Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2014; 20(35): 12509-12516
Published online Sep 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12509
Table 1 Summary of articles n (%)
YearPatientsEndoscopiesPatients with nonmalignant colonic polyps/neoplasiaPatients with malignancyComments
Krones et al[32]2006512NRNR28 (5.5)Looked at patients with malignancy and synchronous diverticulosis and patients with diverticulosis/diverticulitis and synchronous or metachronous malignancy
Lam et al[33]2010288NR23 (8)5 (1.7)Looked at all patients with diverticulitis. Reviewed pathology report for those undergoing resection
Lau et al[34]20111088319 (29.3)82 (26)9 (2.8)Recommend routine colonic evaluation, especially in patients with complicated diverticulitis
Brar et al[35]2013458249 (54.4)77 (30.9)4 (1.6)Age and abscess are independent predictors of malignancy on multivariate analysis
Elmi et al[36]20131034402 (38.9)78 (19.4)9 (2.2)Also evaluated CT findings and risk of malignancy
Total:260 (20.7)55 (3.1)
Table 2 Recent systematic reviews n (%)
YearIncluded articlesPatientsEndoscopiesPatients with nonmalignant colonic polyps/neoplasiaPatients with malignancyComments
Sai et al[37]201210771430 (55.8)NR14 (2.1)Patients evaluated within 24 wk with surgery, colonoscopy, or barium enema
Sharma et al[38]20141133581970 (58.7)220 (19.5)22 (1.6)Also examined uncomplicated vs complicated diverticulitis and found proportional estimate of risk of 0.7% and 10.8%, respectively
de Vries et al[39]2014924901468 (59)278 (19.9)17 (1.16)Only examined patients presenting with uncomplicated diverticulitis
Daniels et al[40]2014817961796 (100)1363 (20.2)29 (1.6)