Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2012; 18(37): 5289-5294
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5289
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the mini-laparotomy and traditional laparotomy groups
Minilaparotomy (n = 410)Traditional laparotomy (n = 1005)P value
Gender0.125
Male273 (66.6)635 (63.2)
Female137 (33.4)370 (36.8)
Age (yr)61.2 ± 12.157.8 ± 12.40.385
BMI (kg/m2)21.3 ± 3.022.0 ± 2.90.331
Distance to dentate line (cm)8.2 ± 3.27.2 ± 4.00.118
Table 2 Surgical and pathological findings for the mini-laparotomy and traditional laparotomy groups
MinilaparotomyTraditional laparotomyP value
TNM stage0.838
Stage I47 (11.5)119 (11.8)
Stage II127 (31.0)320 (31.8)
Stage III151 (36.8)379 (37.7)
Stage IV85 (20.7)187 (18.6)
Differentiation0.579
Good105 (25.6)240 (23.9)
Moderate172 (42.0)411 (40.9)
Poor133 (32.4)354 (35.2)
Histologic types0.277
Adenocarcinoma337811
Mucinous adenocacinoma69164
Squamous carcinoma430
Operation types0.640
High anterior resection20 (4.9)38 (3.8)
Low anterior resection124 (30.2)284 (28.3)
Ultralow anterior resection189 (46.1)482 (48.0)
Colo-anal anastomosis77 (18.8)201 (20.0)
Volume of bleeding (mL)78.5 ± 30.080.8 ± 28.50.940
Operation time (min)115.5 ± 35.8114.6 ± 33.40.217
Lymph node counts12.412.70.796
Proximal margin of distance (cm)3.53.30.105
Distal margin of distance (cm)7.06.90.780
Table 3 Postoperative recovery of the two groups
Minilaparotomy groupTraditional laparotomy groupP value
Recovery
Aerofluxus (d)3.5 ± 1.14.3 ± 1.80.000
Oral feeding (d)4.1 ± 1.24.6 ± 1.20.628
Defecation (d)5.0 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.50.370
Ambulation (d)3.2 ± 0.83.9 ± 2.30.000
Hospital stay (d)6.4 ± 1.59.7 ± 2.20.000
POSSUM scores (%)
Predictive mortality28.126.80.738
Predictive morbidity5.35.00.844
Complications
Gastric retention8 (2.0)18 (1.8)0.494
Incision infection6 (1.5)15 (1.5)0.592
Pulmonary infection5 (1.2)14 (1.4)0.513
Anastomosis leakage2 (0.5)48 (4.8)0.000
Intestinal obstruction9 (2.2)73 (7.3)0.000
Other13 (3.2)35 (3.5)0.456
Table 4 Colorectal cancer surgery study results regarding local recurrence and survival rates (%)
Another preferenceLocal recurrenceSurvival rate
Our study1.479.7
Andreoni et al[30]8.271.0
Law et al[31]9.666.5
Jung et al[7]8.062.0