Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2014; 20(48): 18427-18431
Published online Dec 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18427
Published online Dec 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18427
n | 0 mo | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | |||||||||
FPG mmol/L | 2 h PBG mmol/L | HbA1c | FPG mmol/L | 2 h PBG mmol/L | HbA1c | FPG mmol/L | 2 h PBG mmol/L | HbA1c | FPG mmol/L | 2 h PBG mmol/L | HbA1c | ||
Traditional group | 26 | 10.7 ± 1.2 | 13.8 ± 3.2 | 10.7% ± 1.2% | 7.5 ± 1.3a | 10.2 ± 1.8a | 9.8% ± 1.1% | 10.1 ± 1.5c | 13.1 ± 2.8c | 10.1% ± 1.4%c | 10.3 ± 1.4c | 13.6 ± 3.1c | 10.5% ± 1.3%c |
Modified group | 28 | 10.5 ± 1.1 | 14.1 ± 2.9 | 10.5% ± 1.1% | 6.9 ± 1.2a | 9.9 ± 2.2a | 10.2% ± 1.3% | 6.5 ± 1.3a | 9.2 ± 2.4a | 7.2% ± 1.1%a | 6.4 ± 1.2a | 8.9 ± 2.6a | 5.5% ± 1.1%a |
- Citation: Xiong SW, Zhang DY, Liu XM, Liu Z, Zhang FT. Comparison of different gastric bypass procedures in gastric carcinoma patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(48): 18427-18431
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i48/18427.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18427