Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2013; 19(47): 9057-9062
Published online Dec 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057
Published online Dec 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057
Table 1 Clinical approaches advised by the authors regarding the scoring systems
High probability | Probable/should be followed | Appendicitis with high probability | |
Alvarado | < 4 | 5-6 | > 7 |
Eskelinen | < 48 | 48-57 | > 57 |
Ohhmann | < 6 | 6-11.5 | > 12 |
RIPASA | < 5 | 5-7 | > 7.5 |
Table 2 Frequency of symptoms, examination findings and laboratory results n (%)
Group A | Group N-A | P value | ||
Symptoms | ||||
Loss of appetite | Yes | 25 (69) | 66 (86) | 0.072 |
No | 11 (31) | 11 (14) | ||
Nausea-Vomiting | Yes | 20 (56) | 52(68) | 0.294 |
No | 16 (44) | 25 (32) | ||
Time pain started | < 48 | 21 (58) | 59 (77) | 0.074 |
> 48 | 15 (42) | 18 (23) | ||
Starting point of pain | Around stomach | 8 (22) | 37 (48) | 0.021 |
Lower right quadrant | 25 (69) | 38 (49) | ||
Anywhere | 3 (8) | 2 (3) | ||
Relocalization of the pain to the lower right quadrant | Yes | 7 (19) | 33 (43) | 0.020 |
No | 29 (81) | 44 (57) | ||
Urinary system complaint | Yes | 9 (25) | 8 (10) | 0.052 |
No | 27 (75) | 69 (90) | ||
Similar pain history | Yes | 19 (53) | 13 (17) | < 0.001 |
No | 17 (47) | 64 (83) | ||
Findings | ||||
Sensitivity on lower right quadrant | Yes | 36 (100) | 76 (99) | 0.999 |
No | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | ||
Defense-rigidity | Yes | 23 (64) | 77 (100) | < 0.001 |
No | 13 (36) | 0 (0) | ||
Rebound | Yes | 16 (44) | 75 (97) | < 0.001 |
No | 20 (56) | 2 (3) | ||
Rowsing finding | Yes | 7 (19) | 31 (40) | 0.034 |
No | 29 (81) | 46 (60) | ||
Fever | > 37.3 | 5 (14) | 28 (36) | 0.015 |
< 37.3 | 31 (86) | 49 (64) | ||
Laboratory results | ||||
Neutrophil | > %75 | 10 (28) | 49 (64) | 0.001 |
< %75 | 26 (72) | 28 (36) | ||
Leukocyte | < 10000 | 15 (42) | 13 (17) | 0.009 |
≥ 10000 | 21 (58) | 64 (83) | ||
Urine analysis | Normal | 24 (67) | 75 (97) | < 0.001 |
Abnormal | 12 (33) | 2 (3) |
Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy values of the scoring systems
Alvarado (cut-off = 7) | Ohhmann (cut-off = 12) | Eskelinen (cut-off = 57) | RIPASA (cut-off = 7.5) | |
Sensitivity | 82% | 96% | 100% | 100% |
Specificity | 75% | 42% | 44% | 28% |
PPV | 88% | 78% | 79% | 75% |
NPV | 66% | 83% | 100% | 100% |
Diagnostic accuracy | 80% | 79% | 82% | 77% |
Neg. app. rate | 12% | 22% | 21% | 25% |
Table 4 Cut-off values for the maximum sensitivity and specificity values of the scoring systems
Measurements | AUC | Cut-off | Sensitivity | Specificity |
Alvarado | 0.818 | 6.50 | 81.8 | 75.0 |
Ohmann | 0.899 | 13.75 | 83.1 | 80.6 |
Eskelinen | 0.867 | 63.72 | 80.5 | 83.3 |
RİPASA | 0.857 | 10.25 | 83.1 | 75.0 |
- Citation: Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, Reyhan E, Değer C, Aziret M, Bozkurt H, Uzun S, Sözen S, İrkörücü O. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(47): 9057-9062
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i47/9057.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057