Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6236-6245
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6236
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6236
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study patients n (%)
Recipient characteristics | n | |
Median age (yr) | 182 | 52 ± 8.2 |
Male gender | 182 | 145 (80) |
Ethnicity | 182 | |
Caucasian | 91 (50) | |
Black | 18 (10) | |
Hispanic | 52 (29) | |
Asian | 14 (8) | |
Arabic | 6 (3) | |
Others | 1 (1) | |
IL28B | 122 | |
CC | 40 (33) | |
CT | 51 (42) | |
TT | 31 (25) | |
HCC (pre-LT) | 182 | 75 (41) |
Diabetes mellitus | 182 | 71 (39) |
CMV positivity | 181 | 126 (70) |
Duration from LT to anti-viral therapy (mo) | 182 | 20.5 ± 43.5 |
Median peak PEG dose (mcg/wk) | 181 | 180 ± 31.6 |
Median peak RBV daily dose (mg) | 181 | 800 ± 294 |
Median treatment duration (wk) | 182 | 48 ± 21.5 |
HCV genotype | 182 | |
1 | 141 (77) | |
1a | 80/141 (57) | |
1b | 51/141 (36) | |
Subtype not available | 10/141 (7) | |
2 | 15 (8) | |
3 | 14 (8) | |
4 | 12 (7) | |
Median baseline lab values | ||
ALT (IU) | 181 | 84 ± 128.3 |
AST (IU) | 181 | 80 ± 112.5 |
ALP (IU) | 180 | 131 ± 144.3 |
Total bilirubin (mg) | 181 | 0.9 ± 3.1 |
HCV RNA (IU/mL) | 181 | 3870000 ± 23602918 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 180 | 13 ± 1.7 |
White cell count | 180 | 4.3 ± 1.9 |
Platelets | 181 | 123 ± 73 |
Creatinine | 181 | 1.2 ± 1.3 |
Immunosuppression at start of LADR1 | 182 | |
Tacrolimus | 146 (80)1 | |
Cyclosporine | 25 (14) | |
Sirolimus | 4 (2) | |
Mycophenolate mofetil | 66 (36) | |
Prednisone | 9 (5) | |
Donor characteristics | ||
Male gender | 175 | 99 (57) |
Median age | 177 | 48 ± 18 |
CMV positivity | 178 | 117 (66) |
Ethnicity | 182 | |
White | 118 (65) | |
Black | 26 (14) | |
Hispanic | 12 (7) | |
Asian | 6 (3) | |
American indian/alaskan native | 3 (2) | |
Other/unknown | 17 (9) | |
Donor IL28B | 122 | |
CC | 66 (54) | |
CT | 35 (29) | |
TT | 21 (17) |
Table 2 Viral kinetics and SVR
Percentage | Percentage who went on to achieve SVR | P value | |
RVR | 0.0003 | ||
Yes | 14 | 31 | |
No | 86 | 69 | |
Week 8 negativity | < 0.0001 | ||
Yes | 29 | 72 | |
No | 71 | 20 | |
EVR | < 0.0001 | ||
Yes | 41 | 72 | |
No | 59 | 11 |
Table 3 Univariate analysis
Factors associated with SVR | SVR (%) | P value |
HCV genotype 1 vs non-1 | 29 vs 71 | < 0.0001 |
HCV viral load < 1 million vs≥ 1 million IU/mL | 54 vs 33 | 0.009 |
Recipient IL28B-CC vs non-CC | 55 vs 34 | 0.03 |
Paired IL28b recipient CC and donor non-CC vs other recipient and donor combinations | 72 vs 36 | 0.007 |
Pre-treatment total bilirubin < 1.5 mg vs≥ 1.5 mg | 44 vs 25 | 0.02 |
Pre-treatment ALP < 150 vs≥ 150 | 44 vs 29 | 0.04 |
Treatment duration ≥ 48 wk vs < 48 wk | 45 vs 27 | 0.02 |
Peak RBV dose ≥ 800 mg vs < 800 mg | 44 vs 25 | 0.02 |
Administration of MMF vs No MMF | 30 vs 43 | 0.09 |
RVR vs no RVR | 34 vs 66 | 0.0006 |
EVR vs no EVR | 85 vs 15 | < 0.0001 |
Week 8 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable | 72 vs 20 | < 0.0001 |
Donor age ≤ 40 vs > 40 | 58 vs 29 | 0.0002 |
Matched recipient and donor ethnicity vs unmatched | 46 vs 33 | 0.09 |
Mismatched CMV status (D+/R-) vs other combinations | 54 vs 35 | 0.04 |
Pre-treatment fibrosis stage 0-2 vs 3-4 | 43 vs 26 | 0.08 |
