Takahashi E, Fukasawa M, Sato T, Takano S, Kadokura M, Shindo H, Yokota Y, Enomoto N. Biliary drainage strategy of unresectable malignant hilar strictures by computed tomography volumetry. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4946-4953 [PMID: 25945008 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4946]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Mitsuharu Fukasawa, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan. fmitsu@yamanashi.ac.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4946-4953 Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4946
Table 1 Clinical features of 78 patients with malignant hilar strictures n (%)
Characteristic
Age (yr), mean ± SD
74.8 ± 10.3
Gender, male/female
53/25
Etiology
Cholangiocarcinoma
50 (64)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
10 (13)
Gallbladder carcinoma
9 (12)
Liver metastasis
5 (6)
Lymph node metastasis
4 (5)
Bismuth type (II/IIIa/IIIb/IV)
11/24/7/36
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), median (range)
9.0 (3.0-31.0)
Cholangitis
13 (17)
Liver function
Preserved liver function (without decompensated liver cirrhosis)
64 (82)
Impaired liver function (with decompensated liver cirrhosis)
14 (18)
Drainage method (MS/PS/ENBD/PTBD)
11/38/21/8
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral
72/6
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD
44.6 ± 18.6
Table 2 Predictors of initial drainage effectiveness by univariate analysis n (%)
Effective (n = 49)
Ineffective (n = 29)
P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD
74.0 ± 11.6
76.0 ± 7.5
0.39
Gender, male/female
32/17
21/8
0.78
Etiology, cholangiocarcinoma
32 (65.3)
18 (62.1)
0.81
Bismuth type IV
17 (34.6)
19 (65.5)
0.02
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), mean ± SD
9.9 ± 6.3
10.0 ± 4.7
0.93
Cholangitis
8 (16.3)
5 (17.2)
0.91
Impaired liver function
5 (10.2)
9 (31.0)
0.03
Drainage method, endoscopic drainage
43 (87.8)
27 (93.1)
0.71
Type of stent, metal stent
7 (14.3)
4 (13.8)
1.00
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral
43/6
29/0
0.16
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD
51.1 ± 18.6
33.5 ± 12.5
< 0.01
Table 3 Predictors of initial drainage effectiveness by multivariate analysis
Factors
OR
95%CI
P value
Bismuth type IV
0.92
0.245-3.418
0.896
Impaired liver function
0.06
0.009-0.426
0.005
Drained liver volume
2.92
1.648-5.197
< 0.001
Table 4 Predictors of drainage-associated cholangitis by univariate analysis n (%)
Cholangitis
Non-cholangitis
P value
n = 9
n = 69
Age (yr), mean ± SD
76.9 ± 8.3
74.5 ± 10.5
0.51
Gender, male/female
5/4
48/21
0.46
Etiology, cholangiocarcinoma
6 (66.7)
44 (63.8)
1.00
Bismuth type IV)
6 (66.7)
30 (43.5)
0.29
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
8.3 ± 3.5
10.6 ± 6.1
0.12
Impaired liver function
2 (22.2)
7 (10.1)
0.66
Drainage method, endoscopic drainage
7 (77.8)
63 (91.3)
0.23
Type of stent, metal stent
1 (11.1)
10 (14.5)
1.00
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral
9/0
63/6
1.00
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD
29.3 ± 4.4
46.6 ± 18.9
< 0.01
Citation: Takahashi E, Fukasawa M, Sato T, Takano S, Kadokura M, Shindo H, Yokota Y, Enomoto N. Biliary drainage strategy of unresectable malignant hilar strictures by computed tomography volumetry. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4946-4953