Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2014; 20(44): 16765-16773
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16765
Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis
Ref.CountryEthnicityControl sourceCancer typeGenotype distribution (case/control)
P for HWE
Asp312Asn
Lys751Gln
Asp/AspAsp/AsnAsn/AsnLys/LysLys/GlnGln/GlnAsp312AsnLys751Gln
Xing et al[21] 2002ChinaChinesePBESCC381/46149/623/1367/45163/703/30.470.87
Xing et al[22] 2003ChinaChinesePBESCC286/33838/451/0278/33144/493/30.220.43
Yu et al[23]2004ChinaChineseHBESCC121/13614/160/0108/13316/1711/20.490.11
Casson et al[24] 2005CanadaCaucasianHBEADC---31/3421/464/15-0.93
Ye et al[25]2006SwedenSwedishPBEADC31/17651/23714/5727/19851/20318/710.090.11
ESCC30/17641/23710/5723/19844/20314/710.090.11
Sobti et al[26] 2007IndiaIndianHBESCC---52/6361/777/20-0.64
Doecke et al[27] 2008AustraliaMixedPBEADC---108/575123/58832/174-0.22
Ferguson et al[28] 2008IrelandCaucasianPBEADC---80/9194/12134/35-0.61
Tse et al[19] 2008United StatesMixedHBEADC117/199150/20643/49104/193159/20849/520.690.72
Pan et al[29] 2009United StatesCaucasianHBESCC16/20120/1851/4817/18718/2163/530.580.43
EADC137/201163/18543/48137/187153/21656/530.580.43
Zhai et al[30] 2009ChinaChineseHBESCC---167/14831/512/1-0.12
Huang et al[29] 2012ChinaChineseHBESCC171/29842/600/0150/27455/798/50.080.80
Li et al[31] 2013ChinaChinesePBESCC342/35156/472/2283/321105/7312/60.750.43
Table 2 Results of the meta-analysis for the xeroderma pigmentosum group D Asp312Asn polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility
Study groupCo-dominant model
Dominant model
Recessive model
Additive model
Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp
Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asp
Asn/Asn+Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp
Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asn+Asp/Asp
(2Asn/Asn+Asp/Asn) vs 2(Asp/Asn+Asn/Asn+Asp/Asp)
OR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPh
Total1.17 (1.02, 1.33)0.030.971.30 (1.00, 1.70)0.050.751.18 (1.04, 1.34)0.010.981.17 (0.91, 1.50)0.220.711.10 (1.00, 1.21)0.061.00
Cancer type
ESCC1.09 (0.91, 1.31)0.350.950.99 (0.54, 1.79)0.960.481.09 (0.91, 1.30)0.350.990.93 (0.53, 1.63)0.790.401.06 (0.90, 1.24)0.490.99
EADC1.26 (1.03, 1.53)0.020.971.40 (1.04, 1.89)0.030.931.29 (1.07, 1.55)0.010.991.24 (0.94, 1.64)0.130.901.12 (0.99, 1.28)0.070.98
Ethnicity
Chinese1.08 (0.88, 1.33)0.450.882.08 (0.57, 7.60)0.270.661.10 (0.90, 1.35)0.360.932.06 (0.57, 7.51)0.270.651.10 (0.91, 1.33)0.340.98
Non-Chinese1.23 (1.03, 1.47)0.020.951.27 (0.97, 1.67)0.080.541.24 (1.05, 1.47)0.010.931.14 (0.89, 1.47)0.310.531.10 (0.98, 1.23)0.110.92
Table 3 Results of the meta-analysis for the xeroderma pigmentosum group D Lys751Gln polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility
Study groupCo-dominant model
Dominant model
Recessive model
Additive model
Lys/Gln vs Lys/Lys
Gln/Gln vs Lys/Lys
Gln/Gln+LysGln vs Lys/Lys
Gln/Gln vs Lys/Gln+Lys/Lys
(2Gln/Gln+Lys/Gln) vs 2(Lys/Gln+Gln/Gln+Lys/Lys)
OR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPhOR (95%CI)PPh
Total1.11 (0.94, 1.31)0.200.011.31 (0.98, 1.75)0.070.031.14 (0.96, 1.35)0.140.0011.21 (1.02, 1.43)0.030.111.10 (0.99, 1.22)0.100.02
Cancer type
ESCC1.13 (0.89, 1.42)0.310.031.44 (1.01, 2.06)0.050.061.16 (0.91, 1.49)0.230.011.26 (0.90, 1.77)0.170.081.13 (0.94, 1.36)0.210.02
EADC1.09 (0.85, 1.40)0.510.021.26 (1.02, 1.56)0.030.051.11 (0.85, 1.44)0.450.011.19 (0.98, 1.45)0.080.251.07 (0.98, 1.18)0.130.22
Ethnicity
Chinese1.10 (0.82, 1.47)0.530.022.49 (1.44, 4.29)0.0010.641.18 (0.88, 1.60)0.270.012.37 (1.38, 4.10)0.0020.651.21 (0.94, 1.56)0.150.02
Non-Chinese1.12 (0.91, 1.38)0.300.031.13 (0.82, 1.56)0.450.021.11 (0.89, 1.39)0.350.011.12 (0.93, 1.34)0.230.141.06 (0.98, 1.15)0.160.27