Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2012; 18(32): 4363-4370
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Table 1 Results of the gastroesophageal reflux disease impact scale questionnaire before and after proton pump inhibitor therapy
How often have you had the following symptoms: (GIS questionnaire)Before PPI therapy
After PPI therapy
P value
AlwaysOftenSometimesNeverAlwaysOftenSometimesNever
Pain in your chest or behind the breastbone?10000010NS
Burning sensation in your chest or behind the breastbone?1041031110< 0.05
Regurgitation or acid taste in your mouth?25201134< 0.05
Pain or burning in your upper stomach?12200113< 0.05
Sore throat or hoarseness that is related to your heartburn or acid reflux?2759023864NS
Table 2 Results of the visual analytic scale
SymptomsPre-PPIPost-PPIP value
Chest pain7.1 ± 2.43.3 ± 0.90.00011
Heartburn8.5 ± 3.22.3 ± 1.10.00011
Regurgitation6.8 ± 1.54.1 ± 1.90.00011
Epigastric pain5.9 ± 3.63.7 ± 2.40.0021
Hoarseness7.4 ± 2.26.8 ± 2.70.273
Globus9.3 ± 3.87.9 ± 3.50.087
Cough7.9 ± 2.66.8 ± 2.80.069
Throat discomfort8.1 ± 3.46.9 ± 2.10.058
Dysphonia6.5 ± 2.15.5 ± 3.50.121
Table 3 Laryngoscopic findings with the reflux finding score in 41 patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, classified using multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring
Laryngoscopic findingsOrdinal scaleERD/NERD (5)HE (11)No GERD1 (25)P value
Infraglottic oedema (pseudosulcus)0 = Absent410230.592
2 = Present112
Ventricular obliteration0 = None48210.553
2 = Partial134
4 = Complete000
Erythema/hyperemia0 = None0010.474
2 = Arytenoids only2615
4 = Diffuse359
Vocal fold oedema0 = None37190.375
1 = Mild214
2 = Moderate032
3 = Severe000
4 = Polypoid000
Diffuse laryngeal oedema0 = None04100.271
1 = Mild147
2 = Moderate235
3 = Severe203
4 = Obstructing000
Posterior commissure hypertrophy0 = None0000.763
1 = Mild2512
2 = Moderate1510
3 = Severe213
4 = Obstructing000
Granuloma/granulation0 = Absent510240.876
2 = Present011
Thick endolaryngeal mucus0 = Absent27120.909
2 = Present3410
Table 4 Correlation between multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH analysis and the reflux finding score/ reflux symptom index analysis
ERD/NERDHENo GERD1P value
AET (%)7.4 ± 3.23.5 ± 1.71.9 ± 0.8< 0.05
Reflux number (n)103.2 ± 12.144.7 ± 6.235.1 ± 7.4< 0.05
Proximal refluxes (mean %)312918< 0.05
Acid refluxes (n)62.5 ± 15.432.9 ± 5.119.7 ± 6.2< 0.05
Non-acid refluxes (n)40.1 ± 7.613.1 ± 4.415.8 ± 4.9< 0.05
Gas refluxes (n)11.6 ± 9.713.1 ± 8.121.7 ± 15.3< 0.05
SAP/SIPositivePositiveNegative-
RFS10.9 ± 3.39.1 ± 2.77.6 ± 3.1NS
RSI14.3 ± 5.216.3 ± 4.715.8 ± 4.9NS
Table 5 Results of nominal and numerical correlation
Nominal correlation
Numerical correlation
RFSRSIRGERFSRSI
AET (%)NSNSP < 0.001NSNS
Total reflux numberNSNSP < 0.001NSNS
Acid reflux numberNSNSP < 0.05NSNS
Non-acid reflux numberNSNSP < 0.05NSNS
Proximal reflux numberNSNSP < 0.04NSNS
SAPNSNSP < 0.009NSNS
Gas refluxesP = 0.028NSNSP = 0.026NS
Upper endoscopyNSP < 0.001P = 0.009NSNS
MII-pH (diagnosis)NSNSP < 0.001NSNS