Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Table 1 Characteristics of the included randomized controlled trials (according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias)
Ref. | Sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants | Incomplete outcome | Selective outcome | Other sources of bias |
Heo et al[22] 2007 | Computer random number generator | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Hong et al[11] 2009 | Unclear | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Kim et al[23] 2009 | The order of the procedure | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Kim et al[12] 2009 | Unclear | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Stefanidis et al[24] 2011 | Random number table | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Teoh et al[13] 2013 | Computer random number generator | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Table 2 Characteristics of the included randomized controlled trials
Ref. | Format | Country | Center involved | EST plus LBD, EST | Balloon diameter (mm) | Jadad score | |||
Number (n) | Male, female | Mean age (yr) | Stone size (mm) | ||||||
Heo et al[22] 2007 | Full text | Korea | 1 | 100 | 48, 52 | 64 | 16.0 ± 0.71 | 12-20 | 4 |
100 | 50, 50 | 63 | 15.0 ± 0.71 | ||||||
Hong et al[11] 2009 | Abstract | Korea | 1 | 70 | Not reported | Not reported | > 15 | 15 or 20 | 1 |
65 | > 15 | ||||||||
Kim et al[23] 2009 | Full text | Korea | 1 | 27 | 12, 15 | 70 | 15-38.3 | 15, 16.5 or 18 | 3 |
28 | 14, 14 | 70 | 15-48 | ||||||
Kim et al[12] 2009 | Abstract | Korea | 1 | 104 | 53, 51 | 70 | > 10 | 12-20 | 1 |
100 | 49, 51 | 69 | > 10 | ||||||
Stefanidis et al[24] 2011 | Full text | Greece | 1 | 45 | 24, 21 | 69 | 12-20 | 15, 18 or 20 | 4 |
45 | 22, 23 | 68 | 12-20 | ||||||
Teoh et al[13] 2013 | Full text | Hong Kong | 2 | 73 | 32, 41 | 72 | ≥ 13 | 13-15 | 4 |
78 | 40, 38 | 73 | ≥ 13 |
Table 3 Outcome data derived from the included randomized controlled trials n (%)
Ref. | Intervention | Complete stone removal | Stone removal inthe first session | Mechanical lithotripsy | Overall complications | Pancreatitis | Bleeding | Infection of biliary tract | Perforation |
Heo et al[22] 2007 | Small EST plus LBD | 97/100 (97) | 83/100 (83) | 8/100 (8) | 5/100 (5) | 4/100 (4) | 0/100 (0) | 1/100 (1) | 0/100 (0) |
Full EST | 98/100 (98) | 87/100 (87) | 9/100 (9) | 7/100 (7) | 4/100 (4) | 2/100 (2) | 1/100 (1) | 0/100 (0) | |
Hong et al[11] 2009 | Small EST plus LBD | 70/70 (100) | Not reported | 13/70 (19) | 8/70 (11) | 4/70 (6) | 4/70 (6) | 0/70 (0) | 0/70 (0) |
Conventional EST | 65/65 (100) | 47/65 (72) | 19/65 (29) | 9/65 (14) | 10/65 (15) | 0/65 (0) | 0/65 (0) | ||
Kim et al[23] 2009 | Small EST plus LBD | 27/27 (100) | 23/27 (85) | 9/27 (33) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) |
Conventional EST | 28/28 (100) | 23/28 (82) | 9/28 (32) | 0/28 (0) | 0/28 (0) | 0/28 (0) | 0/28 (0) | 0/28 (0) | |
Kim et al[12] 2009 | Small EST plus LBD | 100/104 (96) | 89/104 (86) | 8/104 (8) | 11/104 (11) | 10/104 (10) | 1/104 (1) | 0/104 (0) | 0/104 (0) |
Conventional EST | 92/100 (92) | 82/100 (82) | 17/100 (17) | 10/100 (10) | 9/100 (9) | 0/100 (0) | 0/100 (0) | 1/100 (1) | |
Stefanidis et al[24] 2011 | Full EST plus LBD | 44/45 (98) | Not reported | 0/45 (0) | 2/45 (4) | 1/45 (2) | 1/45 (2) | 0/45 (0) | 0/45 (0) |
Full EST plus ML | 41/45 (91) | 45/45 (100) | 9/45 (20) | 1/45 (2) | 1/45 (2) | 6/45 (13) | 1/45 (2) | ||
Teoh et al[13] 2013 | Small EST plus LBD | 71/73 (97) | 65/73 (89) | 21/73 (29) | 5/73 (7) | 2/73 (3) | 1/73 (1) | 2/73 (3) | 0/73 (0) |
Full EST | 78/78 (100) | 69/78 (88) | 36/78 (46) | 8/78 (10) | 3/78 (4) | 0/78 (0) | 3/78 (4) | 2/78 (3) |
Table 4 Analyses of procedure-related complications n (%)
Complications | All 6 studies | Four full-text studies (high-quality) | ||||||||
Incidence EST plus LBD, EST | OR/Peto OR (95%CI) | Pvalue | Heterogeneity | Incidence EST plus LBD, EST | OR/Peto OR (95%CI) | Pvalue | Heterogeneity | |||
I2 | Pvalue | I2 | Pvalue | |||||||
Overall | 31/419 (7.4) | 0.53 (0.33-0.85) | 0.008 | 28% | 0.24 | 12/245 (4.9) | 0.48 (0.24-0.99) | 0.05 | 0% | 0.37 |
53/416 (12.7) | 24/251 (9.6) | |||||||||
Pancreatitis | 21/419 (5.0) | 0.77 (0.43-1.39) | 0.39 | 0% | 0.74 | 7/245 (2.9) | 0.89 (0.32-2.49) | 0.83 | 0% | 0.95 |
26/416 (6.3) | 8/251 (3.2) | |||||||||
Bleeding | 7/419 (1.7) | 0.50 (0.20-1.23) | 0.13 | 22% | 0.27 | 2/245 (0.8) | 0.68 (0.12-3.93) | 0.66 | 31% | 0.24 |
13/416 (3.1) | 3/251 (1.2) | |||||||||
Infection of biliary tract | 3/419 (0.7) | 0.34 (0.11-1.02) | 0.05 | 28% | 0.25 | 3/245 (1.2) | 0.34 (0.11-1.02) | 0.05 | 28% | 0.25 |
10/416 (2.4) | 10/251 (4.0) | |||||||||
Perforation | 0/419 (0.0) | 0.14 (0.02-0.98) | 0.05 | 0% | 1.00 | 0/245 (0.0) | 0.14 (0.01-1.35) | 0.09 | 0% | 0.98 |
4/416 (1.0) | 3/251 (1.2) |
-
Citation: Yang XM, Hu B. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation
vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9453.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453