Tao F, Ye MF, Sun AJ, Lv JQ, Xu GG, Jing YM, Wang W. Prognostic significance of nuclear hepatoma-derived growth factor expression in gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9564-9569 [PMID: 25071353 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9564]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Feng Tao, MD, Professor, Chief, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, No. 568 Zhongxing North Road, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang Province, China. tf_zjsx@aliyun.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9564-9569 Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9564
Table 1 Hepatoma-derived growth factor expression in tissues from malignant gallbladder cancer and cholelithiasis groups n (%)
Tissue types
Cases (n)
Nuclear HDGF
Cytoplasmic HDGF
Positive cases
χ2
P value
Positive cases
χ2
P value
GBC
40
31 (77.5)
20.05
< 0.001
13 (32.5)
1.003
0.317
Cholelithiasis
40
11 (21.5)
9 (22.5)
Table 2 Association between hepatoma-derived growth factor expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of gallbladder cancer n (%)
Parameter
Category
Cases (n)
HDGF
Positive cases
χ2
P value
Age
< 60
9
8 (88.9)
0.227
0.634
≥ 60
31
23 (74.2)
Sex
Male
11
7 (63.6)
0.755
0.385
Female
29
24 (82.8)
Histopathological subtypes
High
8
3 (37.5)
8.027
0.018
Middle
14
12 (85.7)
Low
18
16 (88.9)
TNM stage
0-I
5
1 (20.0)
7.349
0.007
II-IV
35
30 (85.7)
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
19
14 (73.7)
0.029
0.865
Positive
21
17 (83.0)
Perineural invasion
Absent
12
5 (41.7)
9.858
0.002
Present
28
26 (92.9)
Gallbladder stones
Negative
17
14 (82.4)
0.152
0.697
Positive
23
17 (77.3)
Table 3 Correlation between patient survival time and hepatoma-derived growth factor expression
Survival time
Cases (n)
HDGF
Positive cases
χ2
P value
< 1 yr
28
25 (89.3)
5.352
0.021
≥ 1 yr
12
6 (50.0)
Table 4 Univariate log-rank analysis of disease-specific survival
Parameter
Category
Cases (n)
Mean survival time (mo) 95%CI
P value
Age
< 60
8
14.8 (4.3-25.2)
0.930
≥ 60
32
14.3 (9.2-19.4)
Sex
Male
11
20.2 (10.4-30.1)
0.142
Female
29
12.7 (7.9-17.5)
Histopathological subtypes
High
8
30.4 (21.5-39.2)
0.003
Middle
14
12.1 (5.6-18.5)
Low
18
7.2 (4.8-9.7)
TNM stage
0-I
5
36.0 (36.0-36.0)
0.015
II-IV
35
11.4 (7.4-15.4)
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
19
19.4 (11.4-27.4)
0.005
Positive
21
9.1 (4.4-13.8)
Perineural invasion
Absent
12
27.6 (18.3-37.0)
0.013
Present
28
10.3 (6.3-14.2)
HDGF
Negative
9
32.1 (22.1-42.2)
0.001
Positive
31
9.6 (6.1-13.1)
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival
Parameter
Category
HR
95%CI
P value
HDGF expression
Negative
4.298
1.134-88.887
0.038
Positive
TNM stage
0-I
0.008
0.084-15.014
0.930
II-IV
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
4.368
1.060-6.134
0.037
Positive
Histopathological subtypes
High
2.061
0.828-3.402
0.151
Middle
Low
Perineural invasion
Absent
0.073
0.218-3.170
0.787
Present
Citation: Tao F, Ye MF, Sun AJ, Lv JQ, Xu GG, Jing YM, Wang W. Prognostic significance of nuclear hepatoma-derived growth factor expression in gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9564-9569