Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2013; 19(37): 6144-6155
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144
Molecular targets | Therapeutic agents |
VEGF/VEGFR | Sorafenib |
Bevacizumab | |
Vatalanib (PTK787) | |
Cediranib (AZD2171) | |
Brivanib | |
Sunitinib | |
Linifanib (ABT869) | |
EGF/EGFR | Cetuximab |
Erlotinib | |
Lapatinib | |
IGF/IGFR | OSI-906 |
IMC-A12 | |
AVE1642 | |
BIIB022 | |
Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK | Sorafenib |
Selumetinib (AZD6244) | |
PI3K/Akt/mTOR | AZD8055 |
Everolimus | |
Sirolimus | |
Temsirolimus | |
Wnt-β-catenin | PFK118-310 |
PFK115-584 | |
CGP049090 | |
MET | Tivanitib |
Molecular targets/agents | Phase | Efficacy | Ref. |
VEGF/VEGFR | |||
Sorafenib | Phase III SHARP | Median OS: 10.7 mo vs 7.9 mo | [58] |
Sorafenib vs placebo | |||
Phase III (Asian) | Median OS:6.5 mo vs 4.2 mo | [59] | |
Sunitinib | Phase II | Median PFS: 3.9 mo | [65] |
Median OS: 9.8 mo | |||
Phase III | Median OS: 7.9 mo vs 10.2 mo | ||
Sunitinib vs sorafenib | |||
Brivanib | Phase II, first-line | Median PFS: 2.8 mo | [68] |
Median OS: 10 mo | |||
Phase II, second-line | Median PFS: 2.7 mo | [69] | |
Median OS: 9.8 mo | |||
Phase III (BRISK-PS) | Median OS: 9.4 mo vs 8.3 mo | [70] | |
Brivanib vs placebo | TTP: 4.2 mo vs 2.7 mo | ||
RR: 12% vs 2% | |||
Phase III (BRISK-FL) | Median OS: 9.5 mo vs 9.9 mo | [71] | |
Brivanib vs placebo | TTP: 4.2 mo vs 4.1 mo | ||
RR: 12% vs 8% | |||
Vatalanib (PTK787) | Phase I/II, combined with doxorubicin | OS: 7.3 mo | [73] |
PFS: 5. 4 mo | |||
Inifanib (ABT-869) | Phase II | TTP: 3.7 mo | [75] |
Median OS: 9.7 mo | |||
Cediranib (AZD2171) | Phase II | Median OS: 5.8 mo | [78] |
TTP: 2.8 mo | |||
EGF/EGFR | |||
Cetuximab | Phase II | Median OS: 9.6 mo | [81] |
Median PFS: 1.4 mo | |||
Erlotinib | Phase III (SEARCH) | Median OS: 9.5 mo vs 8.5 mo | [83] |
Sorafenib/erlotinib vs orafenib/placebo | TTP: 3.2 mo vs 4.0 mo | ||
Lapatinib | Phase II | Median PFS: 2.3 mo | [85] |
Median OS: 6.2 mo | |||
Phase III | Median OS: 9.1 mo vs 9.8 mo | ||
Lipatinib vs sorafenib | |||
IGF/IGFR | |||
Cituxumumab (IMC-A12) | Phase II | Median OS: 8 mo | [93] |
Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK | |||
Selumetinib (AZD6244) | Phase I/II | 11 patients enrolled | [31] |
PR in 3, SD in 6, PD in 2 patients | |||
PI3K/Akt/mTOR | |||
Everolimus | Phase I/II | Median PFS: 3.8 mo | [37] |
Median OS: 8.4 mo | |||
Sirolimus | Phase II | Median PFS: 15.3 wk | [38] |
Median OS: 26.4 wk | |||
MET | |||
Tivantinib | Randomized Phase II | [100] | |
Tivantinib vs placebo | |||
ITT population | Median TTP: 6.9 wk vs 6.0 wk | ||
Median OS: 6.6 mo vs 6.2 wk | |||
c-Met high | Median TTP: 11.7 wk vs 6.1 wk | ||
Median OS: 7.2 mo vs 3.8 wk |
- Citation: Shin JW, Chung YH. Molecular targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current and future. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(37): 6144-6155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i37/6144.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144