Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2014; 20(6): 1574-1581
Published online Feb 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1574
Published online Feb 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1574
Table 1 Reader performance grouped according to polyp size
| Polyps size | GI radiologist (95%CI) | Radiology resident (95%CI) | GI fellow 1 (95%CI) | GI fellow 2 (95%CI) |
| Polyps 6-9 mm | ||||
| Sensitivity (n = 20 pts with polyps at OC) | 85% (62%-97%) | 90% (68%-99%) | 80% (56%-94%) | 80% (56%-94%) |
| False Positives (n = 70 pts without polyps at OC) | 10% (4%-20%) | 10% (4%-20%) | 11.4% (5%-21%) | 10% (4%-20%) |
| Overall Accuracy (n = 90) | 88.9% (81%-95%) | 89.8% (81%-95%) (n = 88) | 86.7% (78%-93%) | 87.8% (79%-94%) |
| Polyps > 9 mm | ||||
| Sensitivity (n = 10 pts with polyps at OC) | 70% (35%-93%) | 70% (35%-93%) | 90% (55%-100%) | 70% (35%-93%) |
| False Positives (n = 80 pts without polyps at OC) | 3.8% (0.8%-11%) | 0% (0%-5%) | 3.8% (0.8%- 11%) | 2.5% (0.3%-9%) |
| Overall accuracy | 93.3% (86%-98%) | 98.9% (94%-100%) | 95.6% (89%-99%) | 94.4% (88%-98%) |
- Citation: Rosenfeld G, Fu YTN, Quiney B, Qian H, Krygier D, Brown J, Vos P, Tiwari P, Telford J, Bressler B, Enns R. Does training and experience influence the accuracy of computed tomography colonography interpretation? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(6): 1574-1581
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i6/1574.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1574