Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2013; 19(26): 4177-4184
Published online Jul 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4177
Published online Jul 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4177
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population n (%)
CSP (n = 80) | NDP (n = 80) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 59.1 ± 11.4 | 59.4 ± 11.7 | 0.847 |
20 ≤ age < 40 | 3 (3.8) | 5 (6.2) | |
40 ≤ age < 60 | 38 (47.5) | 43 (53.8) | |
age ≥ 60 | 39 (48.7) | 32 (40) | |
Gender | 0.210 | ||
Male | 41 (51.3) | 45 (56.3) | |
Female | 39 (48.7) | 35 (43.7) | |
Marital status | > 0.999 | ||
Married | 75 (93.8) | 76 (96.0) | |
Single or divorced | 5 (6.2) | 4 (4.0) | |
Education | 0.320 | ||
Middle school | 20 (25.0) | 13 (16.2) | |
High school | 31 (38.8) | 28 (35.0) | |
University | 22 (27.5) | 32 (40.0) | |
Graduate school | 7 (8.7) | 7 (8.8) | |
Residence | 0.609 | ||
Urban | 73 (91.3) | 70 (87.5) | |
Rural | 7 (8.7) | 10 (12.5) | |
ASA status | 0.896 | ||
Class I | 32 (40) | 36 (45.0) | |
Class II | 48 (60) | 44 (55.0) | |
Class III | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Class IV | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Class V | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Table 2 Endoscopic characteristics of study population n (%)
CSP (n = 80) | NDP (n = 80) | P value | |
Indication of colonoscopy | 0.260 | ||
Abnormality on other study | 2 (2.5) | 4 (5.0) | |
Stool occult blood positive | 9 (11.2) | 13 (16.2) | |
Screening | 47 (58.8) | 42 (52.5) | |
Anemia | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1.2) | |
Diarrhea | 3(3.8) | 4 (5.0) | |
Surveillance after polyp removal | 6 (7.5) | 11 (13.8) | |
Abdominal pain | 13 (16.2) | 5 (6.3) | |
Ottawa Quality Scale | 3.9 ± 2.5 | 4.3 ± 2.8 | 0.382 |
Procedural time (min) | |||
Insertion | 10.7 ± 8.5 | 8.6 ± 5.5 | 0.059 |
Withdrawal | 12.8 ± 6.2 | 11.8 ± 5.5 | 0.309 |
Number of polyp | 1.1 ± 1.8 | 0.8 ± 1.5 | 0.266 |
Number of examinees with polyps | 47 (58.8) | 42 (52.5) | 0.525 |
Method of polyp removal | 0.521 | ||
Biopsy | 25 (52.1) | 22 (56.4) | |
Snaring polypectomy | 15 (31.3) | 8 (20.5) | |
Endoscopic mucosal resection | 8 (16.6) | 9 (23.1) | |
Adverse events | |||
Bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Perforation | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Cecal approach | 80 (100) | 80 (100) | - |
Pain scale1 | 3.5 ± 2.7 | 3.7 ± 2.4 | 0.719 |
Genders between examinee and endoscopist | 0.525 | ||
Same gender | 42 (52.5) | 47 (58.8) | |
Different gender | 38 (47.5) | 33 (41.2) |
Table 3 Comparison of satisfaction rated by Group Health Association of America 9 survey by favorable response rate and likert scale, pants specific satisfaction, state anxiety and shame after colonoscopy between novel double pants and conventional single pants
FRR, n (%) | Likert scale (mean ± SD) | |||||
CSP | NDP | P value | CSP | NDP | P value | |
GHAA9 | ||||||
Appointment wait time | 73 (91.3) | 72 (90.0) | > 0.999 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 0.351 |
Waiting on procedure day | 74 (92.5) | 76 (95.0) | 0.746 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 0.649 |
Personal manner of physician | 78 (97.5) | 79 (98.8) | > 0.999 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 0.712 |
Technical skills of physician | 74 (92.5) | 76 (95.0) | 0.746 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 0.564 |
Personal manner of support staff | 77 (96.3) | 78 (97.5) | > 0.999 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 0.546 |
Adequacy of explanation of what was done | 74 (92.5) | 78 (97.5) | 0.276 | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 0.902 |
