Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2012; 18(32): 4308-4316
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4308
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4308
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients and conventional endoscopic findings n (%)
HPs | TSAs | SSA/Ps | |
Cases (n) | 23 | 39 | 50 |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 58.9 ± 12.8 | 61.9 ± 13.6 | 63.7 ± 10.6 |
Location | |||
Right side of colon | 7 (30.4) | 8 (20.5) | 42 (84.0) |
Left side of colon | 16 (69.6) | 15 (79.5) | 8 (16.0) |
Morphology | |||
Flat type | 7 (30.4) | 2 (5.0) | 45 (90.0) |
Protruded type | 16 (69.6) | 37 (95.0) | 5 (10.0) |
Color | |||
NC | 8 (34.8) | 4 (10.3) | 40 (80.0) |
RC | 15 (65.2) | 35 (89.7) | 10 (20.0) |
Mucin | |||
With | 5 (21.7) | 7 (17.9) | 36 (72.0) |
Without | 18 (78.3) | 32 (82.1) | 14 (28.0) |
Size (mm), mean ± SD | 7.74 ± 3.24 | 9.89 ± 5.73 | 13.42 ± 8.62 |
Table 2 Comparison of the magnified colonoscopic findings and pathological diagnoses
Pit pattern | n | HPs(n = 23) | TSAs(n = 38) | TSAs + cancer(n = 1) | SSA/Ps +α(n = 47) | SSA/Ps + cancer(n = 3) |
Type II | 17 | 14 | 3 | |||
Alone | 16 | 13 | 3 | |||
With IV-S | 1 | 1 | ||||
Type II-L | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
Alone | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||
With IV-S | 5 | 4 | 1 | |||
Type II-O | 49 | 4 | 4 | 38 | 3 | |
Alone | 30 | 3 | 27 | |||
With II-L | 9 | 1 | 8 | |||
With IV-S | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
With VI | 3 | 3 | ||||
Type IV-S | 31 | 1 | 29 | 1 | ||
Alone | 28 | 1 | 27 | |||
With II-L | 2 | 2 | ||||
With VI | 1 | 1 |
- Citation: Ishigooka S, Nomoto M, Obinata N, Oishi Y, Sato Y, Nakatsu S, Suzuki M, Ikeda Y, Maehata T, Kimura T, Watanabe Y, Nakajima T, Yamano HO, Yasuda H, Itoh F. Evaluation of magnifying colonoscopy in the diagnosis of serrated polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(32): 4308-4316
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i32/4308.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4308