Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9286-9291
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9286
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9286
Sites of treatment failure for IV or IP 5-FU | ||||
No. of patients | No. of recurrences | Peritoneal surface | Liver | |
IP 5-FU | 36 | 13 (36) | 2/10 | 3/11 |
IV 5-FU | 30 | 11 (37) | 10/11 | 4/11 |
Statistical analysis P2 | 0.003 | 1.000 |
1Biopsy-proven cancer nodule(s) on any peritoneal surface including the primary cancer (T4) |
1Positive biopsy or pathologic enlargement of an ovary |
1Cancer at the surgical margin of resection (R-1) |
Perforation through the malignancy (iatrogenic by colonoscopy or spontaneous) |
Positive peritoneal cytology |
Adjacent organ involvement or fistula formation |
Lymph nodes positive at the margins of resection |
Rupture of the primary cancer during resection |
Credits | Debits |
Long-term survival in 50% of patients | Many patients treated for a few to benefit |
Selection factors have been well defined | The surgical technology is complex and requires an extended learning curve |
An important addition to the MDT for management of colorectal malignancy | Referral by medical oncologist are often late with a large extent of disease |
Morbidity (10%) and mortality (1%) at experienced centers is acceptable | So far a uniform HIPEC treatment has not emerged; perioperative chemotherapy needs to be optimized |
- Citation: Sugarbaker PH. Update on the prevention of local recurrence and peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9286-9291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i28/9286.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9286