Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2015; 21(1): 94-101
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.94
Table 1 Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiation therapy vs transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Ref.YearCountryPatient numberTACE + RT vs TACEChild-Pugh (CP-A:CP-B)Tumor thrombusTumor sizeResponse rateOver all survival
Koo et al[22]2010South Korea42 vs 2926:16 vs 17:12All patients had inferior vena cava tumor thrombus10 ± 4.0 vs 12 ±3.8 cm42.9% vs 13.8%1 yr OS 47.7% vs 17.2%
Zhang et al[24]2009China16 vs 2913:3 19:10Stenosis: occlusion< 10 cm : ≥ 10 cmN/A1 yr OS 32.5% vs 6.9%
14:2 vs 21:913:3 vs 21:8
Shim et al[25]2005South Korea38 vs 3533:5 vs 32:3yes: no10.2 vs 9.5cm65.8% vs N/A2 yr OS 36.8% vs 14.3%
12:26 vs 10:25
Zeng et al[20]2004China54 vs 149Non76% vs 31%1 yr OS 71.5% vs 59.6%
Table 2 Stereotactic body radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcionoma
Ref.Patient numberTumorBack groundMedian tumor volumeMedian dose (Gy)FractionFollow up (mo)Local controlOverall survivalAdverse effectAcute toxicity grade3Late toxicity grade3
Andolino et al[42]60HCCLC (CP-A: 36, CP-B: 24)3.2 cm443272 yr local control 90%2 yr OS 67%0%
N/A
Choi et al[44]20HCCLC (CP-A: 15, CP-B: 5), PVTT: 42-6.5 (3.8 cm)505-103-551 yr OS 70%0%
-232 yr sOS 43.1%N/A
Goodman et al[45]26metameta: 19, CCC: 5, HCC: 40.8-146.6 (32.6 cc)22.5-46.612-551 yr OS 64.3%0%
CCC-34.8-172 yr OS 50.4%N/A
HCC
Huang et al[46]36HCCLC (CP-A: 28, CP-B: 7, CP-C: 1)1.1-12.3 (4.4 cm)25-484-5141 yr in-field failure free rate 87.6%2 yr OS 72.6%2.8% (1: gastric ulcer)
-372 yr in-field failure free rate 75.1%N/A
Kwon et al[47]42HCCLC (CP-A: 38, CP-B: 4, CP-C: 0)15.4-81.8 (15.4 cc)30-3938.4-49.11 yr in-field progression-free survival rate 72.0%1 yr OS 72%0%
-28.73 yr in-field progression-free survival rate 68.0%3 yr OS 67.5%1% (1:liver failure)
Louis et al[36]25HCCLC (CP-A: 22, CP-B: 3)1.8-10.0 (4.5 cm)4531-241 yr local control rate 95%1 yr OS 79%4% (1: hepatic/epgastric pain)
-12.72 yr OS 52%10% (1: gastro duodenal ulcer,
1: hepatic toxicity)
Méndez Romero et al[48]25metameta: 17, HCC: 80.5-7.225-37.53-50.5-311 yr local control rate 94%1 yr OS 82%16% (1: pateient died in a hepatic tixicity and bleeding from varices.
HCC(3.2 cm)-12.92 yr local control rate 82%2 yr OS 54%3: hepatic toxicity.)
0%
Takeda et al[50]16HCCLC (CP-A: 14, CP-B: 2)3.4-72 (13.6 cm3)35-505-7 (6)8.1-33.11 yr local control rate 90% <All patients were alive0%
-20.40%
Tse et al[51]41HCCHCC (CP-A: 31), CCC (10)9-191324-54610.8-39.2 (17.6)1 yr in-field local control rate 65%1 yr OS 51%43% (13: hepatic toxicity, 1: hemato toxicity, 1: lethargy, 3 : nausea)
CCC(173 mL)-366% (1: GI bleeding, 1: bowel obstruction)