Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Table 1 Comparison of patient clinical characteristics between the 0.5-1.0 cm group and the > 1.0 cm group n (%)
Variable | 0.5-1.0 cm group (n = 158) | > 1.0 cm group (n = 123) | P value1 |
Age (yr) | 52 (24-88) | 51 (27-84) | 0.467 |
Gender | |||
Male/female | 109 (69.0)/49 (31.0) | 86 (69.9)/37 (30.1) | 0.873 |
Pre-existing hepatitis | |||
Hepatitis B | 125 (79.1) | 106 (86.2) | 0.133 |
Hepatitis C | 13 (8.2) | 5 (4.1) | 0.161 |
Hepatitis B and C | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.8) | 0.859 |
Child-Pugh grade | |||
Class A/class B | 78 (49.4)/80 (50.6) | 58 (47.2)/65 (52.8) | 0.754 |
Liver cirrhosis | |||
Yes/No | 55 (34.8)/103 (65.2) | 37 (30.1)/86 (69.9) | 0.417 |
Serum a-fetoprotein level (ng/mL) | |||
< 20 | 17 (10.8) | 11 (8.9) | 0.622 |
20-200 | 116 (73.4) | 93 (75.6) | 0.681 |
> 200 | 25 (15.8) | 19 (15.4) | 0.938 |
Tumor location | |||
S2,S3,S4,S6,S7/S5,S8 | 73 (46.2)/85 (53.8) | 56 (45.5)/67 (54.5) | 0.923 |
Biochemical analysis | |||
AST (IU/L) | 46.5 (11.3-235.2) | 46.1 (12.1-202.7) | 0.793 |
ALT (IU/L) | 48.4 (15.6-240.0) | 47.9 (13.8-212.4) | 0.560 |
Alb (g/dL) | 3.7 (2.9-4.2) | 3.6 (2.8-4.2) | 0.460 |
T-Bil (mg/dL) | 0.9 (0.7-1.4) | 0.9 (0.6-1.4) | 0.594 |
ALP (IU/L) | 83.5 (7.7-376.6) | 84.2 (8.1-284.8) | 0.744 |
PT (%) | 80.5 (58-100) | 83.0 (59-100) | 0.262 |
AFP (ng/mL) | 83.2 (6.3-1301.9) | 82.5 (5.4-750.7) | 0.849 |
Tumor diameter(cm) | 4.1 (3.1-5.0) | 4.1 (3.3-5.0) | 0.652 |
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm | |||
1 session/2 sessions | 115 (72.8)/43 (27.2) | 99 (80.5)/24 (19.5) | 0.143 |
Approaches of the first ablation session | 0.978 | ||
Percutaneous | 121 (76.6) | 94 (76.4) | |
Laparoscopic | 37 (23.4) | 29 (23.6) | |
Open | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Table 2 Comparison of the recurrence pattern between the 0.5-1.0 cm group and > 1.0 cm group n (%)
Recurrence pattern | 0.5-1.0 cm group (n = 158) | > 1.0 cm group (n = 123) | P value1 |
LTP only | 74 (46.8) | 39 (31.7) | 0.01 |
IDR only | 34 (21.5) | 22 (17.9) | 0.45 |
LTP + IDR | 38 (24.1) | 16 (13.0) | 0.02 |
Total LTP | 112 (70.9) | 55 (44.7) | < 0.001 |
Total IDR | 72 (45.6) | 38 (30.9) | 0.012 |
Table 3 Significant variables in the univariate analysis for local tumor progression, intrahepatic distant recurrence, and overall survival (n = 281)
Significant variable | n | P value1 | ||
LTP | IDR | OS | ||
Age (> 65 yr), yes/no | 123/158 | 0.376 | 0.282 | 0.103 |
Gender (male), yes/no | 195/76 | 0.571 | 0.436 | 0.854 |
Liver cirrhosis, yes/no | 92/189 | 0.469 | 0.645 | 0.912 |
Child–Pugh grade (Class B), yes/no | 145/136 | 0.173 | 0.742 | 0.811 |
Tumor location (S5,S8), yes/no | 152/129 | 0.537 | 0.488 | 0.635 |
Tumor size (4.1-5.0 cm), yes/no | 154/127 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.005 |
AM (> 1.0 cm), yes/no | 123/158 | 0.001 | 0.024 | 0.003 |
AST (> 40 IU/L), yes/no | 166/115 | 0.658 | 0.586 | 0.879 |
ALT (> 40 IU/L), yes/no | 157/124 | 0.672 | 0.460 | 0.734 |
ALP (> 110 IU/L), yes/no | 120/161 | 0.385 | 0.473 | 0.581 |
Alb (> 3.5 g/dL), yes/no | 202/79 | 0.622 | 0.564 | 0.838 |
T-Bil (> 1 mg/dL), yes/no | 93/188 | 0.541 | 0.502 | 0.796 |
PT (> 70%), yes/no | 216/65 | 0.336 | 0.573 | 0.636 |
AFP (> 200 ng/mL), yes/no | 44/237 | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.028 |
Post-RF ablation antiviral therapy, yes/no | 86/195 | 0.275 | 0.547 | 0.201 |
Body mass index (> 25 kg/m2), yes/no | 83/198 | 0.611 | 0.582 | 0.913 |
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm (2 sessions), yes/no | 67/214 | 0.034 | 0.041 | 0.031 |
Approaches of the first ablation session (Laparoscopic), yes/no | 66/215 | 0.459 | 0.383 | 0.728 |
Table 4 Significant variables in the multivariate analysis for local tumor progression, intrahepatic distant recurrence, and overall survival (n = 281)
Significant variable | LTP | IDR | OS | ||||||
HR | 95%CI | P value1 | HR | 95%CI | P value1 | HR ratio | 95%CI | P value1 | |
Tumor size (4.1-5.0 cm), yes/no | 1.032 | 0.521-1.376 | 0.475 | 0.891 | 0.452-1.602 | 0.744 | 0.882 | 0.673-1.572 | 0.084 |
AM (> 1.0 cm), yes/no | 1.484 | 0.101-1.812 | 0.001 | 1.278 | 1.137-1.729 | 0.025 | 1.604 | 0.881-2.753 | 0.002 |
AFP (> 200 ng/mL), yes/no | 0.947 | 0.540-1.050 | 0.531 | 0.509 | 0.370-1.215 | 0.546 | 1.007 | 0.639-1.158 | 0.748 |
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm (2 sessions), yes/no | 1.012 | 0.683-1.772 | 0.663 | 0.923 | 0.562-1.218 | 0.347 | 0.745 | 0.321-.431 | 0.325 |
- Citation: Ke S, Ding XM, Qian XJ, Zhou YM, Cao BX, Gao K, Sun WB. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: Is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i42/7389.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389