Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4141-4150
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4141
Table 1 Comparison of classifications
Okuda staging system[13]
Score
01
Tumor size ≤ 50% of the liver> 50% of the liver
Albumin (g/dL)≥ 3< 3
Bilirubin (mg/dL)< 3≥ 3
AscitesAbsentPresent
CLIP score[14]
Score
012
Tumour morphologyUninodular and extension ≤ 50%Multinodular and extension ≤ 50%Massive or extension > 50%
Child–Pugh scoreABC
Alpha-fetoprotein (ng ⁄ mL)< 400≥ 400-
Portal vein thrombosisAbsentPresent-
GRETCH score[21]
Score
0123
Karnofsky index≥ 80%< 80%
Bilirubin (μmol ⁄ L)< 50≥ 50
Alkaline phosphatase< 2 X ULN≥ 2 X ULN
Alpha-fetoprotein (μg⁄L)< 35≥ 35
Portal vein thrombosisAbsentPresent
BCLC[16]
Stage
0 (very early)A (early)B (intermediate)C (advanced)D (end stage)
ECOG Performance Status0001-23-4
Liver functionChild-Pugh A-BChild-Pugh A-BChild-Pugh A-BChild-Pugh A-BChild-Pugh C
Tumor stageSingleSingle or 3 nodules < 3 cmMultinodularVascular invasion or extrahepatic spreadAny
CUPI[23]
VARIABLEWeight
TNM stageI and II-3
III-1
IV0
Total Bilirubin (μmol ⁄ L)< 340
34-513
≥ 524
Ascites3
Alpha-fetoprotein > 500 ng/mL2
Alkaline phosphatase > 200 IU/L3
Asymptomatic disease on presentation-4
JIS[24]
Score
0123
Child-Pugh scoreABC
TNM stage by LCSGJIIIIIIIV
Tokyo[22]
Score
012
Albumin (g/dL)> 3.52.8-3.5< 2.8
Bilirubin (mg/dL)< 11-2> 2
Tumor size (cm)< 22-5> 5
Numbers of nodules ≤ 3-> 3
AJCC/UICC TNM staging system 7th ed[12]
GroupDescriptionStage grouping
T1Single tumor without vascular invasionSTAGE IT1N0M0
T2Single tumor with vascular invasion or multiple tumors, none > 5 cmSTAGE IIT2N0M0
T3aMultiple tumors, any > 5 cmSTAGE IIIAT3aN0M0
T3bSingle tumor or multiple tumors of any size involving a major branch of portal or hepatic vein(s)STAGE IIIBT3bN0M0
T4Tumors with direct invasion of adjacent organs other than the gallbladder, or perforation of visceral peritoneumSTAGE IIICT4N0M0
N1Regional lymph node metastasisSTAGE IVAAny TN1M0
M1Distant metastasisSTAGE IVBAny TAny NM1
Table 2 Variables included in the main prognostic systems
VariablesPrognostic scores
Okuda[13]CLIP[14]GRETCH[21]BCLC[16]CUPI[23]JIS[24]Tokyo[22]
Child-Pugh scoreXXX
AscitesXX
AlbuminXX
Total BilirubinXXXX
Alkaline phosphataseXX
Alpha-fetoproteinXXX
Tumor sizeXXXX
Numbers of nodulesXXX
TNM stageXX
Portal vein thrombosisXXX
MetastasisX
Portal hypertensionX
Presence of symptoms and/or General StatusXXX
Table 3 Comparison of different hepatocellular carcinoma staging system in the literature
Ref.CountryYearCase numberPatient populationThe best
Levy et al[58]Canada2002257AllCLIP
Kudo et al[59]Japan20044525AllJIS
Cillo et al[41]Italy2004187AllBCLC
Grieco et al[39]Italy2005268Early to intermediateBCLC
Marrero et al[34]United States2005244AllBCLC
Nanashima et al[60]Japan2005210SurgeryCLIP
Huang et al[61]Taiwan2005599SurgeryTNM
Toyoda et al[62]Japan20051508AllJIS
Pascual et al[63]Spain2006115AllBCLC
Georgiades et al[42]United States2006172TACEChild-Pugh
Cillo et al[64]Italy2006195AllBCLC
Nanashima et al[65]Japan2006230SurgeryModified JIS
Kondo et al[66]Japan2007235SurgeryJIS
Seong et al[67]South Korea2007305RadiotherapyTNM
Chen et al[40]Taiwan2007382SurgeryCLIP
Huo et al[68]Taiwan2007430AllCLIP
Cammà et al[37]Italy2008406AllCLIP
Guglielmi et al[69]Italy2008112RFABCLC
Collette et al[70]French2008538AdvancedCLIP
Lu et al[71]China2008234SurgeryTNM
Chung et al[72]Japan2008290AllJIS
Lin et al[38]Taiwan20093668AllCLIP
Hsu et al[36]Taiwan20101713AllCLIP
Op den Winkel et al[73]German2012405Non-surgicalCLIP
Kim et al[35]South Korea20121717AllBCLC