Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3590-3594
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590
Table 1 Demographic and previous medical history of subjects
Demographic data | n (%) |
Gender | |
Male | 207 (44) |
Female | 263 (56) |
Race | |
Malays | 370 (78.7) |
Chinese | 75 (16.0) |
Others | 25 (5.3) |
Educations levels | |
Higher | 169 (36.0) |
Lower/none | 301 (64.0) |
Employments status | |
Working | 356 (75.7) |
Not working | 114 (24.3) |
Marital status | |
Married | 325 (69.1) |
Single | 129 (27.4) |
Others | 16 (3.4) |
Previous colonoscopy | 65 (13.8) |
Family history of cancer | 93 (19.8) |
Gastric | 15 (3.2) |
Colorectal | 35 (7.4) |
Breast | 17 (3.6) |
Obstetric and gynecology | 8 (1.7) |
Pulmonary | 12 (2.6) |
Table 2 Factors associated with likelihood for subjects to agree to undergo screening colonoscopy despite their preferences not being met
Parameters | Will undergo SC | P value |
Recommended age | ||
Yes | 102 (86.4) | 0.222 |
No | 287 (81.5) | |
Gender | ||
Male | 180 (87.0) | 0.033 |
Female | 209 (79.5) | |
Race | ||
Malays | 308 (81.1) | 0.043 |
Non-malays | 81 (90.0) | |
Education | ||
Higher | 134 (79.3) | 0.135 |
Lower/none | 255 (84.7) | |
Marital status | ||
Single | 102 (79.1) | 0.192 |
Married/widowed | 287 (84.2) | |
Employment | ||
Yes | 294 (82.6) | 0.854 |
No | 95 (83.3) | |
Previous colonoscopy | ||
Yes | 62 (95.4) | 0.004 |
No | 327 (80.7) | |
Family history of cancer | ||
Yes | 76 (81.7) | 0.766 |
No | 313 (83.0) | |
Family history of CRC | ||
Yes | 28 (80.0) | 0.652 |
No | 361 (83.0) |
Table 3 Multivariate analysis showing willingness to undergo screening colonoscopy despite preferences not being met
Variables | OR | 95% CI | P value |
Gender | |||
Male vs female | 1.68 | 1.00-2.82 | 0.049 |
Race | |||
Malays vs non-malays | 1.94 | 0.910-4.130 | 0.086 |
Previous colonoscopy | |||
Yes vs no | 4.70 | 1.41-15.66 | 0.012 |
Table 4 Comparison of gender preference during colonoscopy
Authors (yr) | Subjects | Setting | Genders | Population | Gender preference |
Fidler et al[14], 2000 | Patients undergoing colonoscopy | Endoscopy | Both | United Kingdom | Women (48%) and men (0%) |
Varadarajulu et al[15], 2002 | Patients undergoing colonoscopy | Endoscopy | Both | United States | Overall (26%): Women (45%) and men (4.3%). No difference post procedure |
Menees et al[16], 2005 | Subjects not scheduled | Clinics | Female | United States | 44.4% expressed preference [endoscopist: Women (43%) and men (1.4%)] |
Lee et al[17], 2008 | Subjects not scheduled for colonoscopy | Clinics | Female | South Korea | 45.5% expressed preference [endoscopist: Women (32.1%) and men (13.4%)] |
Schneider et al[18], 2009 | Patients undergoing colonoscopy | Endoscopy | Both | United States | Women (42%) and men (24%) |
Zapatier et al[19], 2011 | Patients not scheduled for colonoscopy | Clinics | Both | United States | Overall (25.7%): Women (30.8%) and men (20.4%); women: Hispanic (35%) and Caucasian; men (20.4%): Hispanic men |
Shah et al[20], 2011 | Patients not scheduled for colonoscopy | Primary clinics | Both | United States | Patients: Women (53%) and men (27.8%); Health care professionals: Women (43.1%) and men (26.1%) |
Present study, 2012 | Subjects not scheduled for colonoscopy | Clinics | Both | Southeast Asia | Endoscopists: Women (70%; women 67.7% and men 2.3%); men (62.8%; women 6.8% and 56% men)Assistants: Women (74.5%; women 73.4% and men 1.1%); men (58%; women 8.7% and 49.3% men) |
- Citation: Chong VH. Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: Impact of endoscopy nurses. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3590-3594
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3590.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590