Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2014; 20(38): 13767-13774
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13767
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13767
Table 1 Results of population-based screening in Japan
Stomach | Colon and rectum | Lung | Breast | Cervix | |
Total participants | 3874128 | 6975281 | 7059318 | 2541993 | 4666826 |
Screening rate | 9.6% | 16.8% | 17.2% | 18.8% | 23.7% |
Positive rate | 9.4% | 7.3% | 2.8% | 8.6% | 1.6% |
Participant rate of diagnostic examination | 81.1% | 63.6% | 77.7% | 83.5% | 66.2% |
Cancer detection rate | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.06% | 0.32% | 0.08% |
Positive predictive value | 1.9 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 4.9 |
Table 2 Sensitivity of endoscopy and radiography for gastric cancer screening
Screening round | Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sensitivity |
By the detection method | By the detection method | By the incidence method | ||
Prevalence screening | Endoscopic screening | 0.955 | 0.851 | 0.886 |
(0.875-0.991) | (0.843-0.859) | (0.698-0.976) | ||
Radiographic screening | 0.893 | 0.856 | 0.831 | |
(0.718-0.977) | (0.846-0.865) | (0.586-0.964) | ||
Incidence screening | Endoscopic screening | 0.977 | 0.888 | 0.954 |
(0.919-0.997) | (0.883-0.892) | (0.842-0.994) | ||
Radiographic screening | 0.885 | 0.891 | 0.855 | |
(0.664-0.972) | (0.885-0.896) | (0.637-0.970) |
Table 3 Results of prediction based on a combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen screening
Ohata et al[38] | Watabe et al[40] | Mizuno et al[39] | |
Basic characteristics | |||
Year published | 2004 | 2005 | 2009 |
Location | Wakayama | Chiba | Kyoto |
Total number | 4655 | 6983 | 2859 |
Men/Women | 4655/0 | 3320/2260 | 1011/1848 |
Age | 48.3 (average) | 48.9 (average) | ≥ 35 |
Follow-up (yr) | 7.7 (average) | 4.7 (average) | 10 (maximum) |
HP positive rate (%) | 78.6 | 46.1 | 75 |
PG positive rate (%) | 28.9 | 21.8 | 39.2 |
Number of detected cancer | 45 | 43 | 61 |
Incidence of gastric cancer (/1000) | 9.67 | 6.16 | 21.3 |
HP-/PG- | |||
Total number | 967 | 3324 | 647 |
Number of detected cancer | 0 | 7 | 2 |
Incidence of gastric cancer (/1000) | - | 2.11 | 3.09 |
HP+/PG- | |||
Total number | 2341 | 2134 | 1094 |
Number of detected cancer | 19 | 6 | 15 |
Incidence of gastric cancer (/1000) | 8.12 | 2.81 | 13.71 |
HP+/PG+ | |||
Total number | 1316 | 1082 | 1054 |
Number of detected cancer | 24 | 18 | 41 |
Incidence of gastric cancer (/1000) | 18.24 | 16.64 | 38.9 |
HP-/PG+ | |||
Total number | 31 | 443 | 69 |
Number of detected cancer | 2 | 12 | 3 |
Incidence of gastric cancer (/1000) | 64.52 | 27.09 | 43.48 |
Table 4 Biomarker development process
Phase No. | Aim | Detail |
Phase 1 | Preclinical Exploratory | Promising directions identified |
Phase 2 | Clinical Assay and Validation | Clinical assay detects established disease |
Phase 3 | Retrospective Longitudinal | Biomarker detects disease early before it becomes clinical and a “screen positive” rule is defined |
Phase 4 | Prospective Screening | Extent and characteristics of disease detected by the test and the false referral rate are identified |
Phase 5 | Cancer Control | Impact of screening on reducing the burden of disease on the population is quantified |
- Citation: Hamashima C. Current issues and future perspectives of gastric cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(38): 13767-13774
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i38/13767.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13767