Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Table 1 Colonoscopy quality indicators
Patient demographics and history |
Age |
Sex |
MRN |
Management plans |
Informed consent documentation |
Previous GI procedures: documented date (yes/no) |
Documentation of ASA classification |
Indications for procedure |
Average risk |
Increased risk |
Incomplete colonoscopy |
Post adenoma resection |
Procedure: Technical description |
Date and time |
Sedation |
Level of difficulty of the procedure |
Bowel preparation |
Type and dosage |
Quality |
Actual extent of examination |
Cecal intubation (yes/no) |
Documentation of cecal landmarks |
Appendiceal orifice |
Ileocecal valve |
Total and withdrawal time recorded (yes/no) |
Colonoscopic findings |
Colonic polyp(s): |
Number |
Size |
Morphology |
Morphology anatomic location |
Method of removal |
Completeness of removal (yes/no) |
Retrieved (yes/no) |
Sent to pathology (yes/no) |
Interventions/unplanned events |
Unplanned interventions and complications |
Documentation of discharge plans (info to patient, info to referring MD) |
Pathology |
Documentation of pathology results to the patient and the physician |
Adenoma detection (yes/no) |
Cancer detection (yes/no) |
Table 2 Patient population and endoscopists description n (%)
Patients (n = 250)endoscopists (n = 11) | |
Mean age (yr) | 63.2 ± 10.5 |
Sex | |
Women | 107 (42.8) |
Men | 143 (57.2) |
Procedure indications | |
Average risk | 85 (38.5) |
Past personal history | 90 (43.3) |
Past family history | 42 (20.2) |
HNPCC | 1 (1.4) |
FAP | 1 (1.4) |
Specialty of endoscopists | |
Surgical | 3 (27.3) |
GI | 8 (72.7) |
Average years of endoscopists practice (yr) | 17.1 ± 8.5 |
Table 3 Pre-procedure indicators n (%)
Quality indicator sought in the report | (n = 250) |
Consent documentation | 250 (100.0) |
Management plan for anticoagulation1 | 1 (0.5; 95% CI: 0.0-1.5) |
Previous GI colonoscopy date1 | 24 (14.0; 95% CI: 8.7-19.2) |
ASA classification | 0 (0) |
Previous polyp resection | 20 (12.7; 95% CI: 7.4-17.9) |
Details available | 5 (25.0; 95% CI: 4.2-45.8) |
1-2 tubular adenoma < 1 cm | 2 (33.3; 95% CI: 0.0-87.5) |
3-10 tubular adenoma > 1 cm | 1 (16.7; 95% CI: 0.0-59.9) |
10 adenomas | 1 (16.7; 95% CI: 0.0-59.9) |
Sessile adenoma > 2 cm | 1 (16.7; 95% CI: 0.0-59.9) |
Table 4 Procedural indicators and colonoscopic findings n (%)
Procedural indicators | |
Quality indicator sought in the report | n = 250 |
Date of exam | 246 (98.4, 95% CI: 96.8-100.0) |
Medications with dosage | 248 (99.2, 95% CI: 98.1-100.0) |
Level of difficulty | 247 (98.8, 95% CI: 97.4-100.0) |
Bowel preparation quality | |
Poor | 10 (4.0, 95% CI: 1.6-6.5) |
Fair | 27 (10.8, 95% CI: 7.0-14.7) |
Good | 212 (85.1, 95% CI: 80.7-89.6) |
Actual extent of examination | |
Cecum | 236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.7-97.3) |
Ascending colon | 6 (2.4, 95% CI: 0.5-4.3) |
Transverse colon | 2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9) |
Descending colon | 2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9) |
Recto sigmoid | 4 (1.6, 95% CI: 0.0-3.2) |
Cecal intubation | 236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3) |
Photodocumentation | 186 (74.4, 95% CI: 69.0-79.8) |
Documentation of cecal landmarks | |
Appendiceal orifice | 168 (67.2, 95% CI: 61.2-73.2) |
Ileocecal valve | 103 (41.2, 95% CI: 35.1-73.1) |
Retroflexion in rectum | 177 (70.8, 95% CI: 65.1-76.5) |
Withdrawal time | 0 (0) |
Total time | 0 (0) |
Intra-procedural complications | 1 (0.4, 95% CI: 0.0-1.2) |
Colonoscopic findings: polyps | |
Polyp findings | 111 (44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6) |
Mean polyp number | 2.2 ± 2.5 |
Polyp size documented | 73 (65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7) |
Mean polyp size (mm) | 17.6 ± 33.1 |
Morphology | |
Documented | 69 (62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3) |
Pedunculated | 17 (23.9, 95% CI: 13.8-34.1) |
Sessile | 56 (80.0, 95% CI: 70.4-89.6) |
Anatomic location documented | 110 (99.1, 95% CI: 97.3-100.0) |
Method of removal | |
Cold biopsy | 28 (25.2, 95% CI: 17.0-33.4) |
Cold snare | 20 (18.0, 95% CI: 10.8-25.3) |
Snare cautery | 35 (31.5, 95% CI: 22.8-40.3) |
Not mentioned | 23 (20.7, 95% CI: 13.1-28.4) |
Retrieved | 72 (84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5) |
Sent to pathology | 85 (76.5, 95% CI: 67.3-85.7) |
Table 5 Comparison between national United States study and the current audit
% | Current audit (%) | |
Patient characteristics | ||
Women | 49 | 42.8, 95% CI: 36.6-49.0 |
Men | 51 | 57.2, 95% CI: 51.0-63.4 |
Average risk | 29.6 | 38.5, 95% CI: 32.0-44.9 |
Past family history | 13.4 | 20.2, 95% CI: 14.7-25.7 |
Past personal history | 19 | 43.3, 95% CI: 36.5-50.1 |
Presence of recorded variables | ||
ASA classification | 89.9 | 0 |
Bowel preparation quality | 86.1 | 99.6, 95% CI: 98.8-100.0 |
Previous GI colonoscopy date | 33.9 | 14.0, 95% CI: 8.7-19.2 |
Cecal landmarks | 85.9 | 67.2, 95% CI: 61.3-73.1 |
Polyp size | 90 | 65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7 |
Polyp morphology | 85.3 | 62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3 |
Polyp retrieval | 95.5 | 84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5 |
Endoscopic outcomes | ||
Cecal intubation | 96.3 | 94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3 |
Polyp findings | 36.3 | 44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6 |
- Citation: Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551