Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2012; 18(41): 5870-5878
Published online Nov 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5870
Published online Nov 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5870
Table 1 Patient characteristics (140 patients, 148 nodules)
Characteristics | Value |
Male/female (n/n) | 94/46 |
Age (yr) | 73.0 ± 11.1 |
ICGR 15 (%) | 22.6 ± 14.4 |
Maximum tumor diameters (mm) | 21.9 ± 7.1 |
Hepatocellular carcinomas | 132 |
Metastatic liver cancers | 14 |
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas | 2 |
Tumor locations | |
Segment 1 | 3 |
Segment 2 | 11 |
Segment 3 | 23 |
Segment 4 | 13 |
Segment 5 | 20 |
Segment 6 | 22 |
Segment 7 | 23 |
Segment 8 | 33 |
RFA needle lengths (2 cm/3 cm) | 79/69 |
Ablation time (s) | 862 ± 613 |
Table 2 Tumor characteristics for each impedance type (148 nodules)
Impedance subtype | Maximum tumor diameter (mm)1 | ICGR 15 (%)1 | Tumor location(segments 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)2 |
A | 20.3± 6.0 | 17.8 ± 13.9 | (0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1) |
B | 20.4 ± 5.3 | 29.8 ± 10.7a | (1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1) |
C | 21.2 ± 8.1 | 19.9 ± 11.1 | (0,3,3,3,5,3,3,6) |
D | 22.7 ± 6.7 | 24.2 ± 17.9 | (0,2,8,4,8,6,4,11) |
E | 22.7 ± 6.3 | 21.4 ± 10.2 | (1,2,1,2,1,3,8,5) |
F | 22.3 ± 7.8 | 24.1 ± 15.9 | (1,1,4,1,3,5,3,3) |
G | 20.9 ± 8.1 | 20.2 ± 14.0 | (0,1,5,2,2,4,4,6) |
- Citation: Iida H, Aihara T, Ikuta S, Yamanaka N. Effectiveness of impedance monitoring during radiofrequency ablation for predicting popping. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(41): 5870-5878
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i41/5870.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5870