Eum YO, Park JK, Chun J, Lee SH, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB, Yoon CJ, Han HS, Hwang JH. Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(22): 6924-6931 [PMID: 24944484 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6924]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jin-Hyeok Hwang, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, South Korea. pdoctor7@snu.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Evidence-Based Medicine
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2014; 20(22): 6924-6931 Published online Jun 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6924
Table 1 Strasberg classification of biliary injury
Class
Description
A
Injury to small ducts in continuity with biliary system, with cystic duct leak
B
Injury to sectoral duct with consequent obstruction
C
Injury to sectoral duct with consequent bile leak from a duct not in continuity with biliary system
D
Injury lateral to extrahepatic ducts
E1
Stricture located > 2 cm from bile duct confluence
E2
Stricture located < 2 cm from bile duct confluence
E3
Stricture located at bile duct confluence
E4
Stricture involving right and left bile ducts
E5
Complete occlusion of all bile ducts
Table 2 Study patients n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 77)
Age (yr, range)
49.94 (20-81)
Sex
Male
46 (60)
Disease
GB stones with/without CBD stones
52 (68)
IHD stones
11 (14)
Others1
14 (18)
Operation
Laparoscopic surgery
49 (64)
Open laparotomy
28 (36)
Bile duct exploration
43 (56)
Time to diagnosis [median, d (IQR)]
13 (5-90)
Follow up period [median, d (IQR)]
339 (200-817)
Table 3 Characteristics of study patients according to types of bile duct injurys n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 77)
BDI type
Type 1 (leak only)
36 (47)
Type 2 (stricture only)
31 (40)
Type 3 (combined)
10 (13)
BDI type (Strassberg classification)
Type A
36 (47)
Type B
10 (13)
Type C
31 (40)
Type D
0 (0)
Length of stricture, mm (median)
3.2 (2.3-3.7)
Size of bile leak, mm (median)
6 (2-12)
Table 4 Treatment success rate according to clinical characteristics n (%)
Success rate
P value
Overall
59/77 (77)
Age (yr)
0.467
≤ 50
32/40 (80)
> 50
27/37 (73)
Sex
0.101
Female
27/31 (69)
Male
32/46 (77)
Bile duct exploration
0.291
Yes
31/43 (72)
No
28/34 (82)
Operation method
0.387
Laparoscopic
36/49 (74)
Open
23/28 (82)
Operation name
0.247
Cholecystectomy
40/55 (72)
Other operations
19/22 (86)
Initial procedure
0.547
Endoscopic
28/38 (74)
Percutaneous
31/39 (80)
EST
0.310
Yes
28/39 (72)
No
31/38 (82)
BDI
0.000
Type 1
34/36 (94)
Type 2
22/31 (71)
Type 3
3/10 (30)
Time to diagnosis (d)
0.325
≤ 15
34/42 (81)
> 15
25/35 (71)
Treatment duration (d)
0.950
≤ 30
30/39 (77)
> 30
29/38 (76)
Table 5 Clinical Characteristics according to bile duct injury type
BDI type
1
2
3
P value
Patients (n)
36
31
10
Age (mean, yr)
50
52
44
0.321
Male
56%
65%
60%
0.756
Bile duct exploration
44%
65%
70%
0.161
Laparoscopic surgery
72%
48%
80%
0.067
Cholecystectomy
64%
74%
90%
0.246
Endoscopic sphincterotomy
31%
54%
78%
0.059
Complication rate
11%
36%
20%
0.056
Time to diagnosis (median, d)
6
216
11
0.000
Table 6 Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with bile duct injury type 3
Sex/age
Result
Operation
Time to diagnosis (d)
Number of procedures
Treatment duration (d)
Leak location
Stricture location
ERC
PTC
PCD
F/37
Success
Cholecystectomy
10
2
7
2
180
Multiple
Anastomosis
M/40
Failure
Cholecystectomy
5
1
1
0
5
IHD
IHD/
F/26
Success
Cholecystectomy
59
2
0
1
94
CBD/CHD
CBD/CHD
M/22
Failure
Cholecystectomy
21
0
3
0
69
CBD/CHD
CBD/CHD
F/50
Failure
Cholecystectomy
5
1
2
0
13
Duct stump
IHD
M/45
Failure
Cholecystectomy
0
1
0
0
45
CBD/CHD
CBD/CHD
M/25
Failure
Cholecystectomy
13
1
1
0
7
CBD/CHD
CBD/CHD
M/45
Failure
Rt. hepatectomy
12
0
1
1
45
IHD
IHD
F/65
Success
Cholecystectomy
60
5
0
0
364
CBD/CHD
CBD/CHD
M/81
Failure
Cholecystectomy
8
1
5
4
482
Duct stump
IHD
Table 7 Subgroup analyses of 55 patients who underwent cholecystectomy n (%)
Success rate
P value
Overall
40/55 (73)
Age (yr)
0.428
≤ 50
14/21 (67)
> 50
26/34 (775)
Sex
0.359
Female
17/21 (81)
Male
23/34 (68)
Bile duct exploration
0.185
Yes
16/25 (64)
No
24/30 (80)
Operation method
1.000
Laparoscopic
29/40 (73)
Open
11/15 (73)
EST
0.537
Yes
25/36 (69)
No
15/19 (79)
BDI
0.001
Type 1
22/23 (96)
Type 2
15/23 (65)
Type 3
3/9 (33)
Time to diagnosis (d)
0.322
≤ 15
22/28 (79)
> 15
18/27 (68)
Treatment duration (d)
1.000
≤ 30
17/24 (71)
> 30
23/31 (74)
Citation: Eum YO, Park JK, Chun J, Lee SH, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB, Yoon CJ, Han HS, Hwang JH. Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(22): 6924-6931