Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2014; 20(10): 2681-2687
Published online Mar 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2681
Table 1 Number of patients with colon cancer classified according to endoscopic ultrasound vs surgical pathological T staging
EUS/HistologyT1T2T3T4Total
uT120002
uT203205
uT31111013
uT400011
Total3413121
Table 2 This table demonstrates the endoscopic ultrasound vs computed tomography staging of colon cancer in comparison with the surgical pathology classified into early (T1/T2) and advanced (T3/T4) stages
Pathological stageT1/T2T3/T4Total
EUS (n = 21)51217
CT (n = 19)4913
Table 3 Diagnostic values of endoscopic ultrasound vs computed tomography scan for staging of colon cancer
ModalitySensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAccuracy
EUS (n = 21 )85.0%-94.4%-80.9%
CT scan (n = 19)76.5%-86.7%-68.4%
Table 4 Advantages and disadvantages of the 3 types of echoendoscopes that have been used for the evaluation of lesions on the colon beyond the rectum
AdvantagesDisadvantages
A miniprobe echoendoscopeWidely available Can be used together with regular colonoscopeCannot be properly used for evaluation of thickened-wall colon cancer
A forward-viewing linear-array echoendoscopeAbility to perform EUS guided fine needle aspiration for colonic lesionsInconvenient to evaluate circumferential colonic lesions like colon cancer
A forward-viewing radial-array echoendoscopeAbility to evaluate circumferential colonic lesionsInability to perform EUS guided FNA for colonic lesions