Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4946-4953
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4946
Table 1 Clinical features of 78 patients with malignant hilar strictures n (%)
Characteristic
Age (yr), mean ± SD74.8 ± 10.3
Gender, male/female53/25
Etiology
Cholangiocarcinoma50 (64)
Hepatocellular carcinoma10 (13)
Gallbladder carcinoma9 (12)
Liver metastasis5 (6)
Lymph node metastasis4 (5)
Bismuth type (II/IIIa/IIIb/IV)11/24/7/36
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), median (range)9.0 (3.0-31.0)
Cholangitis13 (17)
Liver function
Preserved liver function (without decompensated liver cirrhosis)64 (82)
Impaired liver function (with decompensated liver cirrhosis)14 (18)
Drainage method (MS/PS/ENBD/PTBD)11/38/21/8
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral72/6
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD44.6 ± 18.6
Table 2 Predictors of initial drainage effectiveness by univariate analysis n (%)
Effective (n = 49)Ineffective (n = 29)P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD74.0 ± 11.676.0 ± 7.50.39
Gender, male/female32/1721/80.78
Etiology, cholangiocarcinoma32 (65.3)18 (62.1)0.81
Bismuth type IV17 (34.6)19 (65.5)0.02
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), mean ± SD9.9 ± 6.310.0 ± 4.70.93
Cholangitis8 (16.3)5 (17.2)0.91
Impaired liver function5 (10.2)9 (31.0)0.03
Drainage method, endoscopic drainage43 (87.8)27 (93.1)0.71
Type of stent, metal stent7 (14.3)4 (13.8)1.00
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral43/629/00.16
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD51.1 ± 18.633.5 ± 12.5< 0.01
Table 3 Predictors of initial drainage effectiveness by multivariate analysis
FactorsOR95%CIP value
Bismuth type IV0.920.245-3.4180.896
Impaired liver function0.060.009-0.4260.005
Drained liver volume2.921.648-5.197< 0.001
Table 4 Predictors of drainage-associated cholangitis by univariate analysis n (%)
CholangitisNon-cholangitisP value
n = 9n = 69
Age (yr), mean ± SD76.9 ± 8.374.5 ± 10.50.51
Gender, male/female5/448/210.46
Etiology, cholangiocarcinoma6 (66.7)44 (63.8)1.00
Bismuth type IV)6 (66.7)30 (43.5)0.29
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)8.3 ± 3.510.6 ± 6.10.12
Impaired liver function2 (22.2)7 (10.1)0.66
Drainage method, endoscopic drainage7 (77.8)63 (91.3)0.23
Type of stent, metal stent1 (11.1)10 (14.5)1.00
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral9/063/61.00
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD29.3 ± 4.446.6 ± 18.9< 0.01