Original Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2011; 17(43): 4779-4786
Published online Nov 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i43.4779
Table 1 Comparison of baseline clinicopathological characteristics between cetuximab-containing chemotherapy group and non-cetuximab-containing group n (%)
Clinical factorsTotalCetuximab chemotherapyNon-cetuximab chemotherapyP value
Gender0.85
Male54 (63.5)29 (64.4)25 (62.5)
Female31 (36.5)16 (35.6)15 (37.5)
Age (yr), median (range)50 (12-79)0.56
Risk group (40-60)46 (54.1)23 (51.1)23 (57.5)
Non-riskgroup (< 40)39 (45.9)22 (48.9)17 (42.5)
Family history of tumor0.63
Yes12 (14.1)9 (20.0)3 (15.0)
No73 (85.9)36 (80.0)17 (85.0)
Tumor site0.89
Rectum24 (28.2)13 (28.9)11 (27.5)
Colon61 (71.8)32 (71.1)29 (72.5)
Primary clinical stage0.86
II12 (14.1)5 (11.1)7 (17.5)
III25 (29.4)15 (33.3)10 (25.0)
IV48 (56.5)25 (55.6)23 (57.5)
Histological grade0.93
Well differentiation6 (7.1)3 (6.7)3 (7.5)
Moderate differentiation57 (67.1)30 (66.6)26 (65.0)
Poor differentiation22 (25.9)12 (26.7)11 (27.5)
Table 2 Expression of Beclin-1 and LC3 in colorectal cancer and colorectal normal tissues n (%)
HscoresBeclin-1 expression
LC3 expression
CRCtissuesColorectal normal tissuesCRCtissuesColorectal normal tissues
05 (5.9)2 (7.1)4 (4.7)2 (7.1)
12 (2.4)0 (0.0)4 (4.7)1 (3.6)
28 (9.4)3 (10.7)9 (10.6)8 (28.6)
318 (21.2)7 (25.0)14 (16.5)5 (17.9)
44 (4.7)1 (3.6)5 (5.9)3 (10.7)
628 (32.9)13 (46.4)28 (32.9)8 (28.6)
920 (23.5)2 (7.1)21 (24.7)1 (3.6)
Z /P (K-M test)-0.94/0.35-2.63/0.00
Table 3 Correlation between Beclin-1 and LC3 expression with objective response rate and disease control rate in cetuximab-containing chemotherapy group and non-cetuximab-containing group in patients with advanced colorectal cancer n (%)
Beclin-1 expressionLC3 expression
LowHighLowHigh
Cetuximab-containing chemotherapy
CR0 (0)0 (0)00
PR4 (26.7)10 (33.3)9 (52.9)5 (17.9)
SD8 (53.3)7 (23.3)4 (23.5)11 (39.3)
PD3 (20.0)13 (43.3)4 (23.5)12 (42.8)
Non-cetuximab-containing chemotherapy
CR0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)    0 (0)
PR9 (42.9)7 (36.8)7 (43.7)9 (37.5)
SD9 (42.9)9 (47.4)6 (37.5)12 (50.0)
PD3 (14.2)3 (15.8)3 (18.8)3 (12.5)
Table 4 Objective response rate and disease control rate of patients with wild type KRAS and KRAS mutation in cetuximab-containing chemotherapy group n (%)
EffectWild type KRASMutant type KRASTotal
CR0 (0)0 (0)0
PR11 (42.3)1 (9.1)12 (32.4)
SD8 (30.8)3 (27.3)11 (29.7)
PD7 (26.9)7 (63.6)14 (37.8)
Total26 (70.3)11 (29.7)37 (100)
Table 5 Survival analysis of 45 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated by cetuximab-containing chemotherapy
Clinical factorsn (%)MOS (mo)P value
Gender0.93
Male29 (64.4)52.5
Female16 (35.6)33
Age (yr), median (range)
Risk group (40-60)23 (51.1)400.38
Non-riskgroup ( ≤ 40 or > 60)22 (48.9)35
Family history of tumor0.23
No36 (80.0)40
Yes9 (20.0)42
Tumor site0.88
Colon32 (71.1)42
Rectum13 (28.9)42
Primary clinical stage< 0.01
II5 (11.1)137
III15 (33.3)43
IV25 (55.6)22
Histological grade0.049
Well and moderate diff34 (75.6)43
Poor diff11 (24.4)23
Beclin-1 expression0.75
Low15 (33.3)42.5
High30 (66.7)35
LC3 expression0.27
Low17 (37.8)42.5
High28 (62.2)33
KRAS status0.73
Wild type28 (71.8)43
Mutation11 (28.2)22
Table 6 Multivariate analysis of 37 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated by cetuximab-containing chemotherapy
BSEWaldP valueOR95.0% CI for OR
LowerUpper
Primary clinical stage1.520.4312.630.004.551.9710.51
Histological grade-0.060.540.010.920.950.332.72
Beclin-1 expression-0.090.081.140.290.920.781.08
LC3 expression0.010.100.010.921.010.831.22
KRAS status0.520.461.270.261.680.684.15