Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2012; 18(11): 1185-1190
Published online Mar 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1185
Published online Mar 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1185
Table 1 Comparison of management options for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (%)
Procedure | Diagnosis | Therapy | Early rebleeding | Major complications | Colon preparation | Requires active bleed |
Colonoscopy[5-8] | 74-100 | 8-37 | 0-241 | 0-2 | Yes | No |
Sigmoidoscopy[9-11] | About 10 | 0-20 | 0 | Rare | Minimal | No |
Angiography[20,21,26-29]2 | 23-72 | 14-100 | 1-57 | 0-60 | No | Yes |
Radionuclide scan[13-15] | 40-73 | N/A | N/A | Rare | No | Yes |
Multi-detector CT scan[16,18,19] | 24-94 | N/A | N/A | 0%-11% | No | Yes |
- Citation: Lhewa DY, Strate LL. Pros and cons of colonoscopy in management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(11): 1185-1190
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i11/1185.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1185