Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Thomas D, Strosberg JR, Pape UF, Felder S, Tsolakis AV, Alexandraki KI, Fraenkel M, Saiegh L, Reissman P, Kaltsas G, Gross DJ. Metastatic type 1 gastric carcinoid: A real threat or just a myth? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(46): 8687-8695 [PMID: 24379587 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8687]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg, MD, Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Department of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel. simonag@hadassah.org.il
Research Domain of This Article
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2013; 19(46): 8687-8695 Published online Dec 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8687
Table 1 Clinical and histopathological characteristics of the study patients
Patient No.
No. of lesions
Size, largest lesion (mm)
Ki-67%
CT before Tx
SRS/68Ga before Tx
Distant mets
Gastrin (40-108 mU/L)
Surgery
Residual disease
SSA/monthly dosage (mg)
Outcome
F/U Period (mo)
at Dx
Last
1
multiple
15
2%
-
Uptake (stomach, LN)
no
1811
125
wedge resection
no
Som A 90
cure
108
2
solitary
35
2%
Liver mets
Uptake (stomach, Liver)
liver
-
-
Billroth 2 + LN
liver
no
SD
84
3
multiple
21
2%
Liver mets
Uptake (stomach, Liver)
liver
2204
325
none
liver
San LAR 30
CR
36
4
multiple
55
20%
Stomach lesion
Uptake (stomach)
diaphragm
1800
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
San LAR 30
cure
24
5
multiple
25
1%
Stomach lesion
Uptake (stomach, LN)
no
1403
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
no
cure
18
6
multiple
-
15%
Hepato-gastric ligament LN
no data
no
-
-
ER
no
no
cure
12
7
solitary
17
4%
LN
Uptake (stomach, LN)
no
700
600
wedge resection
no
no
cure
132
8
multiple
15
1%
Liver mets and LN
Uptake (LN, Liver)
liver
407
190
ER, largest
liver
San LAR 30 + INF 50 mcg/wk
PR
36
9
solitary
10
1%
Liver mets and LN
no data
liver
-
-
wedge resection
no
no
cure
360
10
solitary
30
5%
Stomach lesion
no uptake
no
5130
43
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
120
11
multiple
17
1%
-
no uptake
no
-
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
168
12
multiple
14
5%
-
no uptake
no
-
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
72
13
solitary
47
15%
-
Uptake (stomach, Liver)
liver
5470
45
ER
liver
none
SD
120
14
multiple
30
2%
-
Uptake (LN, Liver)
liver
1336
335
ER, recurrent
liver
none
SD
48
15
multiple
10
2%
No pathology
no uptake
no
3500
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
48
16
multiple
30
2%
Stomach lesion
no data
no
-
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
36
17
solitary
-
1%
Liver mets
Uptake (liver)
liver
1612
10
Billroth 2 + LN
liver
none
SD
36
18
multiple
20
-
Stomach lesion, mesenteric and gastro-hepatic LN
no data
no
506
-
wedge resection
no
none
cure
60
19
multiple
20
-
No pathology
no uptake
no
1600
-
Billroth 2 + LN
no
none
cure
72
20
multiple
15
-
Liver mets
Uptake (stomach, Liver)
liver
458
336
ER
liver
San LAR 30
SD
72
Table 2 Factors of significance in the suspicion of metastatic gastric carcinoid type 1 n (%)
Characteristics
All GCA1 patients (n = 254)
Metastatic GCA1 patients (n = 20)
P value at diagnosis (metastatic vs all GCA1)
Age (yr), mean ± SD
58.5 ± 12.7
55.1 ± 12.8
0.050
Size of largest tumor (mm, mean ± SD)
7.9 ± 12.1
20.14 ± 11
< 0.001
Ki-67 (%, mean ± SD)
1.9 ± 2.4
6.8 ± 11.2
< 0.001
Symptomatic
112 (44)
18 (90)
< 0.001
Gastrin levels (mI/L, mean ± SD) at diagnosis
898 ± 418
2138.4 ± 1562
< 0.001
Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study n (%)
Characteristics
All patients n = 20
Age (yr), mean ± SD
55.1 ± 12.8
Male:female, n
9:11
Caucasians
95%
Size of primary tumor (mm), mean ± SD
20.14 ± 11
Symptomatic
18 (90)
Atrophic gastritis
20 (100)
Other autoimmune diseases
2 (10)
Familial aggregation
3 (15)
Table 4 Features associated with the diagnosis of gastric carcinoid type 1 in our patients
Patient No.
Vitamin B12 levels (n. 180-670 pmol/L)
APCA
Gastrin levels (n. 40-108 mU/L)
Prior use of PPIs
1st gastroscopy (macroscopic)
Histo-pathology
H.Pylori
1
45
positive (1/20)
1811
no
multiple
CAG + IM
negative
2
165
positive
-
no
solitary
CAG + IM + NECH
-
3
333
positive (1:160)
2204
no
multiple
CAG + NECH
negative
4
186
positive (1:20)
1800
no
multiple
CAG + NECH
negative
5
104
positive (1:20)
1403
no
multiple
CAG + NECH
negative
6
122
positive (1:80)
-
no
multiple
CAG
-
7
121
-
700
no
solitary
CAG + IM + NECH
-
8
86
-
407
no
multiple
CAG + IM + NECH
-
9
50
-
-
no
solitary
CAG + NECH
-
10
-
positive (1:40)
5130
no
solitary
CAG
-
11
-
-
-
no
multiple
CAG
-
12
-
-
-
no
multiple
CAG
-
13
184
positive (1:160)
5470
no
solitary
CAG
-
14
121
positive
1336
no
multiple
CAG
-
15
215
-
3500
no
multiple
CAG
-
16
-
-
-
no
multiple
CAG + IM + NECH
-
17
345
-
1612
no
solitary
CAG
-
18
130
-
506
no
multiple
CAG
-
19
181
-
1600
no
multiple
CAG
negative
20
167
positive
458
no
multiple
CAG
-
Citation: Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Thomas D, Strosberg JR, Pape UF, Felder S, Tsolakis AV, Alexandraki KI, Fraenkel M, Saiegh L, Reissman P, Kaltsas G, Gross DJ. Metastatic type 1 gastric carcinoid: A real threat or just a myth? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(46): 8687-8695