Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2012; 18(23): 2979-2987
Published online Jun 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979
Table 1 Patients baseline characteristics
n = 138%
Age59.6 ± 11.1 (range: 33-84)
Sex
M/F114/2482.6/17.4
Etiology of liver disease
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown 89/15/10/2464.5/10.9/7.2/17.4
AFP (ng/mL)9512.9 ± 23 026.4
PIVKAII (mAU/mL)854.2 ± 871.7
Tumor morphology
Nodular/infiltrating78/6056.5/43.6
Tumor size (mm)69.8 ± 45.2
Tumor number
1/≥ 252/8637.7/62.3
PVTT
Yes5439.1
Child-Pugh classification
A/B/C77/56/555.8/40.6/3.6
Tumor stage1
I/II/III/IVa/IVb 7/34/26/22/495.1/24.6/18.8/15.9/35.5
SUV
Iso-/hypometabolism42/330.4/2.2
Hypermetabolism9367.4
Maximum5.32 ± 2.38
Average4.03 ± 1.26
TNR (SUV ratio)1.60 ± 0.49
Extrahepatic metastases5036.2
Lung2346.0
Lymph nodes2244.0
Bone1122.0
Others2510.0
Table 2 Correlation of histologic grade with clinical factors and tumor characteristics n (%)
Low-grade (n = 34)High-grade (n = 12)P value1
Age61.7 ± 8.456.5 ± 6.70.055
Sex0.260
M/F32 (94.1)/210 (83.3)/2
Etiology of liver disease0.431
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown21/2/2/99/0/1/2
AFP (ng/mL)2892.0 ± 9255.62960.5 ± 9554.00.930
<200/≥ 20026 (76.5)/810 (83.3)/2
PIVKAII (mAU/mL) (n = 20/n = 7)758.4 ± 823.1798.6 ± 879.61.000
< 40/≥ 403 (15)/171 (16.7)/6
Tumor morphology0.441
Nodular/infiltrating24 (70.6)/108 (66.7)/4
Tumor size0.643
< 5/≥ 516 (47.1)/187 (58.3)/5
Tumor number0.297
1/≥ 220 (58.8)/149 (75)/3
PVTT0.259
Yes8 (23.5)1 (8.3)
Child-Pugh classification0.563
A/B/C30 (88.2)/4/011(91.7)/1/0
T stage0.537
1/2/3/43/15/9/71/7/2/2
SUV
Isometabolism14 (41.2)2 (16.7)0.061
Hypometabolism20
Hypermetabolism (n = 18/n = 10)
Maximum3.75 ± 0.745.75 ± 2.150.027
Average3.30 ± 0.424.15 ± 1.170.226
TNR (SUV ratio)1.33 ± 0.221.64 ± 0.520.286
Table 3 Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and conventional imaging modalities for detection of extrahepatic metastases
Lung metastases (n = 23)Lymph node metastases (n = 22)Bone metastases (n = 11)
TPTNTPTNTPTN
PET (+)141204110
Conventional (+)23222474
PETConventionalPETConventionalPETConventional
Sensitivity, %60.910090.910010063.6
Specificity, %99.198.296.596.510096.8
Accuracy, %92.698.595.697.110094.1
PPV, %93.39283.384.610063.6
NPV, %92.510098.210010096.8
Comparison of ROC curvesP = 0.000P = 0.269P = 0.010
(CI: 0.0888-0.294)(CI: 0.0481-0.348)
Table 4 Clinical factors and tumor characteristics of extrahepatic metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma
Metastasis (n = 50)No metastasis (n = 88)P value
UniMulti
Age58.7 ± 11.160.1 ± 11.10.480
Sex0.285
M/F39/1175/13
Etiology of liver disease0.215
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown31/3/4/1258/12/6/12
AFP (ng/mL)15 568.8 ± 28 119.66072.1 ± 18 882.30.0190.254
< 200/≥ 200 (%)21/29 (58.0)59/29 (33.0)
PIVKAII (mAU/mL)1320.5 ± 784.0630 ± 827.90.001
< 40/≥ 40 (n = 25/n = 52) (%)2/23 (92.0)18/34 (65.4)
Tumor morphology0.0000.126
Nodular/infiltrating (%)17/33 (66.0)61/27 (30.7)
Tumor size88.9 ± 40.258.9 ± 44.50.0000.0421
< 5/≥ 5 (%)7/43 (86.0)48/40 (45.5)
Tumor number0.0000.382
1/≥ 2 (%)7/43 (86.0)45/43 (48.9)
PVTT0.0000.330
Yes (%)30 (60.0)24 (27.2)
Child-Pugh classification0.474
A/B/C35/11/468/19/1
T stage0.0000.197
1/2/3/4 (%)1/4/12/33 (66.0)7/34/26/21 (23.9)
SUV
Isometabolism (%)3 (6.0)39 (44.3)0.0000.035
Hypometabolism03
Hypermetabolism (n = 47)
Maximum5.89 ± 2.554.74 ± 2.050.0190.517
Average4.38 ± 1.353.68 ± 1.050.0060.0282
TNR (SUV ratio)1.70 ± 0.511.50 ± 0.450.0480.352
Pathology0.042
Low-/high-grade (n = 12/n = 34) (%)7 (58.3)/527 (79.4)/7
Table 5 Clinical factors that affected survival by multivariate analysis
Odds ratioCIP value
Child class B4.7842.575-8.8910.000
Child class C10.7873.579-32.5110.000
AFP (> 200 ng/mL)1.8250.998-3.3380.051
Tumor size (> 5 cm)1.0041.000-1.0090.060
Metastases2.0691.152-3.7150.015