Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2013; 19(1): 72-77
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.72
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
Group AGroup BGroup CP value
Number of patients2554107
Age (yr)0.08
Median646668
Range47-8135-8424-89
Gender0.20
Male11 (44)28 (52)66 (62)
Female14 (56)26 (48)41 (38)
ECOG performance score0.12
010 (40)13 (24)46 (43)
112 (48)37 (69)50 (47)
2-33 (12)4 (7)11 (10)
Primary biliary site0.47
Gallbladder14 (56)22 (41)46 (43)
Intra-hepatic bile duct5 (20)21 (39)40 (37)
Extra-hepatic bile duct6 (24)9 (16)20 (19)
Ampulla of Vater0 (0)2 (4)1 (1)
Disease status0.76
Locally advanced6 (24)15 (28)24 (22)
Metastatic19 (76)39 (72)83 (78)
Table 2 Regimens for first-line and second-line treatment
First-line treatment
Group A (n = 25)
5-fluorouracil + radiation5
5-fluorouracil ia + radiation2
5-fluorouracil + cisplatin + radiation1
5-fluorouracil ia1
5-fluorouracil + doxorubicin + mitomycin C ia1
5-fluorouracil + cisplatin3
5-fluorouracil + doxorubicin + mitomycin C1
Uracil-tegafur2
Gemcitabine9
Group B (n = 54)
5-fluorouracil + radiation2
5-fluorouracil ia + radiation2
Uracil-tegafur + radiation1
5-fluorouracil1
5-fluorouracil + doxorubicin + mitomycin C2
Gemcitabine25
S-120
Gemcitabine + cisplatin1
Group C (n = 107)
Gemcitabine + S-162
Gemcitabine44
S-11
Second-line treatment
Group A (n = 6)
Gemcitabine2
Gemcitabine ia1
5-fluorouracil + radiation1
S-11
Uracil-tegafur1
Group B (n = 27)
Gemcitabine14
S-19
S-1 + interferon-α1
5-fluorouracil2
Mitomycin C1
Group C (n = 51)
Gemcitabine + cisplatin28
Gemcitabine6
S-113
Cisplatin ia1
5-fluorouracil + interferon-α1
Irinotecan1
Uracil-tegafur1