Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Takahashi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Nakayama C, Minatsuki C, Matsuda R, Hirayama-Asada I, Tsuji Y, Mochizuki S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Ozeki A, Matsumoto L, Ohike Y, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Evaluation of preferable insertion routes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy using ultrathin endoscopes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050 [PMID: 24803817 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Satoshi Ono, MD, PhD, Assistant professor, Center for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. satoshi-tky@umin.ac.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050 Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045
Table 1 Profiles of all patients
Patients who underwent 1st EGD
Patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent EGD
P value
Gender
NS
Male
98
1060
Female
82
731
Operator
NS
a
128
1144
b
49
599
c
0
28
d
2
16
e
1
4
Age group (yr)
49.3 ± 13.2 54
58.3 ± 11.5
< 0.05
< 39
39
115
40-49
45
320
50-59
29
464
60-69
13
588
> 70
304
Insertion route
< 0.05
Transnasal
139
1255
Transoral
41
536
VAS score
4.50 ± 2.33
4.11 ± 2.35
< 0.05
Examination time (s)
NS
306.0 ± 60.0
302.1 ± 61.8
Type of scope
NS
a
78
690
b
66
739
c
19
162
d
8
69
e
4
36
f
3
67
g
2
28
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses against the visual analog scale scores in patients who underwent 1st esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Patients who underwent 1st EGD
VAS score
Univariate
Multivariate
Gender
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
Male
4.02 ± 2.15
Female
5.06 ± 2.42
Operator
NS
NS
a
4.47 ± 2.30
b
4.51 ± 2.49
c
-
d
6
e
4
Age group
NS
NS
< 39
4.93 ± 2.12
40-49
4.44 ± 2.54
50-59
4.11 ± 2.33
60-69
4.34 ± 2.18
> 70
4.54 ± 2.93
Insertion route
NS
NS
Transnasal
4.50 ± 2.26
Transoral
4.46 ± 2.59
Examination time (s)
P < 0.05
NS
r2 = 0.0336
Type of scope
NS
NS
a
4.60 ± 2.36
b
4.76 ± 2.33
c
3.95 ± 2.41
d
3.13 ± 1.64
e
5.25 ± 2.75
f
2.33 ± 1.53
g
4
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses against the visual analog scale scores in patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent EGD
VAS score
Univariate
Multivariate
Gender
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
Male
3.60 ± 2.20
Female
4.84 ± 2.37
Operator
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
a
3.95 ± 2.36
b
4.43 ± 2.34
c
3.57 ± 2.04
d
4.69 ± 2.06
e
2.50 ± 1.00
Age-group
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
< 39
4.99 ± 2.32
40-49
4.34 ± 2.49
50-59
4.19 ± 2.31
60-69
3.99 ± 2.27
> 70
3.63 ± 2.31
Insertion route
P < 0.05
NS
Transnasal
4.19 ± 2.27
Transoral
3.93 ± 2.53
Examination time (s)
NS
NS
r2 = 0.000843
Type of scope
NS
NS
a
4.22 ± 2.35
b
4.11 ± 2.36
c
3.93 ± 2.29
d
3.98 ± 2.48
e
4.64 ± 2.11
f
3.25 ± 2.24
g
3.82 ± 2.57
Table 4 Jonckheere-Terpstra test of the visual analog scale score and age group in addition to gender and insertion route
Jonckheere-Terpstra test
P value
Male-transnasal insertion
NS
NS
P < 0.05
Female-transnasal insertion
NS
Male-transoral insertion
NS (P = 0.0833)
P < 0.05
Female-transorai insertion
P < 0.05
Citation: Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Takahashi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Nakayama C, Minatsuki C, Matsuda R, Hirayama-Asada I, Tsuji Y, Mochizuki S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Ozeki A, Matsumoto L, Ohike Y, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Evaluation of preferable insertion routes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy using ultrathin endoscopes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050