Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2014; 20(4): 1038-1047
Published online Jan 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.1038
Table 1 Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical test-1 and -max for colorectal cancer detection at different positive thresholds n (%)
Hemoglobin concentration (ng/mL)FIT strategyIndividuals with a positive result1Sensitivity2Specificity2Positive predictive value2Negative predictive value2Positive likelihood ratio2Negative likelihood ratio2
50FIT1367 (8.6)100 (90-100)92 (90-94)7 (0-15)100 (100-100)12.48 (9.83-15.85)-
FITmax4101 (13.0)100 (90-100)88.60 (85-90)5 (0-10)100 (100-100)8.06 (6.69-9.72)-
75FIT1361 (7.8)100 (90-100)93 (91-95)8 (0-16)100 (100-100)13.82 (10.74-17)-
FITmax489 (11.4)100 (90-100)89 (87-91)6 (0-11)100 (100-100)9.21 (7.53-11.28)-
100FIT1355 (7.1)100 (90-100)94 (92-95)9 (1-18)100 (100-100)15.48 (11.84-20.24)-
FITmax482 (10.5)100 (90-100)90 (88-92)6 (0-12)100 (100-100)10.05 (8.13-12.43)-
115FIT1351 (6.5)100 (90-100)94 (92-96)10 (1-19)100 (100-100)16.83 (12.71-22.7)-
FITmax479 (10.1)100 (90-100)90 (88-93)6 (0-12)100 (100-100)10.46 (8.42-12.99)-
150FIT1348 (6.2)80 (35-100)94 (93-96)8 (0-17)100 (100-100)14.07 (8.33-23.76)0.21 (0.04-1.22)
FITmax470 (9.0)80 (35-100)91 (89-94)6 (0-12)100 (100-100)9.38 (5.72-15.40)0.22 (0.04-1.26)
200FIT1345 (5.8)80 (35-100)95 (93-96)9 (0-18)100 (100-100)15.10 (8.89-25.66)0.21 (0.04-1.22)
FITmax459 (7.6)80 (35-100)93 (91-95)7 (0-14)100 (100-100)11.26 (6.78-18.69)0.22 (0.04-1.24)
Table 2 Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical test-1 and -max for advanced neoplasia1 detection at different thresholds
Hemoglobin concentration (ng/mL)FIT strategyIndividuals with a positive result2Sensitivity3P4Specificity3P5Positive predictive value3Negative predictive value3Positive likelihood ratio3Negative likelihood ratio3
50FIT1667 (8.6)35 (25-45)0.0695 (93-97)0.00151 (38-63)91 (89-93)7.24 (4.72-11.13)0.68 (0.59-0.79)
FITmax7101 (13.0)42 (32-53)0.0391 (89-93)< 0.00141 (31-51)92 (90-94)4.98 (3.44-6.72)0.63 (0.53-0.75)
75FIT1661 (7.8)33 (23-43)0.296 (94-97)0.0152 (39-66)91 (89-93)7.76 (4.92-12.23)0.70 (0.61-081)
FITmax789 (11.4)40 (30-51)0.193 (91-95)0.0344 (33-55)92 (89-94)5.48 (3.82-7.87)0.65 (0.55-0.76)
100FIT1655 (7.1)32 (22-42)0.596 (95-98)0.556 (42-70)91 (89-93)9.08 (5.57-14.80)0.71 (0.61-0.81)
FITmax782 (10.5)37 (27-47)193 (91-95)0.544 (33-55)91 (89-93)5.50 (3.76-8.05)0.67 (0.58-0.79)
115FIT1651 (6.5)30 (20-40)97 (95-98)57 (42-71)91 (88-93)9.27 (5.56-15.46)0.72 (0.64-0.83)
FITmax779 (10.1)36 (26-46)94 (92-95)44 (33-56)91 (89-93)5.59 (3.79-8.26)0.68 (0.59-0.79)
150FIT1648 (6.2)28 (18-37)0.597 (96-98)156 (41-71)90 (88-93)9.04 (5.33-15.34)0.74 (0.66-0.84)
FITmax770 (9.0)32 (22-42)0.194 (92-96)0.0644 (32-57)91 (88-93)5.59 (3.67-8.51)0.72 (0.63-0.83)
200FIT1645 (5.8)28 (18-37)0.597 (96-99)0.160 (44-75)90 (88-93)10.55 (6.04-18.41)0.74 (0.65-0.84)
FITmax759 (7.6)28 (18-37)0.0895 (94-97)< 0.00146 (32-59)90 (88-93)5.93 (3.72-9.45)0.76 (0.67-0.86)
Table 3 Number of colonoscopies needed to detect one lesion and cost per lesion (€) according to positivity threshold and fecal immunochemical test testing strategy
LesionPositivity threshold (ng/mL)No. need to scope
Cost per lesion detected (€)
Cost increment (€)
FIT1FITmaxFIT1FITmax
CRC0155.8016898
5013.4020.202206348958.16
7512.2017.802038322358.15
10011.0016.401912305559.78
11510.2015.801814298564.55
15012.0017.502163345159.55
20011.2514.752075308348.58
Advanced neoplasia108.20889
50 1.97 2.4631742534.07
75 1.91 2.2831241332.37
100 1.77 2.2830242440.40
115 1.76 2.2630642639.22
150 1.78 2.2631244542.63
200 1.67 2.1931145646.62

  • Citation: Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Gonzalez-Mao MC, Iglesias F, Rivera C, Iglesias MB, Cid L, Castro I, Castro L, Vega P, Hermo JA, Macenlle R, Martínez-Turnes A, Martínez-Ares D, Estevez P, Cid E, Vidal MC, López-Martínez A, Hijona E, Herreros-Villanueva M, Bujanda L, investigators JIRPTCS. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(4): 1038-1047
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i4/1038.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.1038