Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2014; 20(7): 1858-1870
Published online Feb 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1858
Published online Feb 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1858
Table 1 Randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis
Study | Agent | All subjects | Duration (yr) | Incident colorectal cancer cases | RR | 95%CI | |
Statin group | Control group | ||||||
JUPITER[43] | Rosuvastatin | 16304 | Median: 2.0 | 16 of 8154 | 28 of 8150 | 0.57 | 0.31-1.05 |
WOSCOPS[44] | Pravastatin | 6577 | Mean: 4.9 | 12 of 3291 | 20 of 3286 | 0.60 | 0.29-1.23 |
4S[47] | Simvastatin | 4444 | Median: 10.4 | 25 of 2221 | 32 of 2223 | 0.78 | 0.46-1.32 |
ALLHAT-LLT[46] | Pravastatin | 10355 | Mean: 4.8 | 461 of 5170 | 381 of 5185 | 1.21 | 0.79-1.86 |
HPS[45] | Simvastatin | 20536 | Mean: 5.0 | 114 of 10269 | 131 of 10267 | 0.87 | 0.68-1.12 |
LIPID[48] | Pravastatin | 9014 | Mean: 8.0 | 75 of 4512 | 71 of 4502 | 1.05 | 0.76-1.45 |
AFCAPS[5] | Lovastatin | 6605 | Mean: 5.2 | 251 of 3304 | 201 of 3301 | 1.25 | 0.70-2.24 |
CARE[4] | Pravastatin | 4159 | Mean: 4.8 | 12 of 2081 | 21 of 2078 | 0.57 | 0.28-1.16 |
Table 2 Cohort studies included in the meta-analysis
Study | Study location | All subjects | CRC cases | RR | 95%CI | Control for potential confounding factors2 |
Clancy et al[50], 2013 | Italy | 266109 | 2420 | 0.84 | 0.76-0.93 | 1-9 |
Leung et al[49], 2013 | Taiwan | 34205 | 654 | 0.57 | 0.45-0.721 | - |
Simon et al[51], 2012 | United States | 159219 | 2000 | 0.99 | 0.83-1.20 | 1, 4, 10-27 |
Jacobs et al[53], 2011 | United States | 133255 | 1739 | 1.03 | 0.94-1.141 | - |
Lee et al[52], 2011 | United States | 131922 | 1680 | 0.97 | 0.84-1.12 | 1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 28-34 |
Haukka et al[55], 2010 | Finland | 944962 | 5016 | 1.04 | 0.98-1.101 | - |
Matsushita et al[54], 2010 | Japan | 13724 | 76 | 1.22 | 0.77-1.94 | - |
Flick et al[57], 2009 | United States | 69115 | 171 | 0.89 | 0.61-1.30 | 1, 4, 6, 10-13, 15, 18, 19, 28, 35-38 |
Singh et al[56], 2009 | Canada | 413271 | 6637 | 1.13 | 1.02-1.25 | 1-4, 6, 7, 16, 39-42 |
Friedman et al[58], 2008 | United States | 4243067 | 5684 | 0.88 | 0.82-0.961 | - |
Farwell et al[59], 2008 | United States | 62842 | 687 | 0.65 | 0.55-0.78 | 1, 6, 11, 13, 19, 29, 43-53 |
Setoguchi et al[60], 2007 | United States | 31723 | 249 | 0.96 | 0.70-1.31 | 1-9, 39, 43, 54-64 |
Friis et al[61], 2005 | Denmark | 334754 | 3006 | 0.85 | 0.65-1.11 | 1, 2, 4, 16, 66 |
Table 3 Case-control studies included in the meta-analysis
Study | Study location | All subjects | CRC cases | OR | 95%CI | Control for potential confounding factors2 |
Deshpande[62], 2013 | United States | 73472 | 36736 | 0.96 | 0.89-1.05 | 1-4 |
Broughton et al[64], 2012 | United Kingdom | 233 | 101 | 0.43 | 0.25-0.80 | 1, 2, 5-8 |
Lakha et al[63], 2012 | United Kingdom | 603 | 309 | 0.33 | 0.15-0.69 | 1-3, 9-15 |
Cheng et al[65], 2011 | Taiwan | 5780 | 1156 | 1.09 | 0.91-1.30 | 1-3, 5, 8, 9, 16-21 |
Vinogradova et al[26], 2011 | United Kingdom | 60373 | 11749 | 1.07 | 1.00-1.15 | 1-3, 7, 9, 11, 12, 22-27 |
