Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2014; 20(46): 17297-17304
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17297
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17297
Ref. | Procedure | No. of patients | Endoscopic findings (%) | Symptom (%) | Change of body weight (%) | |||||
Esophagitis | Food residue | Bile reflux | Gastritis | Reflux | Fullness | Dumping | ||||
Matsuki et al[21], 2012 | PPG | 433 | 11 | 19 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 94 | |
Morita et al[24], 2013 | PPG | 408 | 6 | 28 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 92 |
Ikeguchi et al[25], 2010 | PPG | 24 | 35 | 71 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 97 | ||
DG-B1 | 30 | 26 | 16 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 90 | |||
Park do et al[26], 2008 | PPG | 22 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 32 | ||||
DG-B1 | 17 | 25 | 17 | 46 | 40 | |||||
Nunobe et al[27], 2007 | PPG | 194 | 6 | 22 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 93.9 | |
DG-B1 | 203 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 90.2 | ||
Tomita et al[28], 2003 | PPG | 10 | 0 | 60 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 94.3 | |
DG-B1 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 64 | 68 | 18 | 23 | 91.3 | ||
Yamaguchi et al[29], 2004 | PPG | 28 | 61 | 28 | 20 | 44 | 12 | 94.6 | ||
DG-B1 | 58 | 33 | 57 | 27 | 36 | 36 | 91.3 | |||
Nakane et al[30], 2000 | PPG | 25 | 4 | 56 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 90 |
DG-B1 | 25 | 8 | 36 | 40 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 93 |
Ref. | Procedure | No. of patients | Endoscopic findings (%) | Symptom (%) | Change of body weight (%) | ||||
Esophagitis | Stenosis | Food residue | Reflux | Fullness | Dumping | ||||
Masuzawa et al[41], 2014 | PG-EG | 49 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 87 | |||
PG-JI | 32 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 86 | ||||
TG-RY | 122 | 12 | 3 | 8 | 85 | ||||
Nozaki et al[42], 2013 | PG-JI | 102 | 3 | 32 | 88 | ||||
TG-RY | 49 | 2 | 86 | ||||||
Katai et al[43], 2010 | PG-JI | 128 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 88.9 | ||
Katai et al[44], 2003 | PG-JI | 45 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 88.5 | |||
Tokunaga et al[45], 2008 | PG-EG | 36 | 30 | ||||||
short-PG-JI | 18 | 9 | |||||||
long-PG-JI | 22 | 0 | |||||||
Ahn et al[46], 2013 | LAPG-EG | 50 | 32 | 12 | |||||
LATG-RY | 81 | 4 | 5 | ||||||
An et al[47], 2008 | PG-EG | 89 | 29 | 38 | 86.4 | ||||
TG-RY | 334 | 2 | 7 | 87.4 | |||||
Yoo et al[48], 2004 | PG-EG | 74 | 16 | 35 | |||||
TG-RY | 185 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
Tokunaga et al[50], 2009 | PG-EG | 38 | 8 | 3 | 86 | ||||
PG-JI | 45 | 9 | 22 | 86 | |||||
Ahn et al[52], 2013 | LAPG-EG | 50 | 8 | 32 | 94 | ||||
LAPG-DT | 43 | 5 | 49 | 5 | 12 | 96.3 | |||
Nomura et al[53], 2014 | PG-JI | 10 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 91.2 | |||
PG-DT | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 87.1 |
PG-EG | PG-JI | PG-DT | |
Advantage | Short operation time | Low incidence of reflux esophagitis | Low incidence of reflux esophagitis |
Low incidence of DGE | |||
Disadvantage | High incidence of reflux esophagitis | Long operation time | Long operation time |
High incidence of anastomotic stenosis | High incidence of DGE | Sometimes difficult for endoscopic evaluation of remnant stomach |
- Citation: Saito T, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S, Mori M, Doki Y. Current status of function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(46): 17297-17304
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i46/17297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17297