Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2012; 18(23): 2979-2987
Published online Jun 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979
Published online Jun 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979
Table 1 Patients baseline characteristics
n = 138 | % | |
Age | 59.6 ± 11.1 (range: 33-84) | |
Sex | ||
M/F | 114/24 | 82.6/17.4 |
Etiology of liver disease | ||
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown | 89/15/10/24 | 64.5/10.9/7.2/17.4 |
AFP (ng/mL) | 9512.9 ± 23 026.4 | |
PIVKAII (mAU/mL) | 854.2 ± 871.7 | |
Tumor morphology | ||
Nodular/infiltrating | 78/60 | 56.5/43.6 |
Tumor size (mm) | 69.8 ± 45.2 | |
Tumor number | ||
1/≥ 2 | 52/86 | 37.7/62.3 |
PVTT | ||
Yes | 54 | 39.1 |
Child-Pugh classification | ||
A/B/C | 77/56/5 | 55.8/40.6/3.6 |
Tumor stage1 | ||
I/II/III/IVa/IVb | 7/34/26/22/49 | 5.1/24.6/18.8/15.9/35.5 |
SUV | ||
Iso-/hypometabolism | 42/3 | 30.4/2.2 |
Hypermetabolism | 93 | 67.4 |
Maximum | 5.32 ± 2.38 | |
Average | 4.03 ± 1.26 | |
TNR (SUV ratio) | 1.60 ± 0.49 | |
Extrahepatic metastases | 50 | 36.2 |
Lung | 23 | 46.0 |
Lymph nodes | 22 | 44.0 |
Bone | 11 | 22.0 |
Others2 | 5 | 10.0 |
Table 2 Correlation of histologic grade with clinical factors and tumor characteristics n (%)
Low-grade (n = 34) | High-grade (n = 12) | P value1 | |
Age | 61.7 ± 8.4 | 56.5 ± 6.7 | 0.055 |
Sex | 0.260 | ||
M/F | 32 (94.1)/2 | 10 (83.3)/2 | |
Etiology of liver disease | 0.431 | ||
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown | 21/2/2/9 | 9/0/1/2 | |
AFP (ng/mL) | 2892.0 ± 9255.6 | 2960.5 ± 9554.0 | 0.930 |
<200/≥ 200 | 26 (76.5)/8 | 10 (83.3)/2 | |
PIVKAII (mAU/mL) (n = 20/n = 7) | 758.4 ± 823.1 | 798.6 ± 879.6 | 1.000 |
< 40/≥ 40 | 3 (15)/17 | 1 (16.7)/6 | |
Tumor morphology | 0.441 | ||
Nodular/infiltrating | 24 (70.6)/10 | 8 (66.7)/4 | |
Tumor size | 0.643 | ||
< 5/≥ 5 | 16 (47.1)/18 | 7 (58.3)/5 | |
Tumor number | 0.297 | ||
1/≥ 2 | 20 (58.8)/14 | 9 (75)/3 | |
PVTT | 0.259 | ||
Yes | 8 (23.5) | 1 (8.3) | |
Child-Pugh classification | 0.563 | ||
A/B/C | 30 (88.2)/4/0 | 11(91.7)/1/0 | |
T stage | 0.537 | ||
1/2/3/4 | 3/15/9/7 | 1/7/2/2 | |
SUV | |||
Isometabolism | 14 (41.2) | 2 (16.7) | 0.061 |
Hypometabolism | 2 | 0 | |
Hypermetabolism (n = 18/n = 10) | |||
Maximum | 3.75 ± 0.74 | 5.75 ± 2.15 | 0.027 |
Average | 3.30 ± 0.42 | 4.15 ± 1.17 | 0.226 |
TNR (SUV ratio) | 1.33 ± 0.22 | 1.64 ± 0.52 | 0.286 |
Table 3 Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and conventional imaging modalities for detection of extrahepatic metastases
Lung metastases (n = 23) | Lymph node metastases (n = 22) | Bone metastases (n = 11) | ||||
TP | TN | TP | TN | TP | TN | |
PET (+) | 14 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
