Akbulut S, Sevmis S, Karakayali H, Bayraktar N, Unlukaplan M, Oksuz E, Dagdeviren A. Amifostine enhances the antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of UW and HTK preservation solutions. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(34): 12292-12300 [PMID: 25232264 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12292]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sami Akbulut, Associate Professor, FICS, FACS, Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Malatya 44280, Turkey. akbulutsami@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Transplantation
Article-Type of This Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2014; 20(34): 12292-12300 Published online Sep 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12292
Table 1 Pathological changes after hepatectomy
Groups
Time
n
SD
CLHC
BD
FC
(+)
(-)
(+)
(-)
(+)
(-)
(+)
(-)
RL
0 h
8
1
7
2
6
1
7
0
8
6 h
8
2
6
4
4
2
6
0
8
12 h
8
5
3
7
1
4
4
1
7
RL + A
0 h
8
2
6
2
6
0
8
0
8
6 h
8
1
7
0
8
2
6
0
8
12 h
8
3
5
4
4
2
6
0
8
HTK
0 h
8
1
7
0
8
0
8
1
7
6 h
8
4
4
4
4
1
7
0
8
12 h
8
3
5
4
4
2
6
1
7
HTK + A
0 h
8
0
8
0
8
0
8
0
8
6 h
8
2
6
1
7
0
8
0
8
12 h
8
1
7
2
6
1
7
1
7
UW
0 h
8
1
7
0
8
0
8
0
8
6 h
8
4
4
4
4
0
8
1
7
12 h
8
3
5
3
5
1
7
1
7
UW + A
0 h
8
0
8
0
8
0
8
0
8
6 h
8
1
7
1
7
0
8
0
8
12 h
8
1
7
1
7
0
8
0
8
Table 2 Distribution of apoptotic cells detected with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining
Groups
n
0 h
6 h
12 h
RL
8
148 ± 26
185 ± 22
229 ± 41
RL + A
8
144 ± 25
166 ± 24
172 ± 24
P value
0.40
0.36
0.05
HTK
8
111 ± 30
144 ± 46
169 ± 42
HTK + A
8
101 ± 19
126 ± 16
133 ± 14
P value
0.45
0.45
0.04
UW
8
100 ± 23
115 ± 25
158 ± 24
UW + A
8
90 ± 16
100 ± 21
116 ± 18
P value
0.42
0.44
0.01
Table 3 Intergroup comparisons after inducible nitric oxide syntetase grading
Time
G
RL
RL + A
HTK
HTK + A
UW
UW + A
n = 8
n = 8
n = 8
n = 8
n = 8
n = 8
0 h
0
0
3
4
4
7
6
I
3
2
2
4
0
1
II
3
2
2
0
1
1
III
2
1
0
0
0
0
P value
0.590
0.26
0.24
6 h
0
0
1
1
3
1
4
I
4
0
5
4
6
3
II
4
6
2
1
1
1
III
0
1
0
0
0
0
P value
0.055
0.02
0.51
12 h
0
1
1
0
2
0
2
I
0
2
1
4
3
5
II
1
4
5
1
3
1
III
6
2
2
1
2
0
P value
0.030
0.05
0.04
Table 4 Intergroup comparison of nitric oxide levels in liver preservation solutions
Groups
n
0 h
6 h
12 h
RL
8
0.79 ± 0.22
1.15 ± 0.24
1.78 ± 0.26
RL + A
8
0.73 ± 0.18
1.26 ± 0.18
1.34 ± 0.23
P value
0.690
0.61
0.022
HTK
8
0.64 ± 0.19
1.09 ± 0.19
1.71 ± 0.15
HTK + A
8
0.71 ± 0.19
0.80 ± 0.10
1.04 ± 0.13
P value
0.590
0.06
0.016
UW
8
0.81 ± 0.18
1.02 ± 0.34
1.31 ± 0.98
UW + A
8
0.46 ± 0.21
0.60 ± 0.14
0.69 ± 0.13
P value
0.033
0.01
0.020
Table 5 Alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels after hepatectomy
Groups
0 h
6 h
12 h
ALP
ALT
ALP
ALT
ALP
ALT
RL
2.6 ± 1.9
17.6 ± 9.8
55.9 ± 7.5
90.4 ± 16.2
82.1 ± 7.8
370.1 ± 73.8
RL + A
1.9 ± 0.8
15.8 ± 7.4
25.0 ± 3.3
84.4 ± 14.1
44.0 ± 6.0
309.5 ± 46.1
HTK
1.1 ± 0.3
19.4 ± 6.4
33.1 ± 6.2
60.6 ± 7.1
50.4 ± 6.5
172.6 ± 22.5
HTK + A
1.9 ± 1.3
23.4 ± 8.4
25.4 ± 3.5
41.4 ± 2.8
35.3 ± 4.2
110.9 ± 9.8
UW
1.3 ± 0.4
27.8 ± 7.5
32.0 ± 4.6
59.1 ± 5.9
46.9 ± 6.2
188.3 ± 76.5
UW + A
2.1 ± 2.2
16.6 ± 5.1
22.6 ± 5.3
41.6 ± 6.6
28.3 ± 5.6
80.0 ± 7.5
Citation: Akbulut S, Sevmis S, Karakayali H, Bayraktar N, Unlukaplan M, Oksuz E, Dagdeviren A. Amifostine enhances the antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of UW and HTK preservation solutions. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(34): 12292-12300