Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 584-592
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the recipients and their donors n (%)
Group A | Group B | Group C | P value | |||
A <-> B | A <-> C | B <-> C | ||||
Number of patients | 4684 | 491 | 158 | - | - | - |
Age, mean ± SD (range) (yr) | 48.2 ± 9.3 (19-76) | 48.3 ± 9.5 (19-73) | 48.4 ± 8 (26-71) | 0.892 | 0.998 | 0.956 |
Male sex | 4136 (88.3) | 436 (88.8) | 142 (89.9) | 0.744 | 0.544 | 0.707 |
MELD score at LT, mean ± SD (range) | 18.0 ± 9.5 (6-84) | 17.6 ± 10.1 (6-65) | 16.8 ± 9.2 (6-50) | 0.205 | 0.250 | 0.847 |
Child-Pugh score at LT, mean ± SD (range) | 8.9 ± 2.5 (5-15) | 8.7 ± 2.8 (5-15) | 8.7 ± 2.7 (5-14) | 0.391 | 0.771 | 0.999 |
With HCC | 2146 (45.8) | 251 (51.1) | 76 (48.1) | 0.025 | 0.571 | 0.509 |
Pre-LT HBeAg positivity | 1169 (25.0) | 171 (34.8) | 58 (36.7) | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.667 |
Pre-LT HBV DNA positivity | 2248 (48.0) | 168 (34.2) | 62 (39.2) | < 0.001 | 0.030 | 0.251 |
HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mL at LT | 1024 (21.9) | 40 (8.1) | 17 (10.8) | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.313 |
Pre-LT antiviral therapy | 2604 (55.6) | 272 (55.4) | 104 (65.8) | 0.934 | 0.011 | 0.021 |
Duration of antiviral therapy before LT, mean ± SD (range) (d) | 233.4 ± 604.4 (1-7633) | 92.8 ± 299.3 (1-3280) | 347.1 ± 899.0 (2-7766) | 0.804 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Number of donors | 4684 | 491 | 158 | - | - | - |
Age, mean ± SD (range) (yr) | 28.8 ± 6.2 (18-62) | 29.1 ± 6.9 (19-61) | 29.3 ± 6.3 (20-51) | 0.997 | 0.700 | 0.737 |
Male sex | 4495 (96.0) | 467 (95.1) | 147 (93.0) | 0.365 | 0.069 | 0.315 |
Deceased donor | 4373 (93.4) | 424 (86.4) | 129 (81.7) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.147 |
Living donor | 311 (6.6) | 67 (13.7) | 29 (18.3) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.147 |
BMI, mean ± SD (range) | 22.4 ± 2.7 (15.5-52.1) | 23.2 ± 2.7 (17.6-30.5) | 22.6 ± 2.9 (15.8-28.4) | 0.069 | 0.895 | 0.646 |
HBsAb positivity | 606 (12.9) | 68 (13.8) | 27 (17.1) | 0.568 | 0.128 | 0.316 |
HBcAb positivity | 160 (3.4) | 21 (4.3) | 2 (1.3) | 0.323 | 0.139 | 0.075 |
Table 2 Posttransplant survival of the recipients
Group A | Group B | Group C | P value | |||
A <-> B | A <-> C | B <-> C | ||||
Recipients (n) | 4684 | 491 | 158 | -- | -- | -- |
Death during the follow-up (n) | 939 | 57 | 18 | -- | -- | -- |
Cumulative survival rate | ||||||
1-yr | 86.2% | 94.4% | 92.5% | |||
3-yr | 76.9% | 86.6% | 87.0% | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.137 |
5-yr | 73.7% | 82.4% | 81.6% | |||
Duration of follow-up, mean ± SD (range) (mo) | 45.8 ± 33.7 (0-141.8) | 30.2 ± 17.2 (0.1-77.1) | 35.1 ± 20.5 (0.2-84.2) | -- | -- | -- |
Table 3 Posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence of the recipients
Group A | Group B | Group C | P value | |||
A <-> B | A <-> C | B <-> C | ||||
Recipients (n) | 4684 | 491 | 158 | - | - | - |
