Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557 [PMID: 22826619 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Alan Barkun, MD, CM, FRCP(C), FACP, FACG, FAGA, MSc (Clinical Epidemiology), Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital site, 1650 cedar Avenue, room D7-346, Montréal H3G 1A4, Canada. alan.barkun@muhc.mcgill.ca
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Procedural indicators and colonoscopic findings n (%)
Procedural indicators
Quality indicator sought in the report
n = 250
Date of exam
246 (98.4, 95% CI: 96.8-100.0)
Medications with dosage
248 (99.2, 95% CI: 98.1-100.0)
Level of difficulty
247 (98.8, 95% CI: 97.4-100.0)
Bowel preparation quality
Poor
10 (4.0, 95% CI: 1.6-6.5)
Fair
27 (10.8, 95% CI: 7.0-14.7)
Good
212 (85.1, 95% CI: 80.7-89.6)
Actual extent of examination
Cecum
236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.7-97.3)
Ascending colon
6 (2.4, 95% CI: 0.5-4.3)
Transverse colon
2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9)
Descending colon
2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9)
Recto sigmoid
4 (1.6, 95% CI: 0.0-3.2)
Cecal intubation
236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3)
Photodocumentation
186 (74.4, 95% CI: 69.0-79.8)
Documentation of cecal landmarks
Appendiceal orifice
168 (67.2, 95% CI: 61.2-73.2)
Ileocecal valve
103 (41.2, 95% CI: 35.1-73.1)
Retroflexion in rectum
177 (70.8, 95% CI: 65.1-76.5)
Withdrawal time
0 (0)
Total time
0 (0)
Intra-procedural complications
1 (0.4, 95% CI: 0.0-1.2)
Colonoscopic findings: polyps
Polyp findings
111 (44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6)
Mean polyp number
2.2 ± 2.5
Polyp size documented
73 (65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7)
Mean polyp size (mm)
17.6 ± 33.1
Morphology
Documented
69 (62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3)
Pedunculated
17 (23.9, 95% CI: 13.8-34.1)
Sessile
56 (80.0, 95% CI: 70.4-89.6)
Anatomic location documented
110 (99.1, 95% CI: 97.3-100.0)
Method of removal
Cold biopsy
28 (25.2, 95% CI: 17.0-33.4)
Cold snare
20 (18.0, 95% CI: 10.8-25.3)
Snare cautery
35 (31.5, 95% CI: 22.8-40.3)
Not mentioned
23 (20.7, 95% CI: 13.1-28.4)
Retrieved
72 (84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5)
Sent to pathology
85 (76.5, 95% CI: 67.3-85.7)
Table 5 Comparison between national United States study and the current audit
%
Current audit (%)
Patient characteristics
Women
49
42.8, 95% CI: 36.6-49.0
Men
51
57.2, 95% CI: 51.0-63.4
Average risk
29.6
38.5, 95% CI: 32.0-44.9
Past family history
13.4
20.2, 95% CI: 14.7-25.7
Past personal history
19
43.3, 95% CI: 36.5-50.1
Presence of recorded variables
ASA classification
89.9
0
Bowel preparation quality
86.1
99.6, 95% CI: 98.8-100.0
Previous GI colonoscopy date
33.9
14.0, 95% CI: 8.7-19.2
Cecal landmarks
85.9
67.2, 95% CI: 61.3-73.1
Polyp size
90
65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7
Polyp morphology
85.3
62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3
Polyp retrieval
95.5
84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5
Endoscopic outcomes
Cecal intubation
96.3
94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3
Polyp findings
36.3
44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6
Citation: Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557