Conventional (+) | 23 | 2 | 22 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
PET | Conventional | PET | Conventional | PET | Conventional | |
Sensitivity, % | 60.9 | 100 | 90.9 | 100 | 100 | 63.6 |
Specificity, % | 99.1 | 98.2 | 96.5 | 96.5 | 100 | 96.8 |
Accuracy, % | 92.6 | 98.5 | 95.6 | 97.1 | 100 | 94.1 |
PPV, % | 93.3 | 92 | 83.3 | 84.6 | 100 | 63.6 |
NPV, % | 92.5 | 100 | 98.2 | 100 | 100 | 96.8 |
Comparison of ROC curves | P = 0.000 | P = 0.269 | P = 0.010 | |||
(CI: 0.0888-0.294) | (CI: 0.0481-0.348) |
Table 4 Clinical factors and tumor characteristics of extrahepatic metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma
Metastasis (n = 50) | No metastasis (n = 88) | P value | ||
Uni | Multi | |||
Age | 58.7 ± 11.1 | 60.1 ± 11.1 | 0.480 | |
Sex | 0.285 | |||
M/F | 39/11 | 75/13 | ||
Etiology of liver disease | 0.215 | |||
HBV/HCV/alcohol/unknown | 31/3/4/12 | 58/12/6/12 | ||
AFP (ng/mL) | 15 568.8 ± 28 119.6 | 6072.1 ± 18 882.3 | 0.019 | 0.254 |
< 200/≥ 200 (%) | 21/29 (58.0) | 59/29 (33.0) | ||
PIVKAII (mAU/mL) | 1320.5 ± 784.0 | 630 ± 827.9 | 0.001 | |
< 40/≥ 40 (n = 25/n = 52) (%) | 2/23 (92.0) | 18/34 (65.4) | ||
Tumor morphology | 0.000 | 0.126 | ||
Nodular/infiltrating (%) | 17/33 (66.0) | 61/27 (30.7) | ||
Tumor size | 88.9 ± 40.2 | 58.9 ± 44.5 | 0.000 | 0.0421 |
< 5/≥ 5 (%) | 7/43 (86.0) | 48/40 (45.5) | ||
Tumor number | 0.000 | 0.382 | ||
1/≥ 2 (%) | 7/43 (86.0) | 45/43 (48.9) | ||
PVTT | 0.000 | 0.330 | ||
Yes (%) | 30 (60.0) | 24 (27.2) | ||
Child-Pugh classification | 0.474 | |||
A/B/C | 35/11/4 | 68/19/1 | ||
T stage | 0.000 | 0.197 | ||
1/2/3/4 (%) | 1/4/12/33 (66.0) | 7/34/26/21 (23.9) | ||
SUV | ||||
Isometabolism (%) | 3 (6.0) | 39 (44.3) | 0.000 | 0.035 |
Hypometabolism | 0 | 3 | ||
Hypermetabolism (n = 47) | ||||
Maximum | 5.89 ± 2.55 | 4.74 ± 2.05 | 0.019 | 0.517 |
Average | 4.38 ± 1.35 | 3.68 ± 1.05 | 0.006 | 0.0282 |
TNR (SUV ratio) | 1.70 ± 0.51 | 1.50 ± 0.45 | 0.048 | 0.352 |
Pathology | 0.042 | |||
Low-/high-grade (n = 12/n = 34) (%) | 7 (58.3)/5 | 27 (79.4)/7 |
Table 5 Clinical factors that affected survival by multivariate analysis
Odds ratio | CI | P value | |
Child class B | 4.784 | 2.575-8.891 | 0.000 |
Child class C | 10.787 | 3.579-32.511 | 0.000 |
AFP (> 200 ng/mL) | 1.825 | 0.998-3.338 | 0.051 |
Tumor size (> 5 cm) | 1.004 | 1.000-1.009 | 0.060 |
Metastases | 2.069 | 1.152-3.715 | 0.015 |
- Citation: Lee JE, Jang JY, Jeong SW, Lee SH, Kim SG, Cha SW, Kim YS, Cho YD, Kim HS, Kim BS, Jin SY, Choi DL. Diagnostic value for extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma in positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(23): 2979-2987
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i23/2979.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979