Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2011; 17(8): 1009-1017
Published online Feb 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.1009
Table 1 Study sample partition by disease type, ethnicity and sex
Ethnicity sex DD siteWhites
Asians
OBs
BAs
Sub-totals by sex
Totals
MFMFMFMFMF
A. LSDD1141763451226126196322
B. RSDD64412441161026
C. R&LDD1310101141191231
D. Pan-DD2026327523323668
No disease150241242034631110219334553
Sub-totals by sex (all)3034573527498523214105901000
Sub-totals by ethnicity (all)76062134444105901000
Sub-totals by sex (DD overall)15321611715221211191256447
Sub-totals by ethnicity (DD overall)369182723191256447
Right-sided component (B+C+D)39408310101056758125
(RSCDD)791120156758125
Table 2 Crude and adjusted associations between the odds of disease, disease subtypes and demographic parameters
Univariate analysis
Adjusted analysis-final models
OR/proportional odds (SE) (95% CI)P valueOR/proportional odds (SE) (95% CI)P value
Disease vs no disease
Asian (vs white)0.43 (0.13) (0.25, 0.76)  0.0040.49 (0.15) (0.27, 0.87)  0.018
OB (vs white)0.40 (0.08) (0.27, 0.61)< 0.0010.43 (0.09) (0.28, 0.65)< 0.001
BA (vs white)1.16 (0.36) (0.63, 2.13)0.631.39 (0.45) (0.74, 2.62)0.31
Sex (F vs M)0.88 (0.11) (0.68, 1.13)0.32--
Age (yr) (proportional odds)1.06 (0.007) (1.04, 1.07)< 0.0011.06 (0.007) (1.04, 1.07)< 0.001
Post estimation
BA (vs Asian)2.68 (1.10) (1.20, 5.99)  0.0172.83 (1.21) (1.22, 6.56)  0.015
BA (vs OB)2.87 (1.03) (1.42, 5.77)  0.0033.22 (1.21) (1.55, 6.71)  0.002
OB (vs asian)0.93 (0.32) (0.44, 1.74)0.840.87 (0.31) (0.45, 1.79)0.70
LSDD vs no disease
Asian (vs white)0.21 (0.09) (0.1, 0.48)< 0.0010.23 (0.1) (0.10, 0.53)  0.001
OB (vs white)0.24 (0.06) (0.14, 0.40)< 0.0010.25 (0.07) (0.14, 0.43)< 0.001
BA (vs white)0.51 (0.22) (0.22, 1.18)0.120.62 (0.27) (0.26, 1.46)0.27
Sex (F vs M)1.05 (0.15) (0.79, 1.39)0.75--
Age (yr) (proportional odds)1.06 (0.008) (1.05, 1.08)< 0.0011.06 (0.008) (1.05, 1.08)< 0.001
Post estimation
BA (vs asian)2.39 (1.39) (0.77, 7.49)0.132.71 (1.62) (0.83, 8.71)0.10
BA (vs OB)1.10 (0.53) (0.43, 2.85)0.842.48 (1.26) (0.91, 6.72)  0.075
OB (vs Asian)2.17 (1.07) (0.83, 5.70)0.111.09 (0.54) (0.41, 2.89)0.88
RSCDD vs no disease
Asian (vs white)1.24 (0.44) (0.61, 2.50))0.551.23 (0.45) (0.60, 2.54)0.57
OB (vs white)1.02 (0.28) (0.60, 1.75)0.941.07 (0.30) (0.62, 1.85)0.82
BA (vs white)3.54 (1.27) (1.75, 7.16)< 0.0013.51 (1.30) (1.70, 7.24)  0.001
Sex (F vs M)0.57 (0.11) (0.38, 0.84)  0.0040.60 (0.12) (0.40, 0.90)0.01
Age (yr) (proportional odds)1.04 (0.01) (1.02, 1.06)< 0.0011.04 (0.01) (1.02, 1.06)< 0.001
Post estimation
BA (vs asian)2.86 (1.36) (1.12, 7.28)  0.0282.85 (1.39) (1.10, 7.40)0.03
BA (vs OB)3.46 (1.45) (1.53, 7.86)  0.0033.30 (1.41) (1.42, 7.62)  0.005
OtB (vs asian)0.82 (0.34) (0.36, 1.87)0.640.87 (0.37) (0.36, 1.87)0.73
Table 3 Odds of having a higher density score in relation to disease subtype and demographic parameters
Diverticula density scoresPredictorsUnivariate analysis
Adjusted analysis - Final model
OR (SE) (95% CI)P valueOR (SE) (95% CI)P value
Higher vs lowerDisease type: RSCDD vs LSDD1.91 (0.41) (1.25, 2.91)0.0032.77 (0.67) (1.39, 3.32)0.001
Asian (vs white)0.59 (0.32) (0.21, 1.70)0.330.47(0.27) (0.16, 1.43)0.18
OB (vs white)0.57 (0.22) (0.27, 1.22)0.150.41(0.17) (0.18, 0.92)0.03
BA (vs white)0.43 (0.22) (0.16, 1.18)0.10.30(0.17) (0.10, 0.88)0.03
Sex (F vs M)0.98 (0.19) (0.67, 1.45)0.92--
Age (proportional odds)1.032 (0.01) (1.01, 1.05)0.0021.04 (0.01) (1.01, 1.06)< 0.001
Post-estimation
BA (vs Asian)0.72 (0.52) (0.17, 3.02)0.660.73(0.47) (0.21, 2.60)0.63
BA (vs OB)0.96 (0.62) (0.27, 3.40)0.950.64 (0.48) (0.15, 2.79)0.55
OB (vs Asian)0.75 (0.47) (0.22, 2.56)0.650.87(0.58) (0.24, 3.21)0.84