Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2014; 20(29): 9898-9911
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9898
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9898
Treatment | Regimen | Comment |
First-line therapies | ||
Standard triple therapy | A PPI (standard dose, bid), amoxicillin (1 g, bid) and clarithromycin (500 mg, bid) for 14 d | Widely used option |
Only suitable for areas with < 20% incidence of cam resistance or as tailored treatment. | ||
Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy | A PPI (standard dose, bid), bismuth (standard dose, qid) tetracycline (500 mg, qid) and metronidazole (500 mg, qid) for 10-14 d | Works independently to CAM and largely overcome MNZ resistance |
Valuable second-line treatment after failure of CAM-based regimens | ||
Patient-friendly monocapsule available | ||
Suitable for patients with penicillin allergy | ||
Non-availability of bismuth and/or tetracycline in some countries | ||
Sequential therapy | A 5-d dual therapy with a PPI (standard dose, bid) and amoxicillin (1 g, bid) followed by a 5-d triple therapy with a PPI (standard dose, bid), clarithromycin (500 mg, bid) and metronidazole (500 mg, bid) | Widely evaluated option |
Probably effective in high resistance settings | ||
Questionable efficacy against double-resistant strains | ||
Less satisfactory results in more recent studies contacted outside Italy | ||
Non-bismuth quadruple “Concomitant” therapy | A PPI (standard dose, bid), clarithromycin (500 mg, bid), amoxicillin (1 g, bid) and metronidazole (500 mg, bid) for 10 d | Probably effective in high resistance settings |
Larger number of pills compared to sequential and hybrid therapies | ||
Hybrid therapy | A 7-d dual therapy with a PPI (standard dose, bid) and amoxicillin (1 g, bid) followed by a 7-d quadruple therapy with a PPI (standard dose, bid), amoxicillin (1 g, bid), clarithromycin (500 mg, bid) and metronidazole (500 mg, bid) | Probably effective in high resistance settings |
Few data available on its efficacy/safety | ||
Second-line/rescue therapies | ||
Levofloxacin-based triple therapy | A PPI (standard dose, bid), levofloxacin (500 mg, bid) and amoxicillin (1 g, bid) for 10 d | Works independently to CAM and MNZ |
Ineffective for high quinolone resistance settings (> 10%) | ||
Rapid development of quinolone resistance | ||
Rifabutin-based triple therapy | A PPI (standard dose, bid), rifabutin (150 mg bid) and amoxicillin (1 g bid) for 14 d | Third or more rescue option |
Significant safety issues | ||
Development of mycobacterium resistance |
-
Citation: Papastergiou V, Georgopoulos SD, Karatapanis S. Treatment of
Helicobacter pylori infection: Meeting the challenge of antimicrobial resistance. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(29): 9898-9911 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i29/9898.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9898