7) | Total(n = 13) | P value | |
Sex | ||||
F | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
M | 4 | 5 | 9 | 1.00 |
Age (yr) | ||||
mean ± SD | 65.0 ± 2.0 | 67.1 ± 1.9 | 66.2 ± 4.9 | 0.45 |
Tumor color | ||||
Reddish | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.56 |
Discolored | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tumor size (mm) | ||||
mean ± SD | 14.2 ± 2.3 | 15.0 ± 2.1 | 14.6 ± 5.4 | 0.80 |
Macroscopic type | ||||
Protruded | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.07 |
Depressed | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Tumor differentiation | ||||
Differentiated | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.46 |
Undifferentiated | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Tumor depth | ||||
m | 4 | 5 | 9 | 1.00 |
sm | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Lymphatic invasion | ||||
Absent | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Present | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.00 |
Venous invasion | ||||
Absent | 5 | 6 | 11 | 1.00 |
Present | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Procedure time (min) | ||||
mean ± SD | 36.7 ± 9.0 | 36.3 ± 8.3 | 36.5 ± 21.1 | 0.98 |
- Citation: Nakamura M, Nishikawa J, Hamabe K, Goto A, Nishimura J, Shibata H, Nagao M, Sasaki S, Hashimoto S, Okamoto T, Sakaida I. Preliminary study of photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid in gastric and colorectal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(21): 6706-6712
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i21/6706.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6706