Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4244-4255
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244
Primary tumor (T) | |
Tx | Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
T0 | No evidence of primary tumor |
Tis | Carcinoma in situ |
T1 | Tumor invades submucosa |
T2 | Tumor invades muscularis propria |
T3 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria and into perirectal tissues |
T4a | Tumor penetrates to the surface of the visceral peritoneum |
T4b | Tumor directly invades or is adherent to other organs or structures |
Regional lymph nodes (N) | |
Nx | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed |
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis |
N1 | Metastases in 1-3 regional lymph nodes |
N1a | Metastasis in 1 regional lymph node |
N1b | Metastases in 2-3 regional lymph nodes |
N1c | Tumor deposit(s) in the subserosa, mesentery, pericolic, or perirectal tissues without regional nodal metastasis |
N2 | Metastases in 4 or more regional lymph nodes |
N2a | Metastases in 4-6 regional lymph nodes |
N2b | Metastases in 7 or more regional lymph nodes |
Distant metastasis (M) | |
M0 | No distant metastasis |
M1 | Distant metastasis |
M1a | Metastasis confined to 1 organ or site (e.g., liver, lung, ovary, non-regional node, external iliac lymph node) |
M1b | Metastases in > 1 organ/site or the peritoneum |
Imaging modalities | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Preoperative staging | ||
EUS | Depth of tumor invasion in early rectal cancer | Limited field of view Perirectal invasion and LN metastasis |
CT | Wide availability Fast scanning time | Local staging and CRM involvement in lower rectal cancer |
MRI | High soft tissue resolution Local staging and CRM involvement | Distant metastasis |
PET/CT | Distant metastasis | Poor spatial resolution Perirectal invasion and CRM involvement |
Post-therapeutic restaging | ||
EUS | None | Low accuracy of T staging and LN staging |
CT | Relatively high accuracy of CRM status | Relatively low accuracy of T staging and LN staging |
MRI | High specificity of therapeutic response assessment High accuracy of CRM involvement | Relatively poor sensitivity |
PET/CT | Distant metastasis | No standard parameter and follow-up protocol |
- Citation: Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(15): 4244-4255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i15/4244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244