Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2013; 19(21): 3263-3271
Published online Jun 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i21.3263
Published online Jun 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i21.3263
Table 1 Demographic and histopathological data of 21 patients assessed for both stage and size before chemotherapy
Age, median (IQ range) | 60 (60-66) |
Gender (male/female) | 17/4 |
Surgery (AR/APR/Hartman) | 13/8/0 |
Laparoscopy (yes/no) | 10/11 |
Differentiation grade (G1/2/3/4) | 0/19/0/0 (2 not classified) |
T-stage (T1/2/3/4) | 2/8/9/2 |
N-stage (N0/1/2) | 12/6/3 |
Assessed nodes, median (IQ range) | 15 (14-18) |
Table 2 Feasibility and accuracy of the tumour node metastasis staging, with stage II as the cut-off, using magnetic resonance imaging, endosonography and a combination (combo) of assessments of lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging and assessments of perirectal tissue penetration using endosonography compared with the histopathology of resected specimens in 23 patients before and after chemotherapy
MRI-pre | ERUS-pre | Combo-pre | MRI-post | ERUS-post | Combo-post | |
Feasibility of stage | 1.00 | 0.81 | ||||
Feasibility of size | 0.97 | 0.74 | ||||
Accuracy of differentiating stages I/II | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
Sensitivity of differentiating stages I/II | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.93 |
Specificity of differentiating stages I/II | 0.5 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.62 |
Kappa value of differentiating stages I/II | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.58 |
Overstaging of differentiating stages I/II | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.087 | 0.13 |
Understaging of differentiating stages I/II | 0.17 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.048 |
Accuracy of perirectal penetration | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.78 | ||
Accuracy of lymph node detection | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
Table 3 Tumour length (median and range in mm) and the area (median and range in mm) using magnetic resonance imaging and endosonography before and after chemotherapy in 18 patients
Modality | Before chemotherapy | After chemotherapy | Specimen | ||
Length | Area | Length | Area | Length | |
MRI | 47 (36-68) | 641 (283-1345) | 44 (19-68) | 616 (156-1431) | Not applicable |
ERUS | 46 (29-59) | 680 (290-2110) | 41 (15-56) | 595 (100-1380) | Not applicable |
Histopathology | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 34 (12-70) |
- Citation: Swartling T, Kälebo P, Derwinger K, Gustavsson B, Kurlberg G. Stage and size using magnetic resonance imaging and endosonography in neoadjuvantly-treated rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(21): 3263-3271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i21/3263.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i21.3263