Zhang DZ, Wei XD, Wang XP. Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(15): 4635-4643 [PMID: 25914473 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4635]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Xiao-Peng Wang, Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong Gang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China. wangxiaopeng12000@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2015; 21(15): 4635-4643 Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4635
Table 1 Baseline and tumor characteristics of the study patients
Liver resection group
TACE group
P value
218
281
Age (yr)
52.1 ± 12.5
52.0 ± 13.5
0.950
Sex (M/F)
162/56
210/71
0.915
Weight (kg)
67.6 ± 9.5
66.8 ± 9.4
0.358
Height (cm)
165.5 ± 8.7
164.9 ± 9.0
0.496
BMI (kg/m2)
23.6 ± 2.5
23.6 ± 2.4
0.870
Cirrhosis etiology (HBV/HCV/negative/other)
193/5/9/11
256/6/6/13
0.352
MELD score
5.4 ± 1.8
5.5 ± 1.7
0.607
Child score (A/B/C)
162/56/0
222/59/0
0.218
EOCG score (0/1/2)
161/29/28
211/39/31
0.697
PHT (yes/no)
182/36
244/37
0.668
Tumor diameter of the largest target (cm)
6.2 ± 2.3
7.6 ± 2.2
< 0.001
AFP level (ng/mL)
2388.5 ± 7916.0
2650.1 ± 8514.4
0.726
0-400 ng/mL
120
136
400-800 ng/mL
11
26
800-1200 ng/mL
15
13
≥ 1210 ng/mL
72
106
NLR ≥ 4 (yes/no)
109/109
160/121
0.123
Obvious arterial phase enhancement (yes/no)
175/43
222/59
0.727
Diagnostic method (enhanced CT/MRI/biopsy)
172/36/10
238/27/16
0.127
Table 2 Post-operative complications in the two patient groups n (%)
Resection group
TACE group
P value
218
281
Complications (Clavien-Dindo classification)
68 (31.2)
154 (54.8)
< 0.001
Grade I (without drugs, conservative treatment)
18 (8.3)
77 (27.4)
Grade II (simple medicine treatment)
12 (5.5)
56 (19.9)
Grade IIIa (therapeutic operation under local anesthesia)
7 (3.2)
5 (1.8)
Grade IIIb (operational treatment under general anesthesia)
5 (2.3)
2 (0.7)
Grade IVa (single organ function failure)
5 (2.3)
1 (0.4)
Grade IVb (multiple organ failure)
4 (1.8)
1 (0.4)
Grade V (In-hospital death)
4 (1.8)
2 (0.7)
0.254
Minor complications (I-II)
30 (13.8)
133 (43.3)
< 0.001
Major complications (III-V)
38 (17.4)
11 (3.9)
< 0.001
30-d mortality
5 (2.3)
3 (1.1)
0.280
90-d mortality
8 (3.7)
7 (2.5)
0.445
Table 3 Univariate analyses show factors of overall survival
Variables
n
Overall survival rate
499
P value
Age < 60 (yes/no)
341/158
0.041
Gender (M/F)
372/127
0.596
BMI ≥ 26 (yes/no)
72/427
0.268
Cause of liver diseases (HBV/HCV/no/others)
449/11/15/24
0.779
Child-Pugh Score (A/B)
384/115
0.897
ECOG score (0/1/2)
372/68/59
0.594
PHT (yes/no)
425/74
< 0.001
ALB ≥ 35 g/L (yes/no)
275/224
0.221
Platelets ≥ 100 × 109/L (yes/no)
177/322
0.923
HB ≥ 120 g/L (yes/no)
331/168
0.602
Creatinine ≥ 100 μmol/L (yes/no)
49/450
0.675
NLR ≥ 4 (yes/no)
269/230
< 0.001
AFP level (1-400/400-800/800-1200/ > 1200 ng/mL)
256/37/28/178
0.218
Tumor diameter > 6 cm (yes/no)
306/193
< 0.001
Obvious arterial phase enhancement (yes/no)
397/102
0.361
Diagnostic method (enhanced CT/MRI/biopsy)
410/63/26
0.587
Therapy (liver resection/TACE)
218/281
0.437
Table 4 Multivariate analyses of factors that contributed to the overall survival rates
Variables
HR
95%CI
P value
Age < 60
1.129
0.981-1.282
0.121
PHT
1.228
0.908-1.556
0.262
NLR ≥ 4
1.431
0.992-1.781
0.128
Tumor diameter > 6 cm
1.328
1.002-1.783
0.048
Citation: Zhang DZ, Wei XD, Wang XP. Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(15): 4635-4643