Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2013; 19(31): 5150-5158
Published online Aug 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5150
Table 1 Number of radical resection procedures and their relationship with tumor node metastasis stages
TNM stage procedure0IIIIIIAIIIBIVAIVBSum
C + N121137
C + WR + N2465219
C + S4aS5 + N89118
C + ELH + N11
C + ERH + N22
C + BD + N121
C + WR + BD + N13131110
C + S4As5 + BD + N13116
C + CH + BD + N11
C + S4aS5 + other + N3115
C + S4As5 + BD + other + N11
C + ERH + BD + other + N11
HPD + N246
Sum1681924101078
Table 2 Topographical distribution of 465 lymph nodes evaluated in 78 patients with gallbladder cancer n (%)
Node groupPatients with node groupLymph nodes evaluatedPatients with positivePositive nodes
evaluatednodes
Cystic duct141 (53.95)46 (9.89)18 (23.08)19 (19.39)
Pericholedochal168 (81.18)146 (31.40)20 (25.64)29 (29.59)
Periportal147 (60.26)74 (15.91)12 (15.38)18 (18.37)
Hepatic artery148 (61.54)69 (14.84)10 (12.82)12 (12.24)
Posterosuperior pancreaticoduodenal222 (28.21)56 (12.04)6 (7.69)12 (12.24)
Hilar118 (23.08)26 (5.59)4 (5.13)6 (6.12)
Right celiac28 (10.26)21 (4.52)1 (1.28)2 (2.04)
Perigastric24 (5.13)6 (1.29)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Superior mesenteric artery26 (7.69)11 (2.37)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Paraaortic26 (7.69)10 (2.15)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Sum78 (100)465 (100)37 (47.44)98 (100)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of clinical and histopathologic variables
VariableNumber of patientsSurvival rate
P value
3-yr5-yr
Age (yr)0.222
< 604134.15%17.07%
≥ 603724.32%18.92%
Sex0.523
Female4628.26%17.39%
Male3231.25%18.75%
Cholelithiasis0.374
Present2524.00%16.00%
Absent5332.08%18.87%
Type of radical resection0.179
Extended cholecystectomy742.86%42.86%
Partial hepatectomy13732.43%13.51%
Partial hepatectomy and EBD resection2330.43%26.09%
Extended hepatectomy25    0.00%      0.00%
Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy650.00%33.33%
Hepatic infiltration0.005
Present4114.63%      4.88%
Absent3751.35%37.84%
Bile duct infiltration0.238
Present1729.41%23.53%
Absent6132.79%19.67%
Venous invasion0.001
Present10    0.00%      0.00%
Absent6836.76%23.53%
Perineural invasion0.539
Present922.22%22.22%
Absent6933.33%20.29%
Lymph node involvement  < 0.001
Present3716.22%13.51%
Absent4146.34%26.83%
pT classification30.001
pT0-pT22060.00%45.00%
pT3-pT45822.41%12.07%
pN classification3  < 0.001
pN04146.34%26.83%
pN13116.13%12.90%
pN2616.67%16.67%
pM classification30.002
pM07433.78%21.62%
pM14    0.00%        0.00%
TNM staging3  < 0.001
0-II1580.00%60.00%
III4323.26%11.63%
IV2015.00%10.00%
TLNC0.018
< 42615.38%       7.69%
≥ 45240.38%26.92%
Number of positive lymph nodes  < 0.001
04146.34%26.83%
< 32416.67%16.67%
≥ 31315.38%    7.69%
LNR  < 0.001
04146.34%26.83%
< 501533.33%33.33%
≥ 5022    4.55%      0.00%
Histological type0.706
Adenocarcinoma6933.33%20.29%
Others922.22%22.22%
Histological grade0.042
G1-G25836.21%24.14%
G3-G41915.79%    5.26%
Table 4 Results of Cox multivariate regression analysis
VariableParameter estimateWaldχ2PHazard ratio95%CI
Tumor node metastasis staging20.559< 0.001
0-II1.000
III-3.11219.846< 0.0010.0450.011-0.175
IV-1.044 9.341  0.0020.3520.180-0.688
Lymph node ratio  2.42420.247< 0.001  11.2933.929-32.465
Total lymph node count-0.14714.273< 0.0010.8640.800-0.932
Histological grade-0.755 5.512  0.0190.4700.250-0.883