Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2012; 18(46): 6829-6835
Published online Dec 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6829
Published online Dec 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6829
Study | n | Median delay to drainage, d (range) | Median procedures per patient (range) | Success (%) | Median follow-up, mo (range) | Complications (%) | Overall mortality(%) |
Percutaneous drainage | |||||||
Freeny et al[8] | 34 | 9 d (1-48 d) | 4 (1-12) | 16 (47) | NA | 24 (71) | 4 (12) |
Van Santvoort et al[11] | 43 | NA | 1-2 | 15 (35) | 6 | 17 (40) | 8 (19) |
Rocha et al[12] | 28 | NA | NA | 5 (18) | NA | 3 (11) | 8 (29) |
Mortelé et al[13] | 35 | 11 d (2-33 d) | 3 (1-7) | 17 (49) | NA | 4 (11) | 6 (17) |
Bruennler et al[14] | 80 | 3.5 d (1-40 d) | 2 (1-9) | 42 (53) | NA | 23 (29) | 27 (34) |
Lee et al[15] | 18 | NA | NA | 14 (78) | 7.3 | 2 (11) | 1 (6) |
Baril et al[16] | 38 | NA | 2.4 (2-4) | 30 (79) | NA | 1 (3) | 2 (5) |
Gambiez et al[17] | 10 | 17 d (10-25 d) | NA | 3 (30) | NA | 6 (60) | 2 (20) |
Endoscopic necrosectomy | |||||||
Seifert et al[18] | 93 | 41 d (4-158 d) | 6.2 (1-35) | 63 (68) | 43 | 24 (26) | 13 (19) |
Coelho et al[19] | 56 | 5 wk (4-10 wk) | 4 (2-8) | 49 (87) | 21 | 11 (20) | 2 (3.5) |
Escourrou et al[20] | 13 | 27.5 d (23-32 d) | 1.8 (1-3) | 13 (100) | 19.5 | 6 (46) | 0 (0) |
Lopes et al[21] | 26 | NA | NA | 24 (94) | 9 | 2 (7.7) | 0 (0) |
Voermans et al[22] | 25 | 84 d (21-385 d) | NA | 23 (95) | 16 | 10 (40) | 0 (0) |
Papachristou et al[23] | 53 | 49 d (20-300 d) | 3 (1-12) | 41 (77) | 5.7 | 26 (49) | 3 (6) |
Hookey et al[24] | 17 | 23 d (10-45 d) | 2 (1-2) | 10 (59) | NA | 2 (12) | NA |
Charnley et al[25] | 13 | 24 d (3-180 d) | 4 (1-10) | 11 (85) | 16 | 0 (0) | 2 (15) |
Seewald et al[26] | 13 | NA | NA | 9 (69) | 8.3 | 3 (5.6) | 0 (0) |
Baron et al[27] | 43 | NA | 2 (1-6) | 31 (72) | 25 | 16 (37) | NA |
Laparoscopic necrosectomy | |||||||
Parekh[28] | 19 | 65 d (22-154 d) | 1 (1-3) | 14 (74) | NA | 11 (58) | 2 (10.5) |
Zhu et al[29] | 10 | 1-3 wk (NA) | NA | 9 (90) | NA | NA | 1 (10) |
Retroperitoneal necrosectomy | |||||||
Gambiez et al[17] | 20 | 18 d (NA) | 5 (1-9) | 17 (85) | NA | 6 (30) | 2 (10) |
Raraty et al[30] | 137 | 32 d (1-181 d) | 3 (1-9) | 120 (86) | NA | 75 (55) | 26 (19) |
Chang et al[31] | 19 | 35 d (14-56 d) | NA | 17 (89.5) | NA | 4 (21) | 3 (15.8) |
Castellanos et al[32] | 11 | 13 d (1-28 d) | 5 (3-10) | 11 (100) | 2-60 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Carter et al[33] | 10 | 24 d (13-187 d) | 3 (1-6) | 8 (80) | NA | 5 (50) | 2 (20) |
Combined approach | |||||||
Van Sanvoort et al[11] | 43 | 4 wk | 1-7 | 41 (95) | 3-6 | 17 (40) | 8 (19) |
Horvath et al[34] | 40 | 4 wk | 1 (1-2) | 24 (60) | 6 | 29 (72.5) | 2 (5) |
- Citation: Bello B, Matthews JB. Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(46): 6829-6835
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i46/6829.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6829