Review
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2012; 18(45): 6552-6559
Published online Dec 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6552
Table 1 Overview of fructose-related human studies
AuthorsSubjectsStudy characteristicsSugarMain results
Browning et al[11]18 NAFLD (5 men, 13 women), BMI: 35 ± 7 kg/m2Intervention study 2 wk dietary carbohydrate and calorie restrictionReductions in body weight (-4.6 ± 1.5 kg vs -4.0 ± 1.5 kg) and hepatic triglycerides (-55% ± 14% vs -28% ± 23%) were significantly greater with dietary carbohydrate restriction than with calorie restriction
Maersk et al[12]60 overweight/obese nondiabetic subjectsRandomized intervention study Ingestion of 4 different drinks (1 L/d, SSB, isocaloric semiskim milk, aspartame-sweetened and water) for 6 moSDaily intake of SSB with sucrose increased ectopic fat accumulation (liver, skeletal muscle) and lipids (blood cholesterol and triglycerides) compared with the other beverages
Silbernagel et al[13]Healthy male (12) and female (8) adultsDietary intervention study 150 g/d for 4 wkF and GVisceral and liver fat content associated to cholesterol synthesis Cholesterol synthesis appeared to be dependent on fructose/glucose intake
Stanhope et al[14]48 adults, BMI 18-35 kg/m2Dietary intervention study Consumption of simple sugars at 25% of energy requirements for 2 wkF and GF consumption increased cardiovascular risk factors (AUC-Tg, fasting LDL and apo B) more than G
de Koning et al[15]40 389 healthy menProspective cohort study 20 yr of follow-up of SSB and artificially sweetened beverages consumptionF, G and S SSBAfter adjustment for several confounders, the hazard ratio for the association of SSB with incident type 2 diabetes was 1.24 for the comparison of the top with the bottom quartile of SSB intake
Silbernagel et al[16]Healthy male (12) and female (8) adultsDietary intervention study 150 g/d for 4 wkF and GInsulin sensitivity decreased in both intervention groups, while plasma triglycerides were increased in the F group
Cox et al[17]Overweight/obese male (16) and female (15) adultsIntervention study 10 wk supplementation with SSB at 25% of energy requirementsF and G SSBF-consuming subjects had a significant reduction in net postprandial fat oxidation and resting energy expenditure
Maier et al[18]15 overweight/obese children (5-8 yr)Dietary intervention study parental training to reduce dietary sugar content (–50% from baseline, 12 wk) and 12 wk of follow-upF, G and SReductions in sugar intake were related to significant reductions in BMI and BMI standard deviation scores
Pollock et al[19]559 adolescents (14-18 yr)Association study of F intake and cardiometabolic risk factorsFAfter adjustment, higher F consumption directly associated to BP, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR and C-reactive protein, and inversely to HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin. The introduction of visceral fat as a covariate attenuated these trends
Cox et al[21]Overweight/obese male (16) and female (15) adultsIntervention study 10 wk supplementation with SSB at 25% of energy requirementsF and G SSBFasting concentrations of MCP-1, PAI-1 and E-selectin as well as postprandial concentrations of PAI-1 increased in subjects consuming F but not in those consuming G
Brown et al[22]2696 peopleCross-sectional association studyF, G and S SSBDirect and independent associations of SSB intake and BP
Greater sugar-BP differences for persons with higher sodium excretion
Friberg et al[25]61 226 womenPopulation-based cohort study 18.4 yr of follow-up of total sucrose, high-sugar-foodsF, G and STotal sucrose intake and consumption of sweet buns and cookies was associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer
Ye et al[26]737 non diabetic adultsAssociation study of sugar intake and cognitive functionF, G and SGreater intakes of total sugars, added sugars and SSB beverages, but not of sugar sweetened solid foods, were significantly associated with lower MMSE scores, after adjusting for covariates