Overall rating of visit | 75 (93.8) | 74 (92.5) | > 0.999 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 0.806 |
Yes/No questions | ||||||
Would have procedure by same physician: Yes | 78 (97.5) | 77 (96.3) | > 0.999 | |||
Would have procedure at same facility: Yes | 79 (98.8) | 79 (98.8) | > 0.999 | |||
Pants specific satisfaction | ||||||
Difficulty in defecation | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.106 | |||
Difficulty in position change | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 0.175 | |||
Worriness about exposing buttock area in procedure | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 2.9 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 | |||
Will to wear same pants at next colonoscopy | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | < 0.001 | |||
Will to recommend to other people to wear same pants | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 | |||
Before colonoscopy | ||||||
Total scores of trait anxiety | 39.2 ± 8.8 | 39.4 ± 8.2 | 0.904 | |||
Total scores of state anxiety | 37.9 ± 8.2 | 39.9 ± 8.8 | 0.144 | |||
After colonoscopy | ||||||
Total scores of state anxiety | 35.4 ± 6.9 | 33.0 ± 7.0 | 0.028 | |||
Total scores of shame | 8.1 ± 3.2 | 6.6 ± 1.5 | < 0.001 | |||
Change of state anxiety before and after the procedure | -2.4 ± 7.6 | -6.9 ± 8.4 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of pants specific satisfaction after colonoscopy
Predictive factors | Outcome (pants specific satisfaction) | Outcome (state anxiety after colonoscopy) | Outcome (shame after colonoscopy) | |||||||||
Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | B (SE) | P value | |
Sex | ||||||||||||
Male | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||
Female | 0.04 (0.36) | 0.913 | 4.29 (1.06) | 0.913 | 3.52 (1.14) | 0.002 | 1.31 (0.40) | 0.001 | 1.25 (0.37) | 0.001 | ||
Age | -0.02 (0.01) | 0.104 | 0.01 (0.04) | 0.104 | -0.01 (0.01) | 0.928 | ||||||
Marital status | ||||||||||||
Married | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||
Unmarried | -1.6 (0.7) | 0.033 | -1.82 (0.61) | 0.004 | 4.48 (2.40) | 0.033 | 4.45 (2.22) | 0.047 | 2.79 (0.87) | 0.002 | 2.78 (0.81) | 0.001 |
Education | ||||||||||||
Middle school | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||||
High school | -0.04 (0.49) | 0.931 | -1.81 (1.53) | 0.931 | -0.01 (0.57) | 0.998 | ||||||
University | 0.27 (0.50) | 0.506 | -2.64 (1.55) | 0.506 | 0.22 (0.58) | 0.697 | ||||||
Graduate school | 0.57 (0.73) | 0.430 | -2.50 (2.24) | 0.430 | 0.15 (0.84) | 0.853 | ||||||
Type of pants | ||||||||||||
CSP | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||
NDP | 2.70 (0.29) | < 0.001 | 2.72 (0.28) | < 0.001 | -2.43 (1.10) | < 0.001 | -1.80 (1.04) | 0.086 | -1.47 (0.39) | < 0.001 | -1.37 (0.37) | 0.001 |
Residence | ||||||||||||
Rural area | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
Urban area | -0.46 (0.58) | 0.430 | 4.2 (1.7) | 0.430 | 4.68 (1.70) | 0.007 | 0.93 (0.67) | 0.165 | ||||
Genders between examinee and endoscopist | ||||||||||||
Same gender | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||
Different gender | -0.36 (0.36) | 0.308 | 3.90 (1.07) | < 0.001 | 1.45 (1.15) | 0.209 | 0.65 (0.41) | 0.115 |
- Citation: Chung SH, Park SJ, Hong JS, Hwang JY, Lee SA, Kim KR, Lee HS, Hong SP, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim WH. Comparison of double pants with single pants on satisfaction with colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(26): 4177-4184
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i26/4177.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4177