Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5283-5293
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5283
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5283
Table 1 Treatment regimens proposed for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in different geographic areas
Treatment | Asia-Pacific region[13] | Developing countries[14] | Europe[15] | United States[16] |
First-line | Triple therapy | Triple therapy | Triple therapy | Triple therapy |
(PPI + CLA + AMO/MET) | (PPI + CLA + AMO/FUR) | (PPI-CLA-containing regimen) | (PPI + CLA + AMO/MET) | |
BIS-based quadruple therapy | Quadruple therapy | BIS-based quadruple therapy | BIS-based quadruple therapy | |
(PPI + BIS + MET + TET) | (PPI + CLA + AMO + BIS/MET or PPI + BIS + MET + TET) | (for high clarithromycin resistance) | (BIS + MET + TET + RAN) | |
Sequential therapy | Sequential therapy | |||
Sequential therapy | (for high clarithromycin resistance) | (PPI + AMO and PPI + CLA + TIM) | ||
(PPI + AMO and PPI + CLA + NIT) | ||||
Second-line | BIS-based quadruple therapy | BIS-based quadruple therapy | BIS-based quadruple therapy | BIS-based quadruple therapy |
(PPI + BIS + MET + TET) | (PPI + BIS + TET + MET/FUR) | LEV-based triple therapy | (PPI + TET + BIS + MET) | |
LEV-based triple therapy | LEV-based triple therapy: | LEV-based triple therapy | ||
(PPI + LEV + AMO) | (PPI + LEV + BIS/FUR/AMO) | (PPI + AMO + LEV) | ||
RIF-based triple therapy | ||||
(PPI + RIF + AMO) | ||||
Third-line | RIF-based triple therapy | LEV-based or FUR-based triple therapy | Guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing | |
(PPI + RIF + AMO) | (PPI + AMO + LEV/RIF or | |||
PPI + FUR + LEV) |
Africa | Asia | Europe | United States | |
Amoxicillin | 17.8% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 2.2% |
Clarithromycin | 13.4% | 21.0% | 11.1% | 29.3% |
Metronidazole | 86.2% | 38.1% | 17.0% | 44.1% |
Levofloxacin | NA | 14.0% | 24.1% | NA |
Table 3 Use of different high dose dual therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection
Author | Role | Regiment | Patients, n | Eradication rate | ||||
ITT | PP | CYP2C19 | ||||||
EM | IM | PM | ||||||
Bayerdörffer et al[99] | 1st | OME 40 mg and AMO 750 mg tid for 14 d | 139 | 89.0% | 90.6% | |||
Miehlke et al[110] | 2nd | OME 40 mg and AMO 750 mg qid for 14 d | 41 | 75.6% | 83.8% | |||
Furuta et al[100] | 2nd | RAB 10 mg and AMO 500 mg qid for 14 d | 12 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100% | ||
Furuta et al[111] | 2nd | LAN 30 mg and AMO 500 mg qid for 14 d | 32 | 96.9% | 95.7% | 100% | 100% | |
Shirai et al[112] | 2nd | RAB 10 mg and AMO 500 mg qid | 66 | 90.9% | 93.8% | |||
Graham et al[113] | 1st | ESO 40 mg and AMO 750 mg tid for 7 d | 36 | 72.2% | 74.2% | |||
Kim et al[114] | 1st | LAN 30 mg and AMO 750 mg tid for 14 d | 104 | 67.3% | 78.4% | |||
Goh et al[115] | 2nd | RAB 20 mg and AMO 1 g tid for 14 d | 149 | 71.8% | 75.4% |
-
Citation: Yang JC, Lu CW, Lin CJ. Treatment of
Helicobacter pylori infection: Current status and future concepts. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5283-5293 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i18/5283.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5283