Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2014; 20(30): 10570-10576
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10570
Table 1 Synchronous neoplasms detected during preoperative colonoscopy
Synchronous polyp (n)Synchronous cancer (n)
Ascending colonHigh-grade adenoma (1)
Low-grade adenoma (7)
Transverse colonLow-grade adenoma (7)
Descending colonLow-grade adenoma (4)
Sigmoid colonLow-grade adenoma (3)Adenocarcinoma (1)
RectumLow-grade adenoma (3)Adenocarcinoma (1)
Table 2 Factors that affected complete colonoscopy n (%)
Complete colonoscopy group (n = 30)Incomplete colonoscopy group (n = 18)P value
Age (mean ± SD)65.3 ± 13.661.3 ± 11.40.30
Sex (M/F)18/1210/80.76
BMI (mean ± SD)23.3 ± 3.2523.2 ± 2.960.86
Abdomen OP8 (26.6)2 (11)0.28
History
T stage (T3/T4)24/613/50.53
N stage10/9/103/9/60.25
(N0/N1/N2)
Tumor location0.13
Proximal T colon10
Splenic flexure12
Descending72
SD junction10
Sigmoid17 (56.6)9 (50.0)
RS junction15
Rectum20
Tumor located at2 (6.7)6 (33.3)0.04
An angle
Tumor length6.25 ± 2.44 cm6.06 ± 2.45 cm0.79
(mean ± SD)
Stent placement7 (23.3)10 (55.6)0.02
at an angle
Stent expansion19.96 ± 2.6815.13 ± 2.84< 0.01
diameter
(mean ± SD, mm)
Stent length9.4 ± 2.118.6 ± 1.370.19
(mean ± SD, cm)
Stent placement7.93 ± 1.858.11 ± 1.850.74
to colonoscopy
(mean ± SD, d)
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of factors for successful complete colonoscopy through the stent
Odds ratio95%CIPvalue
Stent diameter ≥ 17 mm58.35.08-668.58< 0.01
Stent located at angle1.880.26-13.440.53
Tumor located at angle5.830.36-92.360.21