Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2013; 19(45): 8420-8426
Published online Dec 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8420
Table 1 Characteristics of clinical studies of bile leakage test
StudyDesignComparisonMaterialSample (trial:control)Inclusion criteriaLiver diseaseCountry
Ijichi et al[11], (2000)RCTBL Test vs N-BL TestSaline solution51:51Liver resectionTumorJapan
Liu et al[13], (2012)RCTBL Test vs N-BL TestFat emulsion53:54Liver resectionTumor or hepatolithiasisChina
Li et al[12], (2009)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestFat emulsion57:70Major liver resectionTumorGermany
Suehiro et al[24], (2005)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestICG40:40Liver resectionLiver donorJapan
Lam et al[2], (2001)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestMethylene304:312Liver resectionTumorHong Kong
blue
Leelawat et al[26], (2012)Controlled clinical trialWhite Test vs Saline Solution TestFat emulsion30:30Liver resectionTumorThailand
Sakaguchi et al[27], (2010)Controlled clinical trialICGF Test vs N-ICGF TestICG27:32Liver resectionTumorJapan
Kaibori et al[25], (2011)RCTICGF Test vs N-ICGF TestICG52:50Liver resectionTumorJapan
Table 2 Quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials based on the Jadad scoring system
StudyRandomizedAppropriate randomizationAppropriately double blindedDescription of withdrawalsJadad scoreStudy quality
Ijichi et al[11], (2000)YesYesNoYes3High
Liu et al[13], (2012)YesYesNoYes3High
Kaibori et al[25], (2011)YesNoNoYes2Low
Table 3 Quality assessment of the included non-randomized controlled trials based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
StudySelection starComparability starOutcome starTotal starStudy quality
Li et al[12], (2009)4239High
Suehiro et al[24], (2005)3238High
Lam et al[2], (2001)3137High
Leelawat et al[26], (2012)4239High
Sakaguchi et al[27], (2010)3137High
Table 4 Intraoperative positive bile leakage and postoperative bile leakage treatment
StudyIntraoperative bile leakagePostoperative bile leakageConservative treatment (n)Puncture drainage (n)ENBD (n)Reoperation(n)
Ijichi et al[11], 200041.2% (21/51)5.9% (3/51)5000
Liu et al[13], 201262.3% (33/53)3.8% (2/53)7021
Li et al[12], 200971.4% (45/63)5.3% (3/57)No descriptionNo description12
Suehiro et al[24], 2005No description2.5% (1/40)No descriptionNo descriptionNo descriptionNo description
Lam et al[2], 200119.7% (60/304)3.6% (11/304)711610
Leelawat et al[26], 201263.3% (19/30)No description2000
Sakaguchi et al[27], 201029.6% (8/27)0% (0/27)2000
Kaibori et al[25], 201180.8% (42/52)0% (0/52)2120
Total39.3% (228/580)3.42% (20/584)25 (41.0%)12 (19.8%)11 (18.0%)13 (21.2%)