Factors associated with patient survival | 10-year survival (%) | |
Week 8 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable | 71 vs 44 | 0.003 |
Week 12 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable | 73 vs 44 | < 0.001 |
Pre-treatment fibrosis stage 0-2 vs 3-4 | 70 vs 31 | 0.004 |
Pre-treatment ALP < 150 vs≥ 150 | 67 vs 42 | < 0.001 |
Pre-treatment total bilirubin < 1.5 mg vs≥ 1.5 mg | 62 vs 46 | < 0.001 |
Pre-treatment creatinine < 2 vs≥ 2 | 61 vs 0 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis
Factors associated with SVR | Comparison | Adjusted OR for SVR | 95%CI | P value | |
Lower | Upper | ||||
HCV genotype | 2 vs 1 | 11.40 | 2.8 | 47.3 | < 0.0001 |
3 vs 1 | 43.10 | 6.5 | 286.3 | ||
4 vs 1 | 10.70 | 2.4 | 48.8 | ||
Pre-treatment total bilirubin | ≥ 1.5 vs < 1.5 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.002 |
Donor age | Each 10 yr | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.003 |
CMV mismatch | Donor +/recipient - | 4.80 | 1.8 | 12.6 | 0.001 |
vs all others | |||||
HCV viral load (baseline) | Each 1 million | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.999 | 0.040 |
Adjusted HR | |||||
Pre-treatment ALP | ≥ 150 vs < 150 | 2.01 | 1.18 | 3.43 | 0.010 |
Pre-treatment total bilirubin | ≥ 1.5 vs < 1.5 | 2.49 | 1.47 | 4.21 | 0.001 |
Pre-treatment creatinine | ≥ 2 vs < 2 | 5.88 | 2.68 | 12.92 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Histological characteristics (76 patients) n (%)
Pre-anti viral treatment | Post-anti viral treatment | P value | |
Fibrosis stage (n = 76)(based on the Scheuer scheme) | |||
Stage 0-2 | 65 (86) | 41 (54) | < 0.001 |
Stage 3-4 | 11 (14) | 35 (46) | |
Grade (n = 76) | |||
Grade 0-2 | 51 (67) | 46 (61) | 0.33 |
Grade 3-4 | 25 (33) | 30 (39) | |
Degree of steatosis (brunt classification) (n = 78) | |||
Score 0-1 | 69 (88) | 73 (94) | 0.29 |
Score 2-3 | 9 (12) | 5 (6) | |
Steatohepatitis grade (n = 75) | |||
Grade 0 | 69 (92) | 71 (95) | 0.73 |
Grade 1-2 | 6 (8) | 4 (5) | |
Steatohepatitis stage (n = 75) | |||
Stage 0-1 | 72 (96) | 73 (97) | 1.00 |
Stage 2-4 | 3 (4) | 2 (3) |
Table 6 Change in fibrosis stage after anti-viral treatment (76 cases) n (%)
Fibrosis | SVR (n =32) P = 0.08 | Survived (n =60) P = 0.03 | |
Progressed | |||
one stage | 32 (42) | 17 (53) | 27 (45) |
two stages | 10 (13) | 5 (16) | 9 (15) |
≥ three stages | 5 (7) | 1 (3) | 2 (4) |
Unchanged | 23 (30) | 5 (16) | 17 (28) |
Improved | 6 (8) | 4 (12) | 5 (8) |
Table 7 Frequency of rejection, plasma cell hepatitis and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis n (%)
Pre-anti viral treatmentn = 153 | On-anti viral treatmentn =90 | Post-anti viral treatmentn = 89 | |
Rejection | 39 (25) | 12 (13)1 | 8 (9) |
ACR | 39 (25) | 10 (11) | 7 (8) |
CDR | 0 | 5 (6) | 1 (1) |
Plasma cell hepatitis | 7 (5) | 11 (12) | 12 (13) |
Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis | 7 (5) | 5 (6) | 1 (1) |
- Citation: Lim KB, Sima HR, Fiel MI, Khaitova V, Doucette JT, Chernyiak M, Ahmad J, Bach N, Chang C, Grewal P, Kim-Schluger L, Liu L, Odin J, Perumalswami P, Florman SS, Schiano TD. Utility of the low-accelerating-dose regimen in 182 liver recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6236-6245
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6236.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6236