Evidence-Based Medicine
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2014; 20(22): 6924-6931
Published online Jun 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6924
Table 1 Strasberg classification of biliary injury
ClassDescription
AInjury to small ducts in continuity with biliary system, with cystic duct leak
BInjury to sectoral duct with consequent obstruction
CInjury to sectoral duct with consequent bile leak from a duct not in continuity with biliary system
DInjury lateral to extrahepatic ducts
E1Stricture located > 2 cm from bile duct confluence
E2Stricture located < 2 cm from bile duct confluence
E3Stricture located at bile duct confluence
E4Stricture involving right and left bile ducts
E5Complete occlusion of all bile ducts
Table 2 Study patients n (%)
VariablesTotal (n = 77)
Age (yr, range)49.94 (20-81)
Sex
Male46 (60)
Disease
GB stones with/without CBD stones52 (68)
IHD stones11 (14)
Others114 (18)
Operation
Laparoscopic surgery49 (64)
Open laparotomy28 (36)
Bile duct exploration43 (56)
Time to diagnosis [median, d (IQR)]13 (5-90)
Follow up period [median, d (IQR)]339 (200-817)
Table 3 Characteristics of study patients according to types of bile duct injurys n (%)
VariablesTotal (n = 77)
BDI type
Type 1 (leak only)36 (47)
Type 2 (stricture only)31 (40)
Type 3 (combined)10 (13)
BDI type (Strassberg classification)
Type A36 (47)
Type B10 (13)
Type C31 (40)
Type D0 (0)
Length of stricture, mm (median)3.2 (2.3-3.7)
Size of bile leak, mm (median)6 (2-12)
Table 4 Treatment success rate according to clinical characteristics n (%)
Success rateP value
Overall59/77 (77)
Age (yr)0.467
≤ 5032/40 (80)
> 5027/37 (73)
Sex0.101
Female27/31 (69)
Male32/46 (77)
Bile duct exploration0.291
Yes31/43 (72)
No28/34 (82)
Operation method0.387
Laparoscopic36/49 (74)
Open23/28 (82)
Operation name0.247
Cholecystectomy40/55 (72)
Other operations19/22 (86)
Initial procedure0.547
Endoscopic28/38 (74)
Percutaneous31/39 (80)
EST0.310
Yes28/39 (72)
No31/38 (82)
BDI0.000
Type 134/36 (94)
Type 222/31 (71)
Type 33/10 (30)
Time to diagnosis (d)0.325
≤ 1534/42 (81)
> 1525/35 (71)
Treatment duration (d)0.950
≤ 3030/39 (77)
> 3029/38 (76)
Table 5 Clinical Characteristics according to bile duct injury type
BDI type123P value
Patients (n)363110
Age (mean, yr)5052440.321
Male56%65%60%0.756
Bile duct exploration44%65%70%0.161
Laparoscopic surgery72%48%80%0.067
Cholecystectomy64%74%90%0.246
Endoscopic sphincterotomy31%54%78%0.059
Complication rate11%36%20%0.056
Time to diagnosis (median, d)6216110.000
Table 6 Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with bile duct injury type 3
Sex/ageResultOperationTime to diagnosis (d)Number of procedures
Treatment duration (d)Leak locationStricture location
ERCPTCPCD
F/37SuccessCholecystectomy10272180MultipleAnastomosis
M/40FailureCholecystectomy51105IHDIHD/
F/26SuccessCholecystectomy5920194CBD/CHDCBD/CHD
M/22FailureCholecystectomy2103069CBD/CHDCBD/CHD
F/50FailureCholecystectomy512013Duct stumpIHD
M/45FailureCholecystectomy010045CBD/CHDCBD/CHD
M/25FailureCholecystectomy131107CBD/CHDCBD/CHD
M/45FailureRt. hepatectomy1201145IHDIHD
F/65SuccessCholecystectomy60500364CBD/CHDCBD/CHD
M/81FailureCholecystectomy8154482Duct stumpIHD
Table 7 Subgroup analyses of 55 patients who underwent cholecystectomy n (%)
Success rateP value
Overall40/55 (73)
Age (yr)0.428
≤ 5014/21 (67)
> 5026/34 (775)
Sex0.359
Female17/21 (81)
Male23/34 (68)
Bile duct exploration0.185
Yes16/25 (64)
No24/30 (80)
Operation method1.000
Laparoscopic29/40 (73)
Open11/15 (73)
EST0.537
Yes25/36 (69)
No15/19 (79)
BDI0.001
Type 122/23 (96)
Type 215/23 (65)
Type 33/9 (33)
Time to diagnosis (d)0.322
≤ 1522/28 (79)
> 1518/27 (68)
Treatment duration (d)1.000
≤ 3017/24 (71)
> 3023/31 (74)