Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2012; 18(32): 4363-4370
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Table 1 Results of the gastroesophageal reflux disease impact scale questionnaire before and after proton pump inhibitor therapy
How often have you had the following symptoms: (GIS questionnaire) | Before PPI therapy | After PPI therapy | P value | ||||||
Always | Often | Sometimes | Never | Always | Often | Sometimes | Never | ||
Pain in your chest or behind the breastbone? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NS |
Burning sensation in your chest or behind the breastbone? | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | < 0.05 |
Regurgitation or acid taste in your mouth? | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | < 0.05 |
Pain or burning in your upper stomach? | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | < 0.05 |
Sore throat or hoarseness that is related to your heartburn or acid reflux? | 27 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 23 | 8 | 6 | 4 | NS |
Table 2 Results of the visual analytic scale
Symptoms | Pre-PPI | Post-PPI | P value |
Chest pain | 7.1 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 0.00011 |
Heartburn | 8.5 ± 3.2 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 0.00011 |
Regurgitation | 6.8 ± 1.5 | 4.1 ± 1.9 | 0.00011 |
Epigastric pain | 5.9 ± 3.6 | 3.7 ± 2.4 | 0.0021 |
Hoarseness | 7.4 ± 2.2 | 6.8 ± 2.7 | 0.273 |
Globus | 9.3 ± 3.8 | 7.9 ± 3.5 | 0.087 |
Cough | 7.9 ± 2.6 | 6.8 ± 2.8 | 0.069 |
Throat discomfort | 8.1 ± 3.4 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 0.058 |
Dysphonia | 6.5 ± 2.1 | 5.5 ± 3.5 | 0.121 |
Table 3 Laryngoscopic findings with the reflux finding score in 41 patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, classified using multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring
Laryngoscopic findings | Ordinal scale | ERD/NERD (5) | HE (11) | No GERD1 (25) | P value |
Infraglottic oedema (pseudosulcus) | 0 = Absent | 4 | 10 | 23 | 0.592 |
2 = Present | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Ventricular obliteration | 0 = None | 4 | 8 | 21 | 0.553 |
2 = Partial | 1 | 3 | 4 | ||
4 = Complete | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Erythema/hyperemia | 0 = None | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.474 |
2 = Arytenoids only | 2 | 6 | 15 | ||
4 = Diffuse | 3 | 5 | 9 | ||
Vocal fold oedema | 0 = None | 3 | 7 | 19 | 0.375 |
1 = Mild | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||
2 = Moderate | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
3 = Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
4 = Polypoid | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Diffuse laryngeal oedema | 0 = None | 0 | 4 | 10 | 0.271 |
1 = Mild | 1 | 4 | 7 | ||
2 = Moderate | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||
3 = Severe | 2 | 0 | 3 | ||
4 = Obstructing | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Posterior commissure hypertrophy | 0 = None | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.763 |
1 = Mild | 2 | 5 | 12 | ||
2 = Moderate | 1 | 5 | 10 | ||
3 = Severe | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
4 = Obstructing | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Granuloma/granulation | 0 = Absent | 5 | 10 | 24 | 0.876 |
2 = Present | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
Thick endolaryngeal mucus | 0 = Absent | 2 | 7 | 12 | 0.909 |
2 = Present | 3 | 4 | 10 |
Table 4 Correlation between multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH analysis and the reflux finding score/ reflux symptom index analysis
ERD/NERD | HE | No GERD1 | P value | |
AET (%) | 7.4 ± 3.2 | 3.5 ± 1.7 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | < 0.05 |
Reflux number (n) | 103.2 ± 12.1 | 44.7 ± 6.2 | 35.1 ± 7.4 | < 0.05 |
Proximal refluxes (mean %) | 31 | 29 | 18 | < 0.05 |
Acid refluxes (n) | 62.5 ± 15.4 | 32.9 ± 5.1 | 19.7 ± 6.2 | < 0.05 |
Non-acid refluxes (n) | 40.1 ± 7.6 | 13.1 ± 4.4 | 15.8 ± 4.9 | < 0.05 |
Gas refluxes (n) | 11.6 ± 9.7 | 13.1 ± 8.1 | 21.7 ± 15.3 | < 0.05 |
SAP/SI | Positive | Positive | Negative | - |
RFS | 10.9 ± 3.3 | 9.1 ± 2.7 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | NS |
RSI | 14.3 ± 5.2 | 16.3 ± 4.7 | 15.8 ± 4.9 | NS |
Table 5 Results of nominal and numerical correlation
Nominal correlation | Numerical correlation | ||||
RFS | RSI | RGE | RFS | RSI | |
AET (%) | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
Total reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
Acid reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.05 | NS | NS |
Non-acid reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.05 | NS | NS |
Proximal reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.04 | NS | NS |
SAP | NS | NS | P < 0.009 | NS | NS |
Gas refluxes | P = 0.028 | NS | NS | P = 0.026 | NS |
Upper endoscopy | NS | P < 0.001 | P = 0.009 | NS | NS |
MII-pH (diagnosis) | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
- Citation: de Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E, Martinucci I, Bellini M, Fattori B, Ceccarelli L, Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ricchiuti A, Savarino V, Berrettini S, Marchi S. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(32): 4363-4370
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i32/4363.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363