Ke S, Ding XM, Qian XJ, Zhou YM, Cao BX, Gao K, Sun WB. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: Is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398 [PMID: 24259969 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wen-Bing Sun, MD, PhD, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chao-yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing Gongren Tiyuchang Nan Road No. 8, Beijing 100043, China. cyhswb@qq.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Original Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm (2 sessions), yes/no
67/214
0.034
0.041
0.031
Approaches of the first ablation session (Laparoscopic), yes/no
66/215
0.459
0.383
0.728
Table 4 Significant variables in the multivariate analysis for local tumor progression, intrahepatic distant recurrence, and overall survival (n = 281)
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm (2 sessions), yes/no
1.012
0.683-1.772
0.663
0.923
0.562-1.218
0.347
0.745
0.321-.431
0.325
Citation: Ke S, Ding XM, Qian XJ, Zhou YM, Cao BX, Gao K, Sun WB. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: Is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398