Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Table 1 Institutions and patients included
Institution | n |
Hospital de Navarra | 8 |
Clinica Universidad de Navarra | 5 |
Hospital Gregorio Marañon | 10 |
Hospital Juan Canalejo | 10 |
Hospital Puerta de Hierro | 9 |
Hospital del Mar | 8 |
Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo | 9 |
Hospital La Fe | 10 |
Hospital General de Valencia | 10 |
Mutua de Tarrassa | 10 |
Total | 89 |
Table 2 PillCam SB24 specifications
Physical dimensions | 26 mm × 11 mm |
Weight | 2.89 ± 0.15 g |
Number of imaging heads | 1 |
Imager type | CMOS |
Image capture rate | 4 frames per second |
Optical illumination | 4 white light emitting diodes with ALC |
Field of view | 156° - working distance of 4.5 mm |
Depth of field | 0-30 mm |
Mucosa area images at 4.5 mm | Approximately 1100 mm2 |
Magnification | 1.8 |
Min. detectable object size | 0.1 mm |
Min. operation time | 7 h and 58 min |
Max. operation time | 9:00 h |
Shelf life | 10 mo after manufacturing date |
Transmitter frequency | 434.1 MHz |
Battery type | Silver oxide, non-toxic |
Storage temperature | 0°-30° |
Activation | Magnetic, automatic from blister |
Table 3 Overall number of lesions and abnormal frames detected n (%)
Lesions | Frames | |
Total | Total | |
Esophagus | 17 (6.6) | 132 (4) |
Stomach | 30 (11.6) | 617 (19.1) |
Small bowel | 193 (75) | 2227 (69) |
Colon | 17 (6.6) | 249 (7.7) |
Total | 257 (100) | 3225 (100) |
Table 4 Comparative analysis of landmark detection n (%)
SB24 patients | “SB2-like” patients | P value | K value | |
Z-line | 53 (59.5) | 45 (50.6) | NS | 0.820 |
Papilla | 7 (7.9) | 6 (6.7) | NS | 0.917 |
Table 5 Comparative analysis of frames per landmark n (%)
SB24 | "SB2-like" | P value | |||
Frames | Mean ± SD | Frames | Mean ± SD | ||
Z-line | 616 | 11.6 ± 20.4 | 391 | 8.6 ± 10.6 | NS |
Papilla | 35 | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 15 | 2.5 ± 1.4 | < 0.05 |
Table 6 Comparative analysis of quality of images detected
Quality1 | SB24 | “SB2-like” | P value |
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
91.94 ± 21.82 | 88.01 ± 34.87 | NS |
Table 7 Lesions detection: Per-patient analysis n (%)
Table 8 Lesions detection: Per-lesion analysis
SB24 | “SB2-like” | P value | |||
Lesions | Mean ± SD | Lesions | Mean ± SD | ||
Esophagus | 17 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 14 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | NS |
Stomach | 30 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 30 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | NS |
Small bowel | 193 | 2.2 ± 3.1 | 183 | 2.1 ± 2.8 | NS |
Colon | 17 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 17 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | NS |
Total | 257 | 2.9 ± 3.8 | 244 | 2.7 ± 3.5 | NS |
Table 9 Comparative analysis of frames per lesion
SB24 | “SB2-like” | P value | |||
Frames | Mean ± SD | Frames | Mean ± SD | ||
Esophagus | 132 | 7.7 ± 9.0 | 91 | 6.5 ± 8.7 | NS |
Stomach | 617 | 20.5 ± 34.2 | 403 | 13.4 ± 25.8 | NS |
Small Bowel | 2227 | 11.5 ± 28.1 | 1490 | 8.1 ± 18.1 | NS |
Colon | 249 | 14.6 ± 18.2 | 155 | 9.1 ± 12.4 | NS |
Total | 3225 | 12.8 ± 15.2 | 2139 | 8.7 ± 15.6 | NS |
- Citation: Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borobio E, Borda A, Estevez E, Galter S, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Gonzalez B, Lujan M, Martinez JL, Martínez V, Menchén P, Navajas J, Pons V, Prieto C, Valle J. Capsule endoscopy capture rate: Has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14472.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472