Ren G, Cai R, Zhang WJ, Ou JM, Jin YN, Li WH. Prediction of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(20): 3096-3107 [PMID: 23716990 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3096]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Wen-Hua Li, Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai 200092, China. liwhxh120819@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Number of retrieved lymph nodes and lymph node metastasis ratios for involved lymph nodes at each nodal station in early gastric cancer
Node group
No. of dissected nodes
No. of metastasis nodes
Incidence of lymphnode metastasis (%)
No. 1
165
1
0.6
No. 2
27
3
11.1
No. 3
861
41
4.8
No. 4
670
23
3.4
No. 5
78
2
2.6
No. 6
358
21
5.9
No. 7
263
4
1.5
No. 8
120
3
2.5
No. 9
134
3
2.2
No. 10
16
0
0.0
No. 11
27
1
3.7
No. 12
108
0
0.0
No. 13
58
0
0.0
No. 14
23
8
34.8
No. 15
13
0
0.0
No. 16
5
0
0.0
Total
2926
110
3.8
Table 5 Lymph node metastasis ratios and incidence at each station in upper third, middle third and lower third gastric cancers
Node group
Upper
Middle
Lower
pN category
Incidence
Ratio
pN category
Incidence
Ratio
pN category
Incidence
Ratio
No. 1
pN1
0.0 (0/52)
0.0 (0/25)
pN1
7.4 (1/73)
1.0 (1/98)
pN2
0.0 (0/40)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 2
pN1
5.3 (1/19)
4.0 (1/25)
pN3
28.6 (2/7)
1.0 (1/98)
M
0.0 (0/1)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 3
pN1
5.5 (7/128)
8.0 (2/25)
pN1
3.8 (17/445)
9.2 (9/98)
pN1
5.9 (17/288)
8.9 (7/79)
No. 4
pN1
1.6 (1/62)
4.0 (1/25)
pN1
4.3 (15/347)
5.1 (5/98)
pN1
2.7 (7/261)
6.3 (5/79)
No. 5
pN3
0.0 (0/6)
0.0 (0/25)
pN1
2.6 (1/38)
1.0 (1/98)
pN1
2.9 (1/34)
1.3 (1/79)
No. 6
pN3
0.0 (0/21)
0.0 (0/25)
pN1
2.2 (4/182)
2.0 (2/98)
pN1
11.0 (17/155)
8.9 (7/79)
No. 7
pN2
0.0 (0/21)
0.0 (0/25)
pN2
0.0 (0/141)
0.0 (0/98)
pN2
4.0 (4/101)
1.3 (1/79)
No. 8
pN2
16.7 (2/12)
4.0 (1/25)
pN2
1.6 (1/63)
1.0 (1/98)
pN2
0.0 (4/45)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 9
pN2
0.0 (0/5)
0.0 (0/25)
pN2
3.5 (3/85)
3.1 (3/98)
pN2
0.0 (4/44)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 10
pN2
0.0 (0/2)
0.0 (0/25)
pN3
0.0 (0/3)
0.0 (0/98)
M
0.0 (0/11)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 11
pN2
0.0 (0/4)
0.0 (0/25)
pN2
7.1 (1/14)
1.0 (1/98)
pN2
0.0 (0/9)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 12
pN3
0.0 (0/6)
0.0 (0/25)
pN2
0.0 (0/61)
0.0 (0/98)
pN2
0.0 (0/41)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 13
M
0.0 (0/10)
0.0 (0/25)
pN3
0.0 (0/31)
0.0 (0/98)
pN3
0.0 (0/17)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 14
M
0.0 (0/2)
0.0 (0/25)
pN3
41.2 (7/17)
1.0 (1/98)
pN2
25.0 (1/4)
1.3 (1/79)
No. 15
M
0.0 (0/1)
0.0 (0/25)
M
0.0 (0/9)
0.0 (0/98)
M
0.0 (0/3)
0.0 (0/79)
No. 16
M
0.0 (0/0)
0.0 (0/25)
pN3
0.0 (0/5)
0.0 (0/98)
pN3
0.0 (0/0)
0.0 (0/79)
Table 6 Correlation between lymph node metastases at pN1 and pN2 and clinicopathological factors
pN1
pN2
-
+
P
-
+
P
Tumor size (cm)
0.24
0.295
≤ 2.0
86 (88.7)
11 (11.3)
95 (97.9)
2 (2.1)
> 2.0
87 (82.9)
18 (17.1)
100 (95.2)
5 (4.8)
Macroscopic type
0.969
0.259
Elevated
21 (84.0)
4 (16.0)
24 (96.0)
1 (4.0)
Flat
18 (85.7)
3 (14.3)
19 (90.5)
2 (9.5)
Depressed
134 (85.9)
22 (14.1)
152 (97.4)
4 (2.6)
Invasion depth
0.008
0.334
Mucosal
111 (91.0)
11 (9.0)
119 (97.5)
3 (2.5)
Submucosal
62 (77.5)
18 (22.5)
76 (95.0)
4 (5.0)
Differentiate
0.332
0.349
Differentiated
106 (87.6)
15 (12.4)
118 (97.5)
3 (2.5)
Undifferentiated
67 (82.7)
14 (17.3)
77 (95.1)
4 (4.9)
Lymphovascular invasion
0.126
0.804
No
174 (87.0)
26 (13.0)
194 (97.0)
6 (3.0)
Yes
1 (50.0)
1 (50.0)
2 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
Citation: Ren G, Cai R, Zhang WJ, Ou JM, Jin YN, Li WH. Prediction of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(20): 3096-3107