HBV recurrence during the follow-up (n) | 179 | 5 | 3 | - | - | - |
Death in patients with HBV recurrence (n) | 47 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
Cumulative HBV recurrence rate | ||||||
1-yr | 1.7% | 0.5% | 0.7% | |||
3-yr | 3.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.023 | 0.060 | 0.234 |
5-yr | 4.7% | 1.5% | 4.4% |
Table 4 Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence
Factor | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value | |
Age (yr) | 18-29 vs≥ 65 | 2.281 | 0.589-8.831 | 0.232 |
30-39 vs≥ 65 | 1.441 | 0.438-4.736 | 0.547 | |
40-49 vs≥ 65 | 1.910 | 0.603-6.057 | 0.272 | |
50-64 vs≥ 65 | 1.657 | 0.522-5.262 | 0.392 | |
Gender | Male vs Female | 1.092 | 0.687-1.737 | 0.710 |
Pre-LT MELD score | 6-9 vs 30-40 | 1.347 | 0.789-2.300 | 0.276 |
10-19 vs 30-40 | 1.226 | 0.767-1.958 | 0.395 | |
20-29 vs 30-40 | 1.034 | 0.613-1.744 | 0.899 | |
Pre-LT Child-Pugh score | 5-6 vs 10-15 | 0.921 | 0.584-1.452 | 0.723 |
7-9 vs 10-15 | 1.029 | 0.710-1.492 | 0.879 | |
Pre-LT with HCC | Yes vs No | 1.438 | 1.078-1.919 | 0.014 |
Pre-LT HBeAg status | Positive vs Negative | 1.176 | 0.956-1.772 | 0.325 |
Pre-LT serum HBV DNA level | ||||
HBV DNA | Positive vs Negative | 1.185 | 0.805-1.743 | 0.389 |
HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mL | Yes vs No | 1.395 | 1.012-1.921 | 0.042 |
Pre-LT antiviral therapy | ||||
Using LAM | Yes vs No | 0.930 | 0.697-1.241 | 0.622 |
Using ETV | Yes vs No | 0.133 | 0.019-0.949 | 0.044 |
Using ADV | Yes vs No | 0.328 | 0.046-2.333 | 0.265 |
Post-LT HBV prophylactic protocol | HBIG + LAM vs HBIG + ETV | 2.949 | 1.210-7.188 | 0.017 |
HBIG + ADV vs HBIG + ETV | 1.714 | 0.410-7.171 | 0.461 | |
Donor profiles | ||||
Donor source | Living donor vs Deceased donor | 0.900 | 0.500-1.621 | 0.726 |
Donor gender | Male vs Female | 0.564 | 0.298-1.067 | 0.078 |
Donor HBsAb positivity | Positive vs Negative | 0.481 | 0.267-0.864 | 0.014 |
Donor HBcAb positivity | Positive vs Negative | 1.598 | 0.786-3.247 | 0.195 |
Table 5 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence
Factor | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value | |
Pre-LT with HCC | Yes vs No | 1.718 | 1.243-2.375 | 0.001 |
Pre-LT serum HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mL | Yes vs No | 1.370 | 0.989-1.897 | 0.048 |
Pre-LT using ETV | Yes vs No | 0.166 | 0.019-1.484 | 0.108 |
Post-LT HBV prophylactic protocol | HBIG + LAM vs HBIG + ETV | 2.127 | 0.416-3.055 | 0.046 |
Donor profiles | ||||
Donor gender | Male vs Female | 0.632 | 0.156-1.144 | 0.201 |
Donor HBsAb positivity | Positive vs Negative | 0.526 | 0.265-1.045 | 0.066 |
- Citation: Shen S, Jiang L, Xiao GQ, Yan LN, Yang JY, Wen TF, Li B, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Wei YG. Prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: A registry study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 584-592
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/584.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584