Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, Reyhan E, Değer C, Aziret M, Bozkurt H, Uzun S, Sözen S, İrkörücü O. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(47): 9057-9062 [PMID: 24379631 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Süleyman Çetinkünar, MD, Department of General Surgery, Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Yuregir, Adana 01240, Turkey. slmcetin@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2013; 19(47): 9057-9062 Published online Dec 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057
Table 1 Clinical approaches advised by the authors regarding the scoring systems
High probability
Probable/should be followed
Appendicitis with high probability
Alvarado
< 4
5-6
> 7
Eskelinen
< 48
48-57
> 57
Ohhmann
< 6
6-11.5
> 12
RIPASA
< 5
5-7
> 7.5
Table 2 Frequency of symptoms, examination findings and laboratory results n (%)
Group A
Group N-A
P value
Symptoms
Loss of appetite
Yes
25 (69)
66 (86)
0.072
No
11 (31)
11 (14)
Nausea-Vomiting
Yes
20 (56)
52(68)
0.294
No
16 (44)
25 (32)
Time pain started
< 48
21 (58)
59 (77)
0.074
> 48
15 (42)
18 (23)
Starting point of pain
Around stomach
8 (22)
37 (48)
0.021
Lower right quadrant
25 (69)
38 (49)
Anywhere
3 (8)
2 (3)
Relocalization of the pain to the lower right quadrant
Yes
7 (19)
33 (43)
0.020
No
29 (81)
44 (57)
Urinary system complaint
Yes
9 (25)
8 (10)
0.052
No
27 (75)
69 (90)
Similar pain history
Yes
19 (53)
13 (17)
< 0.001
No
17 (47)
64 (83)
Findings
Sensitivity on lower right quadrant
Yes
36 (100)
76 (99)
0.999
No
0 (0)
1 (1)
Defense-rigidity
Yes
23 (64)
77 (100)
< 0.001
No
13 (36)
0 (0)
Rebound
Yes
16 (44)
75 (97)
< 0.001
No
20 (56)
2 (3)
Rowsing finding
Yes
7 (19)
31 (40)
0.034
No
29 (81)
46 (60)
Fever
> 37.3
5 (14)
28 (36)
0.015
< 37.3
31 (86)
49 (64)
Laboratory results
Neutrophil
> %75
10 (28)
49 (64)
0.001
< %75
26 (72)
28 (36)
Leukocyte
< 10000
15 (42)
13 (17)
0.009
≥ 10000
21 (58)
64 (83)
Urine analysis
Normal
24 (67)
75 (97)
< 0.001
Abnormal
12 (33)
2 (3)
Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy values of the scoring systems
Alvarado (cut-off = 7)
Ohhmann (cut-off = 12)
Eskelinen (cut-off = 57)
RIPASA (cut-off = 7.5)
Sensitivity
82%
96%
100%
100%
Specificity
75%
42%
44%
28%
PPV
88%
78%
79%
75%
NPV
66%
83%
100%
100%
Diagnostic accuracy
80%
79%
82%
77%
Neg. app. rate
12%
22%
21%
25%
Table 4 Cut-off values for the maximum sensitivity and specificity values of the scoring systems
Measurements
AUC
Cut-off
Sensitivity
Specificity
Alvarado
0.818
6.50
81.8
75.0
Ohmann
0.899
13.75
83.1
80.6
Eskelinen
0.867
63.72
80.5
83.3
RİPASA
0.857
10.25
83.1
75.0
Citation: Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, Reyhan E, Değer C, Aziret M, Bozkurt H, Uzun S, Sözen S, İrkörücü O. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(47): 9057-9062