Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2014; 20(25): 8221-8228
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8221
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8221
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with symptoms or signs of gastrointestinal bleeding n (%)
Age, mean ± SD, yr | 64.46 ± 13.79 (n =129) |
Gender, Male | 91 (70.5) |
Co-morbidities | |
Hypertension | 48 (37.2) |
Diabetes mellitus | 33 (25.6) |
Cardiovascular disease | 17 (13.2) |
Liver cirrhosis | 39 (30.2) |
Chronic kidney disease | 14 (10.9) |
Cerebrovascular disease | 22 (17.1) |
Malignancy | 25 (19.4) |
Initial vital sign | |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 119.52 ± 25.67 |
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 72.33 ± 17.53 |
Pulse rate, mean ± SD | 85.31 ± 15.78 |
Initial hemoglobin, g/dL | 9.55 ± 2.62 |
Bleeding related signs or symptoms | |
Melena | 46 (35.7) |
Hematemesis | 43 (33.3) |
Hematochezia | 28 (21.7) |
Anemia | 12 (9.3) |
Non-bleeding related signs or symptoms | |
Dizziness | 14 (10.9) |
Epigastric pain | 13 (10.1) |
Syncope | 2 (1.6) |
Dyspnea | 2 (1.6) |
Table 2 Bleeding sources confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy n (%)
Patients n =129 | |
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding | 81 (62.8) |
Esophagus | 20 (15.5) |
Esophageal varices | 17 (13.1) |
Esophageal ulcers | 3 (2.3) |
Stomach | 53 (41.1) |
Gastric ulcers | 35 (27.1) |
Gastric varices | 8 (6.2) |
Hemorrhagic gastritis | 4 (3.2) |
Mallory-Weiss syndrome | 3 (2.3) |
Cancer | 2 (1.5) |
Angiodysplasia | 1 (0.8) |
Duodenum | 8 (6.2) |
Duodenal ulcers | 7 (5.4) |
Angiodysplasia | 1 (0.8) |
Non upper gastrointestinal bleeding | 36 (27.9) |
Small bowel bleeding | 8 (6.2) |
Colorectum | 23 (17.8) |
Colitis | 9 (6.9) |
Ulcers | 7 (5.4) |
Cancers | 2 (1.5) |
Diverticulum | 2 (1.5) |
Hemorrhoid | 1 (0.8) |
Rectal varices | 1 (0.8) |
Radiation colitis | 1 (0.8) |
Others | 5 (4) |
Hemoptysis | 4 (3.2) |
Nasal bleeding | 1 (0.8) |
No definite focus of bleeding | 12 (9.3) |
Table 3 Procedural results of EG scan and nasogastric tube aspiration n (%)
Patients n = 129 | |||
EG scan | NG tube aspiration | P value | |
Procedure time, mean ± SD, min | 5.49 ± 2.33 | ||
Examiner | |||
Endoscopist | 24 (18.6) | 0 | |
Non-endoscopist | 105 (81.4) | 129 (100) | |
Insertion to stomach | 128 (99.2) | 129 (100) | |
Insertion to duodenum | 4 (3.1) | ||
Main findings | |||
Blood | 59 (45.7) | 75 (58.1) | 0.061 |
Food material | 27 (20.9) | 12 (9.3) | 0.014 |
Esophageal lesions1 | 41 (31.8) | ||
Stomach lesions1 | 9 (7.0) | ||
Duodenal lesions | 0 | ||
Adverse effects | |||
Nasal pain | 60 (46.5) | 40 (31) | 0.015 |
Nausea | 26 (20.1) | 5 (3.9) | < 0.001 |
Epistaxis | 11 (8.5) | 28 (21.7) | 0.005 |
Cough | 9 (6.9) | 11 (8.5) | 0.817 |
Others | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.6) | 1.000 |
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EG scan and nasogastric aspiration for upper gastrointestinal bleeding identification
Overall n = 129 | Esophagus n = 68 | |||||
EG scan | NG tube | P value | EG scan | NG tube | P value | |
Sensitivity | 64.2 (52/81) | 74.1 (60/81) | > 0.05 | 95 (19/20) | 90 (18/20) | > 0.05 |
Specificity | 85.4 (41/48) | 68.8 (33/48) | 0.008 | 85.4 (41/48) | 68.8 (33/48) | 0.008 |
Accuracy | 72.1 (93/129) | 72.1 (93/129) | > 0.05 | 88.2 (60/68) | 75 (51/68) | 0.004 |
Table 5 Comparison of EG scan outcomes between endoscopists and non-endoscopists n (%)
Endoscopists n = 24 | Non-endoscopists n = 105 | P value | |
Procedure time, mean ± SD, min | 4.33 ± 1.76 | 5.75 ± 2.36 | 0.001 |
Insertion to duodenum | 1 (4.2) | 3 (2.9) | 0.657 |
Main findings | |||
Blood | 10 (41.7) | 49 (46.7) | 0.821 |
Esophageal lesions | 6 (25) | 35 (33.3) | 0.478 |
Stomach lesions | 2 (8.3) | 7 (6.7) | 0.673 |
Accuracy for UGI bleeding | 16 (66.7) | 77 (73.3) | 0.614 |
- Citation: Choi JH, Choi JH, Lee YJ, Lee HK, Choi WY, Kim ES, Park KS, Cho KB, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS. Comparison of a novel bedside portable endoscopy device with nasogastric aspiration for identifying upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(25): 8221-8228
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i25/8221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8221