Robertson et al[66], 2010 | Denmark | 109769 | 9979 | 0.87 | 0.80-0.96 | 1, 2, 5-7, 9, 10, 19 |
Hachem et al[68], 2009 | United States | 30400 | 6080 | 0.91 | 0.86-0.96 | 1-4, 9, 16, 19, 20, 28, 29 |
Shadman et al[67], 2009 | United States | 2044 | 669 | 1.17 | 0.74-1.85 | 1, 4, 11, 12, 30-33 |
Boudreau et al[70], 2008 | United States | 1330 | 665 | 1.02 | 0.65-1.59 | 1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 12, 32 |
Yang et al[69], 2008 | United Kingdom | 48724 | 4432 | 1.10 | 0.50-2.20 | 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 32, 34 |
Hoffmeister et al[71], 2007 | Germany | 1154 | 540 | 0.69 | 0.45-1.06 | 1, 2, 4-7, 9, 11, 12, 30-32, 35-37 |
Coogan et al[72], 2007 | United States | 3618 | 1809 | 0.92 | 0.78-1.09 | 1, 2, 4, 9, 10 |
Li et al[73], 2006 | United States | 741 | 3391 | 0.8 | 0.34-1.87 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 30, 38 |
Poynter et al[25], 2005 | Israel | 3968 | 1953 | 0.53 | 0.38-0.74 | 1, 2, 9, 30, 36, 39-41 |
Rubin et al[74], 2005 | United States | 387240 | 18440 | 0.92 | 0.89-0.96 | 1, 2, 4, 9, 17, 42-45 |
Kaye et al[76], 2004 | United Kingdom | 18088 | 3291 | 1.0 | 0.6-1.7 | 1, 2, 11, 12, 42 |
Graaf et al[77], 2004 | Netherlands | 20105 | 2921 | 0.87 | 0.48-1.57 | 1, 2, 5, 9, 17, 18, 32, 34, 46-49 |
Khurana et al[75], 2004 | United States | 534273 | 53391 | 0.94 | 0.89-1.00 | 1, 2, 6, 9, 12, 38, 50 |
Blais et al[78], 2000 | Canada | 5962 | 561 | 0.83 | 0.37-1.89 | 1, 2, 14, 18, 34, 46 |
Table 4 Meta-analysis results
No. of studies | Fixed-effects model | Random-effects model | Tests of homogeneity | Tests of publication bias | ||||||
RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | Q value (df) | P value | I2 | Begg’s P value | Egger’s P value | ||
Randomized Controlled Trials | 8 | 0.90 | 0.78-1.04 | 0.89 | 0.74-1.07 | 9.31 (7) | 0.23 | 25% | 0.22 | 0.31 |
Placebo-controlled RCTs | 7 | 0.86 | 0.74-1.01 | 0.85 | 0.71-1.03 | 7.21 (6) | 0.30 | 17% | 0.18 | 0.24 |
RCTs of lipophilic statins | 3 | 0.90 | 0.73-1.10 | 0.90 | 0.73-1.10 | 1.55 (2) | 0.46 | 0% | 0.60 | 0.70 |
RCTs of lipophobic statins | 5 | 0.90 | 0.73-1.12 | 0.83 | 0.60-1.15 | 7.75 (4) | 0.10 | 48% | 0.62 | 0.05 |
Cohort Studies | 13 | 0.96 | 0.93-0.99 | 0.91 | 0.83-1.00 | 70.85 (12) | < 0.001 | 83% | 0.54 | 0.22 |
Case-control studies | 19 | 0.93 | 0.91-0.96 | 0.92 | 0.87-0.98 | 50.31 (18) | < 0.001 | 64% | 0.46 | 0.27 |
Published in full text form | 16 | 0.94 | 0.91-0.98 | 0.90 | 0.83-0.99 | 49.12 (15) | < 0.001 | 69% | 0.47 | 0.19 |
Observational studies | 32 | 0.94 | 0.92-0.96 | 0.92 | 0.87-0.96 | 122.68 (31) | < 0.001 | 75% | 0.36 | 0.16 |
All studies | 40 | 0.94 | 0.92-0.96 | 0.91 | 0.87-0.96 | 132.3 (39) | < 0.001 | 71% | 0.33 | 0.11 |
- Citation: Lytras T, Nikolopoulos G, Bonovas S. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 studies. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(7): 1858-1870
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i7/1858.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1858