Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045
Table 1 Profiles of all patients
Patients who underwent 1st EGD | Patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent EGD | P value | |
Gender | NS | ||
Male | 98 | 1060 | |
Female | 82 | 731 | |
Operator | NS | ||
a | 128 | 1144 | |
b | 49 | 599 | |
c | 0 | 28 | |
d | 2 | 16 | |
e | 1 | 4 | |
Age group (yr) | 49.3 ± 13.2 54 | 58.3 ± 11.5 | < 0.05 |
< 39 | 39 | 115 | |
40-49 | 45 | 320 | |
50-59 | 29 | 464 | |
60-69 | 13 | 588 | |
> 70 | 304 | ||
Insertion route | < 0.05 | ||
Transnasal | 139 | 1255 | |
Transoral | 41 | 536 | |
VAS score | 4.50 ± 2.33 | 4.11 ± 2.35 | < 0.05 |
Examination time (s) | NS | ||
306.0 ± 60.0 | 302.1 ± 61.8 | ||
Type of scope | NS | ||
a | 78 | 690 | |
b | 66 | 739 | |
c | 19 | 162 | |
d | 8 | 69 | |
e | 4 | 36 | |
f | 3 | 67 | |
g | 2 | 28 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses against the visual analog scale scores in patients who underwent 1st esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Patients who underwent 1st EGD | VAS score | Univariate | Multivariate |
Gender | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | |
Male | 4.02 ± 2.15 | ||
Female | 5.06 ± 2.42 | ||
Operator | NS | NS | |
a | 4.47 ± 2.30 | ||
b | 4.51 ± 2.49 | ||
c | - | ||
d | 6 | ||
e | 4 | ||
Age group | NS | NS | |
< 39 | 4.93 ± 2.12 | ||
40-49 | 4.44 ± 2.54 | ||
50-59 | 4.11 ± 2.33 | ||
60-69 | 4.34 ± 2.18 | ||
> 70 | 4.54 ± 2.93 | ||
Insertion route | NS | NS | |
Transnasal | 4.50 ± 2.26 | ||
Transoral | 4.46 ± 2.59 | ||
Examination time (s) | P < 0.05 | NS | |
r2 = 0.0336 | |||
Type of scope | NS | NS | |
a | 4.60 ± 2.36 | ||
b | 4.76 ± 2.33 | ||
c | 3.95 ± 2.41 | ||
d | 3.13 ± 1.64 | ||
e | 5.25 ± 2.75 | ||
f | 2.33 ± 1.53 | ||
g | 4 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses against the visual analog scale scores in patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent EGD | VAS score | Univariate | Multivariate |
Gender | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | |
Male | 3.60 ± 2.20 | ||
Female | 4.84 ± 2.37 | ||
Operator | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | |
a | 3.95 ± 2.36 | ||
b | 4.43 ± 2.34 | ||
c | 3.57 ± 2.04 | ||
d | 4.69 ± 2.06 | ||
e | 2.50 ± 1.00 | ||
Age-group | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | |
< 39 | 4.99 ± 2.32 | ||
40-49 | 4.34 ± 2.49 | ||
50-59 | 4.19 ± 2.31 | ||
60-69 | 3.99 ± 2.27 | ||
> 70 | 3.63 ± 2.31 | ||
Insertion route | P < 0.05 | NS | |
Transnasal | 4.19 ± 2.27 | ||
Transoral | 3.93 ± 2.53 | ||
Examination time (s) | NS | NS | |
r2 = 0.000843 | |||
Type of scope | NS | NS | |
a | 4.22 ± 2.35 | ||
b | 4.11 ± 2.36 | ||
c | 3.93 ± 2.29 | ||
d | 3.98 ± 2.48 | ||
e | 4.64 ± 2.11 | ||
f | 3.25 ± 2.24 | ||
g | 3.82 ± 2.57 |
Table 4 Jonckheere-Terpstra test of the visual analog scale score and age group in addition to gender and insertion route
Jonckheere-Terpstra test | P value | ||
Male-transnasal insertion | NS | NS | P < 0.05 |
Female-transnasal insertion | NS | ||
Male-transoral insertion | NS (P = 0.0833) | P < 0.05 | |
Female-transorai insertion | P < 0.05 |
- Citation: Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Takahashi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Nakayama C, Minatsuki C, Matsuda R, Hirayama-Asada I, Tsuji Y, Mochizuki S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Ozeki A, Matsumoto L, Ohike Y, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Evaluation of preferable insertion routes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy using ultrathin endoscopes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i17/5045.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045